I am confused about the number of cantrips the druid can prepare per day. Her Primal Spellcasting class feature says "At 1st level, you can prepare [...] five cantrips each morning", however table 3-11, "Druid Spells per Day", lists only 4 cantrips. The other prepared spellcasters, cleric and wizard, have the same language in their spellcasting class feature, but their tables list 5 cantrips. Is the druid table wrong?
Probably. Sounds like it leftover from the playtest 1.0.
"Before" being the playtest. Lots of other classes got shield proficiency in PF1.
Well, they've always had shield proficiency I guess. And they probably are limited to wooden shields, so they aren't as good as the other classes who get it, and between that and their armor limitations might have needed the boost.
I'd be shocked if Champions don't get Shield Block out the box since the dwarf champion was doing it at level 1 in Oblivion Oath. And they are at least as tied to shields as the fighter is.
The thing is, the wizard already gets more cantrips out the box than other casters. So they aren't exactly strapped for cantrips. Getting one less than other specialists doesn't really seem like the end of the world, and we will probably get other options to replace it with eventually. It is also prety great thematically for transmutaters to have, given its ties to guys like Karzough who liked to plaster their face on everything. (Also, there's a cleric in my game who has been preparing that on the regular and spamming it left and right just to mark her territory as they take over enemy dungeons.)
That said, moving prestidigitation to transmutation sounds reasonable.
And the new version of the Focus spell seems to be both quicker to cast and renewable, which addresses both complaints. It won't help much on a longer series of checks, but often enough physical skill checks are handled as one roll out of combat. As an example from Doomsday Dawn, giving an ally enough oomph to break down a door on their first try means getting the drop on the boss vs the boss laying an ambush for you.
Does that do gold to gold? So at level 2, 100 gold becomes 3 gold?
Personally, I've found magic items to be pretty easy to convert. Item levels really help a lot for finding the closest thing, and I've found it pretty easy to make PF2 versions of plot specific items.
I found one very good article (I think it was Ashiel's blog) about disregarding the "silver piece a day" economy, and actually using the Profession or Craft rules as basis of economy. That said, silvers as basis serve to reduce the ridiculous amount of coins that character usually had to carry. The bad thing about that is that it means it's even more unlikely that dragons are sleeping on piles of coins :D Frankly I would divest the gold from magic item economy and use coins as basis for kingdom building subsystems rather than personal power through items.
There might be something interesting you could do with some sort of raw magical material instead-- something that could be used not only as a currency for purchasing items but also the material used to craft them. But... I dunno how you'd explain that having no intersection with the gold economy. Like, eventually a wizard is going to need to buy a house or whatever, or an island, and I don't see why you couldn't spend gold to get the raw materials a some conversion rate or another.
The alternative is doing away with magical item shops entirely, I guess. But to maintain the level of "let players pick their items" that Pathfinder is based around, you'd basically make crafting mandatory.
Could we get some insight into how the Intimidate skill uses and feats differ from the playtest? I assume there's been some nerfing since it could be a pretty insane combat skill but I'm interested in how much.
I'm pretty sure the fleeing on a critical success thing is no longer,he default because I saw a skill feat that grants it.
The Gleeful Grognard wrote:
Sorry, that wasn't meant to be an attack. I just thought you might have been giving Voss a little more credit than he needs to say the sky is falling.
Matthew Downie wrote:
Well, we have a much more robust banking and electronic payment system than Golarion does. I suppose it isn't impossible that in certain cities you could deposit your gold with a bank and use the equivalent of checks or money transfers at least within that city, though. But I'd guess that for any campaign that has you hopping between unaligned settlements (Like, say, the upcoming Age of Ashes) you've got to be handing over copious amounts of cash at some point. Now some of that could be getting your coins turned into platinum bars, but you still have the weight of platinum at that point.
The Gleeful Grognard wrote:
Wait, you're assuming Voss has the actual final book? I wouldn't.
2 of my 5 players in one campaign started with a 16. One is a cleric/rogue, and considering her lack of offensive spells it makes sense to increase her dexterity or charisma for attacking or channels. The other is a two handed fighter who is still on even footing for accuracy with most of the party (and in fact will be ahead when we switch to PF2) and still does the most damage despite only having +3 from strength. It helps that the first expert weapon drop was a maul, so he's been on even footing with the archer fighter. I expect even if the archer pulls ahead for accuracy, the melee fighter will still be the leading damage dealer.
I'm beginning to suspect that Fife may be where they are sending all the books to be held for a while so they can be released as close to August 1st as possible. Which would be a bummer, but would probably be the most fair solution to those who are picking it up at GenCon and such.
People are posting pictures of their 2nd edition subscriptions arriving today. I thought it was all going to be released on August 1st at Gen Con...
It seems that with this many shipments, trying to tie all of them to arrive on the same date would be difficult. And they may have opted to get some of them arriving early rather than late.
Well, that depends where they ended up on somatic actions. By the end of the playtest you could use a somatic action with your hands full. IIRC material components were the only ones that actually needed a hand free, and even then sorcerers could ignore that.
Any creature that uses Arcane Magic will get you an Arcane Bloodline.
Let's take a look at the playtest bestiary and see what we have for arcane beasties.
Barghest (goblin exclusive?)
Definitely a few of those can be used as options, at least. (Also, I'm pretty sure there are a bunch of arcane tags in here that are either outdated and never corrected, or I don't fully understand how a creature can have both divine and arcane abilities.)
Being descended from the products of fleshwarping somehow seems like it has some promise for a pretty horrifying bloodline. And a bloodline that turns you into a giant or barghast could be cool. And I guess there's no reason we couldn't have an elven bloodline that devles further into elven magic than ancestry feats represent?
So I have been running this campaign in the second edition playtest rules, and plan to convert to second edition proper very soon. Book 2 was very fun, although a little easy as most of the enemies were very low level ghouls. We are currently just getting to Graul farmstead, but I'm looking ahead at Black Magga down the line. She's been hyped up already with some gather information checks, and I look forward to the "oh crap" moment when she shows up.
The problem is making sure she is survivable. In PF1, the enormous room for breaking the optimization curve meant many group not only survived her, but outright killed her. In PF2 the math is much tighter and level matters much more. Assuming they are level 9 when the fight goes down and she's level 15, even their martials buffed by Inspire Courage will need a 17-18 on the dice just to hit her on a first attack, an she's probably going to have a 50% chance to crit any of them on her first strike. That's before touching her damage resistance and myriad horrifying special abilities. She's gonna be auto-succeeding saving throws and critically succeeding many of them.
I can't see anyway the party can go toe to toe with her, so it basically seems to come down to whether they can distract her while keeping a distance. The Ranger can take pot shots from 200 feet away, the casters can fly to stay out of her reach... And they can hope for the best. I'm hoping I can instill the adequate sense of danger for them not to try anything more ambitious. The casters zooming 120 feet up firing magic missiles seems like it might buy 4 rounds.
I don't really want to diminish her by lowering her stats to where the melee folks can stand and bang with her, but I'd like to keep them contributing too. I've read some snippets about folks running her more like a natural disaster or something the party needs to drop buildings on. Anyone have recommendations for stuff like that? Ways the melee folks can be helping to evacuate folks while the ranged and fliers keep her distracted?
If you're using a 2-handed weapon that isn't a d12, that weapon almost certainly has a property on it that already makes you not want to use Power Attack. A flail user is trying to perform combat maneuvers, for example, and trying to fit in Power Attack will make it complicated to do that.
With MAP confirmed as applying to combat maneuvers which have critical failure conditions? I really wouldn't advise it, unless you have Assurance.
(Guess what one of my first house rules will be.)
In all the hubbub about fans getting their books, we haven't been talking about the stream much.
Fly now lasts 5 minutes instead of 1 and makes you fly at 20 feet or your land speed, whichever is faster.
Focus pools may be capped at 2 or 3 points? Not sure what the deal is there, but Logan made a comment that seemed to imply it. Also, we have confirmed sorcerers don't need to rest or do any special activity to Refocus, it just happens automatically. Clerics of healing deities can also Refocus from healing people.
Monster Identification is confirmed to have a table telling you what skills are tied to different kinds of monsters. One interesting thing is that Craft can be used to Recall Knowledge about constructs, as well generally evaluating the construction of objects. Sounds like this replaces Knowledge Engineering.
Skill DCs are going to have a "by level table" for stuff that should be rated by level, but the UTEML static DCs also got some elaboration. Sounds like they will be +/- 2/5/10 from their base levels to adjust for different difficulty levels.
Anti-Magic field was rare in the playtest, and I don't recall that being the case for any other spells. A glance at the spell list seems to confirm that. So it seems like a good guess for the CRB.
Mark Seifter wrote:
I suppose I should have specified what I meant by "permission from the GM." I count "changing the defaults" as part of that. If you ask your GM and they say it is fine, Bob is your uncle. Even if you don't have a feat giving you access or haven't found it in the story yet.
As an example, my player was very excited to bust out Raise Dead, not realizing it was uncommon, and I let it slide because the AP had a couple of scrolls of it as loot drops anyway.
People say it should be called Vital Strike because that's how it worked in PF1, but Vital Strike never really made much sense as a name. It isn't like your targeting the creature's vitals with extra precision damage. You were just making one big powerful swing. A powerful attack, if you will.
I'm curious about how they decided to handle traditionally 'story-breaking' spells like scrying, divination, teleportation, and raise dead.
Well, in the playtest, rarity was the answer. Those spells were marked as uncommon, so you generally needed to get the permission of your GM to have them. But they make for fun story awards too when the GM deems appropriate. For example, my players defeated a creature with the Nightmare template, and by conducting a ritual involving its corpse they were able to learn spells it knew, namely Shadow Walk and Nightmare.
Just to clarify, necromancer is almost certainly a school choice still, not a thesis. WBL looks almost exactly the same as the playtest (they just added a handy lump sum column for folks who liked that) and Imperial was in the playtest and acted as the equivalent of the PF1 arcane bloodline.
I do like that shield block is a feat or feature now. The playtest mechanics for gaining shield proficiency were hella complicated, It makes sense that any old person can hold it up for cover but you need training to actively soak a hit with it. In the playtest, IIRC, it was the other way around.
AnCap Dawg wrote:
Their real estate prices already seem to be through the roof, actually, given some comments from Oblivion Oath.
This really resonated with me. And it is worth remembering that a lot of limits have been really dialed up-- playtest fighters could leap 30 feet straight up and spike an enemy out of the sky like the volleyball by like level 8. The monk shenanigans with wall run are CRAZY. Rogues start walking through walls and Rangers can find their target across all of existence.
Which isn't to say you can't make a class with a panache pool, but our bar for "impossible things martials can do" has already been raised without a resource pool attached to it.
I'm not exactly sure where your problem is here, but yes, the best tank class in the game is going to beat the rogue or the sorcerer in a punch fest, largely thanks to his superior defenses, especially when he has 3 levels over his opponent. That paradigm isn't going to change in the final version. The rogue and sorcerer are significantly more versatile than the paladin and this don't bring as much to the punch table.
I haven't actually gotten into your numbers though to see if anything was wrong in it.
My players have just dealt with the cornfields of the Graul farmstead. The ranger opted to follow the cougar north instead of wait for whoever was singing to arrive, and then the party took cover in the trees and killed most of Rukus's dogs with the opening fireball, which set him to crying and running home to mama. The ranger heard him coming and wound up stepping out and talking to him with Glad Hand. While the rest of the party was climbing down out of the trees and following, he spent a few minutes working Rukus from hostile to friendly, including by using Battle Medic on the surviving pup. He got the whole story about the Black Arrows out of Rukus before sending him along home for some reason. It was a very interesting encounter, and those skills feats have really been putting in work.
I haven't been feeling inspired for converting the Graul family stat blocks though. I could just use ogres and then adjust levels and add the occasional class feat, I suppose. In general the humanoid NPC selection of the playtest bestiary was lacking past low levels though, and ogres are among the most boring stat blocks by default. I'm really eager to get my hands on the PF2 bestiary because even the "boring" critters like skeletons and zombies seem to have gotten new stuff in there.
Personally, I never loved the 75% rule, but that's because most of my players don't inherently enjoy shopping. Finding out that you went through the chore of digging through all the magic items to see if any interest you only to find out that item isn't there and you need to reevaluate your purchase plan feels frustrating.
But I've also seen players who build stock market mechanics inside campaigns. For some folks, having a realistic market is more immersive than avoiding excessive book keeping.
Rek Rollington wrote:
My body is ready.
Also, thanks to Rek and the mod team for trying to get this back on track.
Ah jeez, you're right. "End of your current turn." It was "until the start of your next turn" in the playtest. That's pretty much the only downgrade to this version of the feat I've seen. Well, that and it is sized capped, but the PT version was probably supposed to be as well and they just forgot the text. Improved Brutish Shove had some text indicating it was supposed to go up a size category, implying the original feat should have had the size capped in the first place. (I wonder if you can bump this up with Titan Wrestler? Maybe not by RAW...)
I'd say this feat still feels better than its PT version. Inflicting both flatfooted and the shove (plus allowing you to move with the shove) instead of *your opponents choice between the two* still feels better even if it doesn't make them flatfooted for your allies. I bet you can use the shove to push them into a flank anyway. And I'd imagine Improved Brutish shove not only lets you do it to large enemies but could extend the duration of the flatfooted.
Using Power Attack as your second strike seems counter-synergistic with Brutish Shove, which must be your second strike. I guess it's a choice between more damage and more control.
Well, he didn't choose Brutish Shove in the end, after all, so maybe it isn't meant to be the perfect pairing? After all, if he hadn't taken the wizard dedication there still would have been other fighter feats to pick from.
But the thing about Brutish Shove (and control options in general) is that they are situational. Making an enemy flat-footed is irrelevant if the enemy is already flat-footed (there are a lot of ways to make this happen) and Shoving them around the battle field is going to get varying results depending on the battle field. Brutish Shove is going to be very good indeed in certain situations, but when it isn't, having Strike > Power Attack as a fallback seems like a good way to maximize your damage.
If you're looking for a system that's tamer at high levels, 5e -might- be for you. Numbers in that game go up WAY slower and it results in a dynamic when even a high level party can be threatened by a significant number of low level enemies. You get stronger abilities and MUCH stronger spells as you level, which means some builds and classes definitely can dominate large numbers of weaker foes, at least to a point, but there are still ways to make more modest threats a threat still.
I'd like to point out that 5e isn't really better when it comes to magic making for gonzo plots. The bounded accuracy flattens the powercurve from a numerical standpoint, but outside of combat the spells are more plot breaking than the spells in the playtest. For example, casters get fly a level earlier in 5e, and both fly and invisibility last for 10 minutes out the box. Dimension door lets you carry another person, and teleport only takes 1 standard action to cast. The concentration mechanics mean your caster can't fly and be invisible at the same time in a fight, but combat isn't usually the big problem with plots breaking down.
If you want to avoid such shenanigans but still play with the mechanics of PF or D&D your best bet is capping your level.
IMO, I'm not sure this is a good fit for settlements that are spelled out like the ones in APs. Usually there is a specified list of vendors that include all relevant shops for adventurers. I'd generally assume they stock at least one of any given common item they can craft craft based on their level and assumed skill feats, plus uncommon items that your player has access to from feats. Then add uncommon items at your discretion. Now, if you don't have those shops spelled out for you, your system sounds pretty good. I imagine the gamemastery guide will have some settlement rules to help you refine them.
Oh, and getting items at discount is best simulated by the bargain Hunter skill feat in PF2. You could make that a default trained skill action (essentially giving everyone the feat for free) but that makes one of the best skills in the game even better and discourages anyone with charisma investment from using their lore skill to practice a trade and earn income.
If you're using one of the generic background in the CRB, then probably. But campaign specific backgrounds? I see those being hella useful. Giant lore for the Giant Slayer background in Rise of the Runelords, as an example.
Odds are the none-lore skill will almost always be one you would have wanted anyway. If you were a doctor, you are almost certainly going to want Medicine. So the biggest deal breaker will probably be the skill feat. So hopefully the skill feats are diverse enough to fit your concept and relevant enough to an adventurer to merit having.
Eh. All the social checks in the world won't give a town an item that they don't have in stock because no one in town can make it. And if they do have it in stock, they intend to sell it anyway, so why require a check?
The only exception would be contraband or the rare corner case. The alchemist might not openly broadcast that he sells poisons too and require a check to know you aren't a cop. And you could get the odd case for an item a shop keep has reserved for another buyer where you need to convince them otherwise. Say, a semi important noble. Or the odd item with sentimental value. But otherwise, they have the items to sell.
I'd hazard a guess that item level will be the big thing that determines availability. You can't craft items above your level. That is probably true of NPCs as well, even if their stats don't align with PCs otherwise.
So if the town's alchemist is 5th level, he will mostly stock 5th level or lower items, being unable to make anything above that level. And given making a profit is dependant on taking your time crafting the item (as opposed to doing a rush job to order) it is in that alchemists best interest to keep his inventory as well stocked as possible.
Now, the alchemist probably has a few items he purchased from adventurers or imported. But that's a limited selection, maybe 1d4 items per shop determined by your GM.
Also... even clerics wind up being better healers, that is their thing. It is like being bummed the alchemist can't be as good with a sword as a fighter. The alchemist has other things going for it. For example, mutagens can make for significantly stronger buffing to the party without burning top level spell slots.