|
Caeliat's page
Organized Play Member. 25 posts (29 including aliases). 1 review. No lists. No wishlists. 1 alias.
|


|
6 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Mark Moreland wrote: I find it truly perplexing that someone can claim that a character's sexuality is so overt as to be beating the reader over the head with it, while also claiming that they wouldn't have assumed the character was queer at all until they read the comments. Which is it? Representation: If explicit, it's "in your face" and "pandering" and "forced". If implicit, it's "too subtle, couldn't tell, I choose to erase queer folk."
If it's not catering to a cishet white majority, they will be damned sure to let you know how many things are wrong with it. How dare you create content that is not targeting straight white men. How dare you say that this heroic character is not heteronormative.
On the subject of Navasi's birth name, I not only see a firm point of not stating it for the sake of her new identity (and possibly protecting her own past), but hints of how people treat deadnames. It's not relevant, and if people knew it, they could use it to hurt her. It's safer forgotten.

|
12 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Thank you for this, Amanda. Navasi is amazing. And thank you to the devs who have chimed in on this thread.
To the straight people who complain that Navasi's sexuality is "too subtle", that they "didn't get it", that "stating sexuality isn't necessary" or that "pandering is insulting"... maybe consider that, for once, this character's backstory is not for you. Much like with Shardra. And that that is okay. Straight folks are plenty catered to. You can't even tell when you're being pandered to, because literally everything else in the media is a representation of what you look like and who you love. Yes, this is an effect of your privilege. If you couldn't tell that Navasi was in love with her partner, ask yourself why you are unaware of this. Ask yourself why coded language to address queer sexuality and identity has been a necessity in Europe and the US over the last few centuries. Stop assuming straight people are the default.
This goes for any time you think a minority is being "over-represented" (whatever the hell that means) or pandered to. There is no quota. Let minority people cheer for those whose identities they relate to. It's a big sandbox and you have plenty of toys.
If you need to erase her backstory or pick and choose through it to empathize with Navasi as a character... how do you manage to empathize with anything else in fantasy? Lizardfolk are fine, but you can't play a character if it turns out she canonically likes girls? When you say "let players choose" on issues like this, you are saying "let people pretend that real people, with them at the table, have identities that don't matter and can be replaced with something else". Several people who have replied to this thread aren't straight. Try to picture how reading your words feels like to us.
I have to wonder how many of the straight folks who so vehemently defend "let players choose the sexuality of an iconic" get mad when fanfiction writers come up with non-straight pairings.

|
6 people marked this as a favorite.
|
thejeff wrote: What I think would be interesting is why. Why, in a world where a complete transformation is possible (and fairly easy at high levels, I'd think), would she not choose it? If she didn't, was it a hard decision? Something she never really considered because she became comfortable with her body before it was really an option? First, we don't know whether or not she took it.
Second, this question has already been answered in this thread, in this very page. There is a multitude of reasons, and not all of them are related to finances, to the result of a surgical procedure, or the chance of something going wrong.
To use a poor analogy, imagine that you play an amateur sport. Why don't you want to go 'all the way' and become an Olympic athlete? There's a multitude of reasons for that, and whatever her body looks like, I'm pretty certain's Shardra's answer as to why it is like that is "because I am happy with it that way; another round of beer, please!"
Her present happiness and harmony with herself should be enough of an answer.

|
11 people marked this as a favorite.
|
thejeff wrote: Tirisfal wrote: thejeff wrote: Crystal Frasier wrote: thejeff wrote: True when it comes to real people. (Or in that case one fictional person to another.)
Somewhat less so when dealing with fictional characters. We often know many things about fictional characters that would be horribly rude to ask of real people. So we know details about any other iconic's personal bits? Kyra's cup size? Whether or not Valeros is circumcised? The color of Lini's squeedily spooch? No. Though from the art, cup size could probably be guessed. We do however know, or at least can assume barring accidents or other unrevealed trans characters, the basic nature of their bits. Color, size, circumcision and such things all are much smaller details.
More importantly, this is a character detail as well as a physical detail, which the other things you list generally aren't. Did she seek out a magical method to change her personal bits? Did she choose not to? Has she not made up her mind? Is she still looking for a way? And more importantly, for all of those, why?
There's character insight in all of that. If it's really that important for you to know (and it really isn't), why haven't you spoken up about Val's junk, or how Alain manscapes, or whether or not Imirjika's any different downstairs than a human woman? How is any of that unimportant to you when you so desperately need answers for this? Because those are all trivial details, almost completely unimportant to the character's background and motivation?
I don't desperately need answers. It's not that important.
I do think there's a significant difference between asking such questions about a fictional character and about a real person and between minor cosmetic details and major life choices. The thing that you should realize here is that, regardless of their fictional status, these characters are still written by real people and real people relate to them. If you don't think it's appropriate to ask a cis person about their body parts, you certainly don't ask it about a transperson, especially because many of them have body dysphoria. You're not offending Shardra, she's a character, but you're reinforcing the idea that it is okay to ask something like this about a person just because they are trans. Real or not, it's an implication that is very real for transpeople, and there are several of them in this thread alone; there's more to their identity than what's below their waist. If someone's body parts are trivial to you because they are cis, they should be trivial to you if they are trans. It's not your business and they don't come up on a roleplaying level unless you're drawing fanservice Paizo art (hi Liz!).
On a happier tone, I've been basking in how awesome Shardra is for the past two days, Crystal. Wonderfully done, and I am so proud of this thread.
EDIT: I just realized that her mace and Kolo's tail look alike. That is far too adorable.
Kassil wrote: The Silver Prince wrote: This is exclusive? *Darth Vader Voice* NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
The Red Bishop is a character I was hoping gets officially explored in a module or something. Ah well lol. The Red Bishop continues to torment Sutter, only now it's spread. Caeliat made him some special THE RED BISHOP KNOWS WHAT YOU DID and THE RED BISHOP WATCHES YOU SLEEP motivational images. I do so try to please!
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
I did not participate, but I dropped by for a few moments to cheer for one of the participants while waiting for my afternoon game--and the atmosphere in the room was great. This looked really fun, and is excellent proof that a good DM makes the event--the ads, in particular, were a touch of genius. I'll be certainly looking out for this next year!
|
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
And thus, Stompy is retired, off to a green, tasty pasture and lots of baby Stompies. Look for them on the Rock three seasons from now!
Something important: don't trust the information on Yelp to be accurate regarding delivery. According to phone calls earlier today, neither Olive Express nor Spice King actually deliver--so check the sheaf of delivery menus at the front desk and trust that instead of the interwebs.
I apparently missed this last night. Hi!
My initial concept is a human inquisitor of Sarenrae, mostly melee-based. I can work on alternative ideas if that wouldn't fit in.
The Skylight and her crew return to defend the title (and the dinner menu)!
I was so happy when I saw an open spot. My lottery draw was pretty lackluster, but the open signups are looking up so far.
The "Why do I always roll 1 on Leap" Menu:
- Glyptodon in blankets
- Tossed salad à la Shambling Mode
- Blue Dragon filet mignon (the chef regretfully informed me they were out of Mammoth brisket)
- Skewers of Bear Polar flambé
Remember, do not declaw your Bulettes.
I was playing Sorrow at the time, so I didn't get a chance to drop by. But the Bloody Jack slot on Saturday added a lot to my latest scarf, and I did have my Dalek fingerless gloves with me, so I was there in spirit.
Those RoW mittens are awesome!
Free Captain Larisa of the Skylight, ready to spill blood, Master Daigle!
Kajehase wrote: alerts Kassil Minions.
Viking minions at that.
I could easily get used to this.
Freehold DM wrote: Mmm...Vodka or bourbon? I like a woman that can drink!
uh...you are a woman, right?
Yes. However, I fear there is no future between me and someone who hates The Princess Bride. There is no such thing as overexposure.
Kajehase: Pfft, judges. Who cares what they think. (I kid, I kid.) And Chronicles getting Silver! It was a magnificent sweep.
"Gold ENnie for Product of the Year goes to Pathfinder: Advanced Player’s Guide, Paizo Publishing"
The eighth, and final, as Dresden Files took the silver in that category.
Freehold DM: Wine, not so much, but vodka or bourbon sound like a plan.
EIGHT ENnies for Paizo. WOOOOOOOOOO.
ETA, yet again: I forgot about Fan Favorite Publisher, which Paizo just took the gold of. :D
Mairkurion {tm} wrote: Caeliat wrote: "Gold ENnie for Best Monster/Adversary goes to Pathfinder: Bestiary 2, Paizo Publishing"
Is that happening now? Where are you getting the news? You just got it on the chat, but for the sake of others who are not there:
@ENnies
ETA: "Gold ENnie for Best Adventure goes to Pathfinder Adventure Path #43: The Haunting of Harrowstone, Paizo Publishing"
And there goes the sixth.
ETA2: "Gold ENnie for Best Supplement goes to Pathfinder: Advanced Player’s Guide"
And the seventh.
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
"Gold ENnie for Best Monster/Adversary goes to Pathfinder: Bestiary 2, Paizo Publishing"
Between that and pmg and sm on a motherf*cking plane, WOOO!
ETA, again: "Gold ENnie for Best Setting goes to Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Inner Sea World Guide"
That's the fifth gold. ^_^
Lissa Guillet wrote: Caeliat wrote: That sucks so much. :/
Hey, at least there are good news: "Gold ENnie for Best Cartography goes to Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Inner Sea Poster Map Folio, Paizo, Cartography Rob Lazzaretti" and "Gold ENnie for Best Interior Art goes to Pathfinder: The Inner Sea World Guide, Paizo Publishing, Art Direction by Sarah E. Robinson".
Go Paizo!
ETA: "Gold ENnie for Best Production Values goes to Pathfinder: Bestiary 2"
:D You might be able to drive there if you are close enough, way before you'd get there in a plane. You realize I'm on the other side of the ocean, right? Driving isn't much of an option.
Unless I'm driving a submarine.
That sucks so much. :/
Hey, at least there are good news: "Gold ENnie for Best Cartography goes to Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Inner Sea Poster Map Folio, Paizo, Cartography Rob Lazzaretti" and "Gold ENnie for Best Interior Art goes to Pathfinder: The Inner Sea World Guide, Paizo Publishing, Art Direction by Sarah E. Robinson".
Go Paizo!
ETA: "Gold ENnie for Best Production Values goes to Pathfinder: Bestiary 2"
:D
Demonskunk wrote: 0gre wrote: Demonskunk wrote: the answer you keep giving me is "because they're weaker" which feels dismissive to me. Why are dogs in the Bestiary less powerful than lions?
Why are trolls more powerful than humans?
Your question is of the same nature. Not every creature is the same. Kobolds are designed to be fairly easy low level challenges for PCs so they are weaker than the typical PC. Yes. their monster stats are low for that reason, but their PC/NPC stats should be equal to other NPC/PC race stats, so that when making a PC/NPC of that particular race you don't have to compensate to get them up to a certain level. Why? No one is forcing you to play a kobold. If you choose to play one of them, you should accept their limitations. It's what makes them kobolds and not one of the standard, balanced PC races.
Quote: Please Reply Urgent
Bill & Exchange Manager.
Mr.IBRAHIM DANJUMA.
Dear friend,
I am Mr.IBRAHIM DANJUMA am the manager of auditing and accounting department Bank of African(B.O.A) in Burkina faso. I would like you to indicate your interest to receive the transfer of$10.5 Million. I will like you to stand as the next of kin to my late client whose account is presently dormant, for claims.
(1) Full names:
(2) Private phone number:
(3) Current residential address:
(4) Occupation:
(5) Age and Sex:
Yours faithful,
Bill & Exchange Manager.
FROM Mr.IBRAHIM DANJUMA
All your identity are belong to us.
|