How is the barbed arrow supposed to work when the bow doesn't have reach? Spoiler: Ranged Tactics Toolbox wrote: Barbed Arrow: *snip* When a barbed arrow is attached to a length of silk rope and fired from a bow, the arrow’s range increment is reduced to 30 feet, but it gains the grapple special weapon quality *snip* Ultimate Equipment wrote: Grapple: On a successful critical hit with a weapon of this type, you can attempt a combat maneuver check to grapple your opponent as a free action. *snip* While you grapple the creature using a grappling weapon, you can only move or damage the creature on your turn. You are still considered grappled, though you do not have to be adjacent to the creature to continue the grapple. If you move far enough away that the creature you’re grappling is no longer within the weapon’s reach, you end the grapple with that action.
Purple Dragon Knight wrote: Based on careful reading of abundant ammunition spell, it appears that any non-magical ammo is replaced (the word including usually implies "but not limited to" in the English language), and that would include alchemical ammo (i.e. anything that does not radiate magic is non-magical) i don't see anything in the spell description that limits it to non-magical ammo. for the spell to function (since it can still be casting on the container w/o meeting #1), it only requires...
say you have a quiver with a 1 darkwood arrow, 1 +1 arrow, and 1 loaf of bread. it meets requirement #1, since it contains non-magical ammo. when you draw the normal arrow, it meets requirement #2, since the drawn item is an arrow and it replaces a new one in the quiver. if you draw a +1 arrow, it meets requirement #2, since that is also ammo and is replaced in the quiver by a new one. if you draw the loaf of bread, it does not meet requirement #2, since it is not ammo to any known weapon.
what i really want out of my thread, is to find out whether or not there has been an official ruling, and that has been satisfied
Claxon wrote:
we'll just have to agree to disagree and wait for a FAQ
What would happen if you drop a bow when you have a quiver? Do they cease to count as ammo as long as the spell is in effect?
'Projectile weapons use ammunition' also, in Ranged Tactics pg5, says 'thrown weapons are their own ammunition' this seems pretty conclusive that alchemical weapons are ammo.
I've seen a million AA threads. But never saw an official running while browsing through. Has there been an official ruling/errata/FAQ on how Abundant Ammunition works in relation any/all of the following... 1- container w both magical and no magical ammo.
this thread need only be about the rulings, not people's opinions on which is RAW and which is RAI.
Kobold Cleaver wrote:
has this been discussed, here or elsewhere? |