Boles.r's page

2 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Whenever these types of post show up theres 2 extreme sides to them that I find hilarious.

One group strongly cast down any resemblance to 4e. More times than not in a confrontational kind of way. I get it though, 4e is the reason why PF exists in the first place. Would it be betrayal if PF took from 4e?

The second group is excited by the fact that PF2e shares similarities with 4e. After all this group probably loved 4e and was sad that it was no longer supported. 5e certainly didnt resemble 4e. This group probably finally feels like they have a game they can get behind and supports their style of play.

I dunno its interesting to see the two sides. You see comments defending that PF2e plays anything like 4e while the other timidly suggests the more they play the more they see 4e.


Has anyone play tested this class? It does look over powered at first glance. Colour me interested.