Hello everybody,
I will soon partecipate in a Pathfinder Campaign as a 10 level human paladin. He is an ex D&D character with very high rolled stats
(the group is a sort of "Justice League", the best of the best...)
STR 18
DEX 15
CON 17
INT 13
WIS 16
CHA 17
For flavour and background reasons, he has a few mandatory characteristics:
-skilled and dedicated swordsman (Weapon focus: longsword)
-elite cavalry (Spirited Charge feat tree)
-bonded mount (heavy warhorse)
-sword and board build (swift lay on hands allowed, even with shield)
-1 flaw (as per "Player Options: Flaws" by Paizo)
Should I walk the TWF path? With a 2-levels fighter dip, I think I could play a well-rounded character:
Pal1 Weapon Focus (racial) - Mounted Combat (regular) - Ride-by attack (flaw)
Ftr1 Power Attack (class)
Ftr2 Spirited Charge (regular) - Improved Shield Bash (class)
Pal2
Pal3 Two weapon fighting
Pal4
Pal5 Shield Slam
Pal6
Pal7 Double Slice (or Step Up)
Pal8
Of course, I would take Shield Master at 11
Will I regret, in the long term, the loss of the capstone feature? Would it be a more "conventional" buld better?
Something like this:
Pal1 Weapon Focus (racial) - Mounted Combat (regular) - Ride-by attack (flaw)
Pal2
Pal3 Spirited Charge
Pal4
Pal5 Power Attack
Pal6
Pal7 Cleave
Pal8
Pal9 ??
Pal10
I look forward for Your advices and thank You all in advance.