| Anniyden |
I think there is some confusion here about r-selected and k-selected. These are relative terms, not absolute classificatory terms. Rats are k-selected compared to bees, but r-selected compared to elephants. Bees are k-selected compared to bacteria, but r-selected compared to dogs.
Yep, some of it is relative and there is gray area (heck some call it a continuum). In my experience, r and K is often used when describing community successional patterns - usually communities of relatively closely related taxa (eg fish community in a stream, trees in a forest, etc.). Originally, I believe r/k came from MacArthur and Wilson and their Theory of Island Biogeography. I recently read the paper where Simberloff and Wilson defaunated a series of mangrove islands (that's right kids - they nuked all life). The investigators then followed the trail of immigration and recolonization. I'd wager this is where Wilson came up with some of the r/K theory - from watching ants colonize mangrove islands.
In aquatics, I can definitely see some well defined r-strategists. Species that are extremely fecund, achieve sexual maturity quickly, possess a short life span, and are great dispersers. There are a lot of curveballs in the aquatic environment though that don't fit so neatly.