Wolf

Airdawg's page

3 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.


RSS


The material could be viewed only by the players in the game (usually limited to 6 to 10), or those who are lurking in the game, and this can be controlled by the gamemaster as to what they can view. By "Graphics" I would refer to maps and pictures of the "Monsters and NPCs" necessary to run the game. I run games on rondaksportal.com and I have a Greyhawk game that has been running there for over two years. I am using material from "Dungeon" magazine to run it.


I run games on a website named Rondak's Portal. I would like to run a "Pathfinder" game there. I have read and reread the OGL but can't find an answer to this question: Can I reproduce and use maps and graphics from the material if I give credit for them to Pazio?


bigby99 wrote:
I have been playing D&D for several years, and my children are learning the rules now (and dragging my wife into the mess too). I want to know what other longtime gamers think of 3.5 edition, and if a revision was really needed.

I have been playing D&D since 1983, which makes me old enough to realize that for any business to be a success they must have something new, all the time, in order to maintain sales. I got into D&D when it was AD&D, but the first thing we bought was the original small white boxed set. I have been faithful through all the products and all the changes because I LIKE the game. Ther have been changes, to include Wizards and Hasboro, But, here we are 22 years later and still gaming. Other companies have folded who seemed to have good products and gaming lines, But Dungeon and Dragons is still around and as far as I can tell going strong. Viva Le Differance!!