4-RD's page

Organized Play Member. 4 posts (5 including aliases). No reviews. 1 list. 1 wishlist. 2 Organized Play characters. 1 alias.


RSS

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Awesome!

Thanks for the advice everyone, just got back from this fortnights session and everything went well.

After talking about it with the GM, the crux of the issue was that whilst my OOC talk was not being used by my character, the felt that it created to much potential for the other player to metagame, which in turn meant the GM had to change things up to prevent them from doing so.

When I brought up my concerns regarding their statement that my talking about various creatures was forcing them to add encounters, they conceded that this was not the case but none the less they did find it caused issues with encounters they were planning because players were now aware such creatures exist, and could not be completely be counted on the not inadvertently metagame.

This also brought to light that the GM is Mis-Recalling events, such as apparently I mentioned Lava children, a creature they were really looking to use, but this was found to be not the case since I genuinely did not know what they were up until a little while ago and found that they were Third Party Content, which is something I make a point of staying away from and can safety say I have never read. There was also a example of me apparently mentioning that there were werewolves in the nearby forest, but when I went through my notes regarding that session I found that an NPC had actually told us about them.
But I have decided for the sake of keeping the peace to not mention these findings, despite finding it a little irksome.

As a result of the chat with the GM, I am making an effort not to speak about the game OOC, which is a bit amusing since I am finding myself a bit more aware of when players are looking to me for details regarding what is happening and what options are available, and some awkward moments.

For example, when one of the players asked me about the effects of lycanthropy, because we we fighting werewolves at the time, which I had successfully identified, I was about to but stopped and stated I had not done the right dice roll to know about the actual effects of lycanthropy yet and thus couldn't, which straight away felt a little passive aggressive, particularly since the GM sits right next to me and likely heard this.

The players instant reaction was "Well fine then, I will look it up myself" which had me thinking "Doesn't that kind of negate my not talking OOC regarding the game?", which is something I will bring up with the GM tomorrow via text since it's rather late at night atm, and the GM has work early tomorrow.

All in all, Thanks everyone for helping me safety resolve the situation :)

***EDITED TO CLARIFY/EXPAND ON THE LYCANTHROPY QUERY***

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Hi everyone,

I'm looking for a bit of advice regarding something that is occurring in a game that I play in on a fortnightly basis.

I happen to be one of the more knowledgeable players at the table and often find myself making off hand remarks OOC about cool things in the area (Locations, monsters, etc) to the GM.

But recently they have advised me that this is 'Metagaming', and that I am talking about things my character should not know, and also by mentioning interesting creatures in the area I am forcing them to add encounters that they were not originally intending to have, thus bogging down the story/game.

I genuinely feel quite guilty because it never crossed my mind that saying things like "oh this country has some awesome J R Random creatures around, like blah and blah" was forcing the GM to add extra encounters and sacrifice story development.
But I also find myself thinking "it's up to the GM if they want to add a monster or not, just because I mention it shouldn't force their hand in anyway, should it?"

I also find myself EXTREMELY concerned about what I say OOC being considered Metagaming, particularly since I generally take a rather strong stance against it due to having played with some friends who metagamed rather heavily and ruined what was up to that point quite an enjoyable game.

I have always run under the impression that Metagaming is when your character acts with knowledge that they should not have, and I have racked my brains and gone through my journal to try and find an instance when I have done anything that could be considered that, but found nothing.

All monsters my character has known things about have been due to successful knowledge rolls, and any location we know about is because a NPC told us about it.
But despite this I cannot help but feel concerned, because just because I don't recall it doesn't mean it hasn't happened.

I am posting this in an effort to get a bit of advise as how to handle this, seeing as tomorrow we have another session, which will be preceded with a "Review", where we basically say what we think about things and what needs to be improved/changed, and this will be the first session since the GM notified me in a quick text on their way to work of my metagaming, with no example of what exactly what had been an act of metagaming.

The primary concern is that the GM is likely considering what I say out of character as metagaming since my character would not have that knowledge and that they feel my 'fanboying' interesting things in the region is forcing their hand regarding encounters.
Is this actually a screw-up on my side? Am I actually doing something wrong here?

Thanks in advance for any advice as to how to resolve this situation without hurting the GM's feelings or taking a whipping for something that wasn't my fault.

Grand Lodge

Ah well, thanks!

Grand Lodge

I am currently looking into ways to supplement the weak combat skills of my Oracle and am wondering what the usual ruling is with using Mage Hand to throw dirt or broken glass into and opponents eyes?

Near as I can figure, it should be possible, being under 5lbs and an unattended object.