| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Up to the DM, but I'd say absolutely. But the DM should read it carefully and decide which passages would get nixed from a Wikipedia article. For example:
Spoiler:
Partitioning the station’s different neighborhoods
into dozens of electoral districts over the years—many times
in ways that favor one faction over others—means that, while
most syndics are democratically elected, some corporate or
criminal enclaves are dynasties in all but name.
into dozens of electoral districts over the years—many times
in ways that favor one faction over others—means that, while
most syndics are democratically elected, some corporate or
criminal enclaves are dynasties in all but name.
That would get tagged right away as "citation needed". We know it's true because the author who wrote it is essentially the God that created the world. But on the "info sphere" that would definitely be an editorial opinion or a rumor or a conspiracy theory, not a solid journalistic or historical fact.
In that spirit, I'd advise a DM to flag every such section and create 3 or 4 "fake news" alternates for each opinion or rumor or theory.