
Scythia |
7 people marked this as a favorite. |

Given that this thread reiterated that the official answer will never be revealed, let's come up with a list of (tongue in cheek) ways Aroden died.
1. Lost initiative to a dual wield Gunslinger.
2. Tried to stop a crit from Asmodeus only to find out his Jingasa was used up.
3. Had extracted oaths from all creatures not to harm him except songbirds... I mean how could they be dangerous?

Scythia |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |

11. In a bid to impress Shelyn, Aroden tried to wrestle Rovagug, after asking Cayden to hold his ale stein.
12. In a sparring match, Gorum got too enthusiastic, and Aroden couldn't remember how Crane Wing was supposed to work now in time to block the attack.
13. Turns out the Starstone only gives loaner powers, and Aroden's borrowing time was up.

Kobold Catgirl |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Norgorber being Aroden incognito is my new headcanon.
By the way, a brief correction to the OP: There is no official explanation for what killed Aroden. Like what caused the Day of Mourning, it's intended to be a mystery to all. Paizo isn't just sitting on the secret vault containing the cause of death. The secret is open for all GMs to invent and pick at.

Snakers |
Not true, Cleaver. Jacobs said that they do actually know why Aroden died and they keep it so that everything they publish about it will make sense if it somehow ever gets leaked/revealed, but that he believes there arent nearly enough clues to actually make any reasonable guess as to why in anything presently published.
30. Asmodeus offered him a vacation in return for getting to run his country.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Not true, Cleaver. Jacobs said that they do actually know why Aroden died and they keep it so that everything they publish about it will make sense if it somehow ever gets leaked/revealed, but that he believes there arent nearly enough clues to actually make any reasonable guess as to why in anything presently published.
So they claim. Conveniently there's no way to prove it either way so long as they refuse to give details.

Kobold Catgirl |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Not true, Cleaver. Jacobs said that they do actually know why Aroden died and they keep it so that everything they publish about it will make sense if it somehow ever gets leaked/revealed, but that he believes there arent nearly enough clues to actually make any reasonable guess as to why in anything presently published.
*pretentious literary critic mode*
That's an absurd authorial indulgence. Paizo doesn't get to have its own private "one true canon"—such a claim betrays the most fundamental premise of the Death of the Author. Simply put, if you don't actually officiate an idea, it's not official. It's just a very well-constructed theory, and quite entirely on par with everyone else's. Like Tolkien's belief that Frodo would have eventually shaken free of the Ring and thrown it into the fire without Gollum's intervention, James Jacobs's idea about the "truth" is an author's headcanon. Nothing more.
Paizo should have the conviction in their work to allow a mystery to be a mystery. They shouldn't need to be "right" about their own personal answer.
*/pretentious literary critic mode*
:)

Scythia |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |

I never thought I'd hear a call for death of the author about James Jacobs, he seems like an affable guy. :P
37. Aroden encountered some protean babies, and made the wrong decision about what to do with them, falling from divinity as a result.
38. Aroden had used spell-like abilities to early enter a Prestige Class, and was thus unraveled when the universe shifted to eliminate that possibility.
39. At one of Cayden's parties, Aroden ended up being chosen for "seven minutes in heaven". The other individual chosen? Zon-kuthon. Mistakes were made.

SilvercatMoonpaw |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |
40) Pharasma went on vacation and blackmailed him in to sitting for her.
41) I'm not saying it was god aliens.........but it's god aliens.
42) As the God of Prophecy he looked into the future of Earth and saw that the Pathfinder campaign setting wasn't going to be nearly as interesting with him alive. Thus he committed suicide to ensure that Golarion had a Big Damn Thing That Overshadows Everything.

![]() |

That's an absurd authorial indulgence. Paizo doesn't get to have its own private "one true canon"—such a claim betrays the most fundamental premise of the Death of the Author. Simply put, if you don't actually officiate an idea, it's not official. It's just a very well-constructed theory, and quite entirely on par with everyone else's. Like Tolkien's belief that Frodo would have eventually shaken free of the Ring and thrown it into the fire without Gollum's intervention, James Jacobs's idea about the "truth" is an author's headcanon. Nothing more.
I think that's ridiculous. The creator's The Creator - what they have in mind is of course the ultimately true answer.
I'm glad to hear that about Frodo, too!

Combat Monster |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |

I think that's ridiculous. The creator's The Creator - what they have in mind is of course the ultimately true answer.
I'm glad to hear that about Frodo, too!
Only if they actually bother to create it and insert it into the canon at some point.
As of right now, Mr. Jacob's unexplained theory holds no more weight on the canon then any other theory and until it's made official, that is going to continue to be the case.
I think it's more ridiculous to have a secret the powers that be never plan on sharing. Sure one can argue "but it takes away the mystique to know!"
Knowing the secret will never be revealed only makes me not care about it.
I think a better option would be to slowly reveal things all the while making new mysteries, lest the world building become stagnant.

Scythia |

But of course, Kobold. What else would one expect from the Chained Heart and Goddess of Slavery?
53. Aroden learned too late the difference between invulnerable immortality and merely ageless immortality when the Starstone rolled ontop of him pinning him with it's semi-cosmic weight.
54. Aroden was suffocated beneath a massive tsunami of cards upon which warriors had written complaints about being outclassed by magic users.
55. Aroden "retired in order to spend more time with his family".

PossibleCabbage |
2 people marked this as a favorite. |

Paizo doesn't get to have its own private "one true canon"—such a claim betrays the most fundamental premise of the Death of the Author. Simply put, if you don't actually officiate an idea, it's not official. It's just a very well-constructed theory, and quite entirely on par with everyone else's. Like Tolkien's belief that Frodo would have eventually shaken free of the Ring and thrown it into the fire without Gollum's intervention, James Jacobs's idea about the "truth" is an author's headcanon. Nothing more.
Additionally, if Paizo has no intention of ever revealing what happened to Aroden, but internally has a private notion of what did happen and are trying to keep things consistent with that in case they change their minds on "never revealing it", it's not that they cannot just as easily change their minds on "what actually happened". I mean, James Jacobs could come up with an idea for "what happened to Aroden" that he likes more, and is also consistent with the hints they've dropped. So the "thing they 'know' but won't tell us" can't even be considered the "true" answer in any meaningful sense.
People writing serials often have an intended ending from some early point, but that ending can change dramatically before we actually get there because writers are entitled to change their minds, and narrative developments are arrived at "what is interesting" or "what seems right" rather than "exhaustion of all of the possibilities".

Kobold Catgirl |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Kobold Cleaver wrote:That's an absurd authorial indulgence. Paizo doesn't get to have its own private "one true canon"—such a claim betrays the most fundamental premise of the Death of the Author. Simply put, if you don't actually officiate an idea, it's not official. It's just a very well-constructed theory, and quite entirely on par with everyone else's. Like Tolkien's belief that Frodo would have eventually shaken free of the Ring and thrown it into the fire without Gollum's intervention, James Jacobs's idea about the "truth" is an author's headcanon. Nothing more.
I think that's ridiculous. The creator's The Creator - what they have in mind is of course the ultimately true answer.
I'm glad to hear that about Frodo, too!
The Author's just a very enthusiastic reader. The Work is something they made, but it's not theirs.
As of right now, Mr. Jacob's unexplained theory holds no more weight on the canon then any other theory and until it's made official, that is going to continue to be the case.
Bingo! It's Schrodinger's Secret: It both is and is not canon until the author makes a definitive decision to include it or not include it.
56. He's fine! He's fine. He just went off to a, uh, butterfly farm upstate. You know, the same place Uncle Ray went. He's really happy there. Lots of room to run around. We'll take you there to see him one day.

Chemlak |
4 people marked this as a favorite. |

54. Not dead. He got bored, took human form, and got an entry level position at Paizo because it amused him. One night after too many Jell-O shots he let slip something about his true form. The next morning one of the writers wrote that he lost his powers and now he's stuck with them.
Oh my... Aroden is COSMO!

Drahliana Moonrunner |

Kobold Cleaver wrote:That's an absurd authorial indulgence. Paizo doesn't get to have its own private "one true canon"—such a claim betrays the most fundamental premise of the Death of the Author. Simply put, if you don't actually officiate an idea, it's not official. It's just a very well-constructed theory, and quite entirely on par with everyone else's. Like Tolkien's belief that Frodo would have eventually shaken free of the Ring and thrown it into the fire without Gollum's intervention, James Jacobs's idea about the "truth" is an author's headcanon. Nothing more.
I think that's ridiculous. The creator's The Creator - what they have in mind is of course the ultimately true answer.
I'm glad to hear that about Frodo, too!
I'm of two minds about it. It sounds much like Rowlings coming out later saying that Hermione should have shacked up with Harry Potter instead of the boy she married. It's a case of Tolkien contradicting himself, because if Frodo would have been able to throw off the One Ring by himself, there would have been no need for Gandalf's far-sighted statements concerning Gollum. Statements that kept several people from offing him when they had clean opportunity to do so, thus having him there to do the one absolutely right thing THAT NEEDED TO BE DONE... even if for the wrong reason.