Fayries |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I'm sure I saw the correction to Merisiel's Shadow role card somewhere already, but it doesn't appear to be in the FAQ. Shouldn't it?
Vic Wertz Chief Technical Officer |
Vic Wertz Chief Technical Officer |
When the Lycanthropes appear in the errata deck, they will have an additional change: the words "Blessing of the Gods" will be replaced with "a Basic blessing." This has no effect within Skull & Shackles, but it would make a difference if you were doing a homebrew project that used these cards in a box that (like Wrath of the Righteous) has Blessings of Ascension instead of Blessings of the Gods.
Since there's no mechanical effect in normal play, I didn't create a FAQ entry for this change... but since all of these cards were already changed by a previous FAQ resolution, I *did* add it as a parenthetical to that entry.
Vic Wertz Chief Technical Officer |
Yep. You will note that the FAQ applies to the Lycanthropes from RotR too. However, because they have already appeared in the errata deck without this change, and it's not a functional change in standard play, you won't see that wording on printed RotR cards. But if we were to drop any of the RotR Lycanthropes into future sets, they will say "a Basic blessing", as they will in the Obsidan version of RotR.
(You probably won't see the words "Blessing of the Gods" on many cards other than Blessing of the Gods from now on.)
Vic Wertz Chief Technical Officer |
Vic Wertz wrote:I have updated this one, adding another sentence to the resolution.Vic Wertz wrote:Another.(I may have posted that last one a bit too early. I'm not taking it down, but it may change slightly.)
This entry has been updated again; everything after the semicolon is new.
Vic Wertz Chief Technical Officer |
The entry for Adamantine Trident +3 has been updated (the last part of the question is new, and the resolution has been updated).
mlvanbie |
Added Gloves of Dueling.
The replacement text doesn't match the question answer -- 'any number of cards' would include 0. Maybe this is the original text?