Jenner2057
|
Had kind of an interesting experience this weekend. I was doing some holiday cleaning and picked up my old copy of WE3. I decided to reread it and was absolutely blown away.
Now to explain, I remember reading the original series about 7 years ago and thinking it was ok, but this time I was utterly floored by what a complex story was told in such a relatively simple manner. Some how on the first reading I must have quickly just skimmed through it and tossed it aside for the next book.
I was just kind of curious if anyone else had a similar experience. Where an older graphic novel just completely hit you a different way on the second (or subsequent) reading. Or maybe you missed a crucial element to the story on the first read because you were skimming through it so fast.
Laters!
-J
Jenner2057
|
WE3? Care to expand those initials for the rest of the class?
Sorry, "WE3" is actually the name of the graphic novel by Grant Morrison. Not initials despite the looks. :) I guess I should have used the quotes to clear that up. My bad!
In-story though it stands for Weapon 3. Story is about animals that are turned into cyborgs and they refer to themselves as "WE3", thus the name of the comic.
| Doodlebug Anklebiter |
I've been mostly nonplussed by Grant Morrison over the years, but I did love We 3 or WE3 or whatever.
I don't have a similar story, really, but I did recently re-read Nextwave: Agents of H.A.T.E. by Warren Ellis and I forget who. It was pretty hilarious!
I guess this story would kind of fit: so, I had 3/4ths of Frank Miller's Ronin for years without knowing how it ended. Finally picked up the trade (this would be like 2 or 3 years ago) and was terribly disappointed by the ending! Not that it wasn't good, but it wasn't what I wanted.
Jenner2057
|
Actually "Ronin" is a good example for me too. I first read that when I was in middle school, got to the end and my only reaction was "Huh? I don't get it."
Reread it years later (college I think) and it made a lot more sense. I think the first time I completely missed the connection between the psychic parapelegic kid and the computer. Shrug.
I'll have to check out "Nextwave" though. Thanks for the tip!
| Doodlebug Anklebiter |
I liked it a lot.
It's terribly inconsequential, just them making a silly superhero comic for, I don't know, crazy left-wing D&D dorks. There's one issue where there's just two pages of dialogue--the first and last--and the rest is just these hilarious two-page battle scenes.
It's all third-tier Marvel characters, some of whom I didn't even recognize.
I liked Ronin a lot. I don't know if that came through in my last post, but I wanted to make it clear.
I was going to re-read From Hell. I had planned on using as a tome in my Carrion Crown game, but the players never took the bait. I've been planning a comics binge, and I think I'll start there.
What else are you reading?
Jenner2057
|
I liked Ronin a lot. I don't know if that came through in my last post, but I wanted to make it clear.
Yup! Came through loud and clear. And I agree, even on the first reading when I didn't understand the ending (at all) it was still a very enjoyable read.
I've heard lots of good things about "From Hell" as well. It's been on my list to check out for a while but haven't gotten around to it.
Keeping with my current theme of revisiting old graphic novels, I've been meaning to go back and read "Arkham Asylum" again. I remember HATING that one back in highschool. Very impressed by the stunning artwork, sure, but I think I missed the story in that one as well. It's another Morrison work too, so I'm sensing a theme where I missed his point on some of his older stuff.
DISCLAIMER: I too have never been a huge Grant Morrison fan. (Actually I HATED his run on X-Men.) Just seems like I've been willing to go back and give some of his older stuff another shot. We'll see.