
Id Vicious |

I'm saying something controversial. Later, someone with an opposing viewpoint will call me a douchebag. I will then call him a douchebag, and we will have a troll party. The trolls will all have party hats.
A week later, when everyone's family has been insulted, a moderator will kill the trolls with fire.

The Status Crow |

I'm saying something controversial. Later, someone with an opposing viewpoint will call me a douchebag. I will then call him a douchebag, and we will have a troll party. The trolls will all have party hats.
A week later, when everyone's family has been insulted, a moderator will kill the trolls with fire.
But...trolls are unstoppable...
Wait...I think I see one over there!

![]() |

CourtFool |

I'm saying something controversial. Later, someone with an opposing viewpoint will call me a douchebag.
Except, you are wrong. Do not worry, it is a common mistake among the uneducated. Please read the following biased links so that you may be enlightened.
On second thought, never mind. You obviously do not lack in stubbornness and will refuse to accept truth. Enjoy your ignorance.

bugleyman |

I'm saying something controversial. Later, someone with an opposing viewpoint will call me a douchebag. I will then call him a douchebag, and we will have a troll party. The trolls will all have party hats.
A week later, when everyone's family has been insulted, a moderator will kill the trolls with fire.
Forget it...it's obvious you can't be reasoned with.

bugleyman |

bugleyman wrote:Wait...would you accept a link to MSNBC?Yes.
Conservative* sells guns to children. Personally, I think we should start a probe. :P
* So what if he's a third grader? He broke the law, he must be a conservative, right?

KaeYoss |

I'm saying something controversial. Later, someone with an opposing viewpoint will call me a douchebag. I will then call him a douchebag, and we will have a troll party. The trolls will all have party hats.
A week later, when everyone's family has been insulted, a moderator will kill the trolls with fire.
Amateur. The proper method is to reply to the threat-starting post, which is something quite reasonable and non-controversial with something really mad. Like something no person - even those extremists - could react with less than utter contempt. Then, as soon as someone does go apeshit over that answer, delete your answer, so it seems like the understandably outraged person is attacking something nobody could object to.
Something like this:
OP: "It's so bad animal testing is still around. If only science found something that worked better without harming animals!"
Troll: "Yeah, we should instead test on the unborn foetuses of black people and then abort them shortly before their birth, keeping the black women as breeders for more tests! That's what our country's founders would want."
Outraged reply to that: "How could you say that, you sick bastard? You should go to hell for saying that! Your stupid political crap is not wanted here"
--> *troll deletes his answer, leading to: -->
OP: "It's so bad animal testing is still around. If only science found something that worked better without harming animals!"
Outraged reply to that: "How could you say that, you sick bastard? You should go to hell for saying that! Your stupid political crap is not wanted here"
Too bad the board is moderated too well, and the quoting function will make it not work here. But places where you just write stuff should work.
(Disclaimer: The poster of this message does not condone such diabolic methods of spreading strife and chaos. This is merely a humoristic entry posted for levity. Wink wink nudge nudge go spread mayhem!")

CourtFool |

CourtFool wrote:Isn't he constitutionally protected to own a guy. So what if he's a third grader! It's in the frickin' Constitution!But wait...what if he's an illegal immigrant?
*head explodes*
Oh that is easy. Illegal means he broke the law and should be executed on the spot..you know…'cause only illegal aliens ever break laws.