| tlc_web tlc_web |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
but only because dwarves have a hard enough time having children on their own due to their biology.
*Chuckle*
I wonder who started the tradition in fantasy that long-lived races have fewer children. From a logic point of view I ALWAYS thought this was a stupid way to run their world. For example, in many game worlds elves have like 1 or 2 children it seems over hundreds of years. Seriously how does a species like this even survive let along compete with races that pump out like 5 every 20 years. Now if every elf was a powerful as a dragon, I could see it making sense. But as far as I can tell a young adult elf is just as fragile as a young adult human.
One thing I have always done in my worlds is that long-lived races may take a long time to mature, but they tend to have very large families. A typically dwarven couple over their life span will raise like 10 children to maturity, while an elven couple may have like 20+. Since they have time they typically put a great deal of space between these children, so they typically don't have the next until the current child has reached adolescence and can help raise the next (which prepares them for childrearing). The end result is a growth rate that is a little slower than humans, but no so skewed into ridiculousness (elf woman has 1 child about every 30 years, dwarf woman has 2, human woman has 5 with humans having the highest child mortality rate). Dwarves and elves still look down on humans as breeding like rats, because while a dwarf or elf female may have more over her lifetime, human women crowd them together in what amounts to a litter and then haphazardly race through their upbringing.