Search Posts
Why the racism? Why must I spend hundreds or even thousands of dollars of real money attending Cons in hopes of MAYBE getting a boon that allows me to play a race I love and am familiar with AND is already available in the same resource materials as other "legal" races? I am beside myself with this nonsensical system of race. I cannot find any reasonable justification. Any ideas?
Can we get an OFFICIAL PAIZO ruling here? All the Attack modifiers on the Core Rulebook table are defined somewhere else in the RAW, EXCEPT on higher ground. What "specifically" constitutes higher ground? Is standing on a table "high" enough? If that is true, does a 7' tall orc get higher ground for attacking a halfling? Is sitting on your "high horse" high enough? Can a character make an Acrobatics check for a "long jump" and make a leaping attack then be considered as coming from higher ground or must a "vertical jump" Acrobatics check be made? There are many instances I have seen on the forums of people discussing this and have only seen opinions based on house rules and various forms of logic. For me, this is an issue because I had a 3.5 Barbarian with the "Leap Attack" Feat. I am trying to re-create her in Pathfinder and now I need to know the rules for "On Higher Ground". Preferably something official so I do not have to debate it out with my DM.
Specifically the "Fire Bolt" of the Fire Domain, but applicable to many other Domain special abilities... Does the use of this (SP) domain ability cause attacks of opportunity? Do they ever require Concentration checks? If so, then what is the DC formulae? Do targets get to save vs. this spell-like attack? If so, what is the DC formulae? There is no "spell of the same name" that I could find in the Core Rulebook, so I seek guidance here. Thanks in advance! |
