| esotericist |
Vic Wertz wrote:Explanation of where I went wrong.Hah! That'll teach me to give off-the-cuff opinions without actually putting in the time to run a check on the legal cases and reading the license at least three times rather than once. Sloppy. Thank you for taking the time to point that out.
Ah well, no harm done. I didn't realize that the d20 system underpinning D&D constituted Mechanics either, though obviously I should have.
<...>
Wizards of the Coast doesn't seem to consider Tieflings and Aasimar to be Product Identity.
The 3.5 SRD has Tieflings and Aasimar in it (albeit as monsters under Planetouched, and player races as a footnote).
It's a bit cumbersome to view the original material, and you have to use the wayback machine to view it, but:
http://web.archive.org/web/20160202110448/http://www.wizards.com/default.as p?x=d20/article/srd35
More conveniently, you can use d20srd.org, which has the same content, but I figured you'd be more interested in the source.
Further, look at the SRD5, which also has a very carefully delineated list of what is Product Identity, yet doesn't mention tieflings, despite being in the SRD5.
https://media.wizards.com/2016/downloads/SRD-OGL_V1.1.pdf