WesWagner's page

The Weapon of Awe spell has some rules and grammar inconsistency. I believe the intent of the card is to confer only a single +3 bonus, hence the singular title and it is not Weapon(s) of Awe.... however, read as written, you would get a +3 for each weapon that character plays on a check.

"when that character plays a weapon on a combat check" would be invoked for each weapon (even though it was not a explicit each) because "when" is a conditional phrase that is invoked at each incident of a condition, unless the language is clear that it is referring to potentially plural incidents.

This would need to read for avoidance of doubt, something like:

"Whenever that character plays one more more weapons on a combat check, add 3 to that check."

If I am wrong and this card was intended to be allowed to be played with a sword and dagger and get a total +6 .... I will henceforth refer to it as weapon(s) of awe(somesauce)... but I suspect that is not the case.

Feiya's power to reduce the difficulty of a check seems weak to me ... when compared to say Lem who adds a d4 (average 2.5 and can increase with skill points)

Am I missing something that should be obvious like, "oh this can be done AFTER the dice are rolled because it is not part of assembling the dice pool" or something like that?