TheKingsportCockroach's page

At this point I'm convinced that riding a dragon is the stuff of mythology and legend. That leadership feat? It's really unlikely that someone works up to getting a large sized dragon and by the time you do you'll realize it's going to get annihilated in combat.

Dragons never want to let you ride on them anyway. Every character I've ever made has had the super secret goal of riding a dragon. They always end up insulted or boasting about something.

Slowly, as the madness sets in you'll realize you hate dragons. Always flying around, looking majestic, getting put on banners. They know it too... they know you want to ride around and look like an awesome dragon knight but no.

Still the dream persists until you become a dragon slayer...

Kegasus has always been my go to.

A while ago a friend of mine theorized that high level dwarven transmuters supplied the vast underground cities with infinite sustanace via stone to flesh and fabricate. Stone to flesh cast on just plain old stone turns rock into a cylinder into inert flesh. After that the dwarf would only have to get some tin paper and ink (for the can and label) and fabricate the inert flesh into a can. This dwarven staple is commonly referred to as Spam.

The gems unaffected by stone to flesh were prizes.

So wait... you want to toss deadly on a merciful weapon so it does an extra 1d6 and is still lethal damage? For an extra 16000 gp you can add 1d6 points of damage to a +1 weapon is how I'm reading this. Not going for the +3, not going for holy, just an extra 1d6?

Go ahead, knock yourself out.

As a GM I'd say no but technically Hayato Ken sounds right. Then again most armor abilities are flat payments (like that sexy sexy shadowed) anyway.

I'm currently buying full plate for my fighter in a game right now and saw this and realized I could get the same effect from a b-plate n' kilt.

I...

I just don't want to wear a kilt okay?!

Is that wrong?