| Sadonis |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Nefreet wrote:
Sadonis wrote:Indeed. Considering the rules are meant to be read as conversational English, and not as a symbolic logic equation where words can be parsed for added, unintentional, "RAW" material, I am astounded at the mental acrobatics that many use to twist the rules into deviations such as this.Nefreet wrote:How long did it take you to come up with this post?Oh? Impressed?
Mental acrobatics are a leisurely stroll to a physics major. As a new player, I truly did not intend to open a rift to the Rules Lawyer plane; this is but a casual inquiry earnest to how I'm wired.
Nefreet wrote:
Imagine explaining the rules to a child in preparation for their first game. That's how the game is meant to be read.
Valuable advice that I will keep in mind.