Rogar Granitehammer's page

Alright, I should have two characters up today. Looking at the characters already submitted for group two I think I will present a Wizard and a more front line focused Ranger.

The more rangers like me, the better!

We seem t' be lackin' a wizard 'n a rogue at th' moment, so if'n ye are of a mind to, those might good t' consider. Not that it'll bother me if'n we 'ave two rangers t' lead th' charge, ye understand. Might show th' others 'ow things get done, after all.

Th' DM did mention that we didn't need t' worry about 'aving one o' each of th' primary classes in th' party, so perhaps 'e's planning t' augment with NPCs. So do what ye will 'n we'll see 'ow it works out.

Otm-Shank wrote:

Khaladon, I think you will need to alter your character somewhat, Bondanalloy has stated that he only wants material from the core rulebook. Looks like all archetypes are out...

Detective isn't core? I don't have any of the books myself yet so I don't know. I just go by the SRD (HERE), which anyone can access, so lack of a book shouldn't be a problem for our DM. That said though, of course if he wishes it to be changed it shall be. I kinda think though that a detective is kinda perfect for TOEE. Don't you? ; )

PS Hey Anivar/Pixie and Black Tom. Wass up?

Hey, Khaladon.

Sorry, archetypes are not core. I suspect you can make a pretty detective-like bard or rogue without the archetype, but I'm sure it would be lacking something. Without some study, I don't know the differences -- and I don't have any books with me here.

I'm hoping you, Black Tom, and I succeed in getting into group two just because it's neat to have a familiar 'face' at the table. I guess you two should be in - I think I'm the one on the bubble.

Rogar is statted up. Please let me know of any corrections I need to make.

Rogar Granitehammer, at your service. Once I get the character sheet formatted, I'll paste it in.