Osborn
|
No need. Between open spell slots, cheap scrolls he can scribe for himself, and a reasonable selection of offense/defense/utility spells prepared, a high-level wizard pretty much DOES have what he needs at all times.
No.
He has what he needs whenever he's had time to prepare. If we're even allowing scrolls the whole 'Class features only' thing falls apart. You have cheap scrolls, I have cheap potions. Problem solved.[snip]
Regarding flexible rules, as DM I prefer to adopt more a "tour guide and referee" role and less of a "railroad conductor" role. Again, that's a difference in philosophy. It doesn't require that I use a board game, either -- houstonderek and I are quite pleased with our house rules.
I adopt the same role.
I haven't even mentioned how I run my own games nor what house rules I have. The Druid class is rebuilt entirely, Paladins and Clerics are rebuilt as well as any class that interacts heavily with a religion, Vancian spellcasting has never been a favorite so the entire spellcasting system is reworked, SR is more common but spells are more deadly etc. etc. etc.My house rules fit my group and the style of game I run just fine. Even without all the changes to the base system the game runs fine, its more down to personal preference rather than system "fixes".
If I had a player that didn't have any means of dealing with an opponent I'm sending against him, it is first of all my problem since either I haven't given the player an incentive to seek out such tools or I haven't given him the opportunity to do so. Second...its a problem I can easily solve by setting the encounter in a place where the fighter can still do something useful, even though its not plinking the flying baddie for HP. Third...if your hands are tied on setup and setting perhaps this is an encounter he just has to sit out? Plenty of those in my games, where the brutish barbarian is NOT one to handle a delicate social situation.
