Michael Loy's page

Well, yes. But I quoted the ghost touch property up there. I'll do it again:

The weapon can be picked up and moved by an incorporeal creature at any time. A manifesting ghost can wield the weapon against corporeal foes. Essentially, a ghost touch weapon counts as both corporeal or incorporeal.

That's what the ghost touch property does. I'm looking at the ramifications of that.

Are we niggling that some parts of my body aren't natural attacks? At the very least, I can explicitly do unarmed strikes with "fist, elbows, knees, and feet", and there's that generally understood thing where a monk can make an unarmed strike with any part of his body. At any rate, I'm pretty sure it's fair to include other attacks, headbutts and such, and we must add in any new limbs/attacks I acquire through wild shape.

So even if, say, my calves and sternum are not ghost touch, it still seems like enough of my body is that an incorporeal creature should be able to attack me, bull rush me, whatever. Likewise, if I wild shape into a lion or octopus, my tentacle/claw attack is ghost touch and would allow me to use the associated grab special ability on an incorporeal creature, yes?

You can use a ghost touch chain to trip a ghost (well, they typically fly, but whatever), a ghost touch mancatcher to grapple one, all that. And a ghost can use the disarm maneuver to relieve you of a ghost touch weapon, or it can presumably sunder a ghost touch weapon. When the ghost touch weapons are part of my body, how does that translate?

( The thing about getting natural armor against incorporeal touch attacks probably is reading too much into it, but I just thought I'd toss it out there anyway. As I said, it sounds sketchy. )