BigNorseWolf wrote: So if you have a pixie in magic armor, is that (armor+enhancement)/2 or (armor/2) +enhancement ? You're not asking for a pixie though, are you now? I've usually just tried to avoid asking by instead making do with just a wand of mage armor. I'd lean in favour of the "Enhancement bonuses count in full" camp, but there's enough room for other interpretations it's definitely worth flagging for clarification.
ShieldLawrence wrote: I disagree. He 5' steps, leaving your square and provoking an AoO for Underfoot. You then use Step Up to follow into his square, which provokes on your part for entering his space. Then you get your Step Up and Strike AoO for using Step Up. He gets attacked twice, you get attacked once. That's the trade. You know, I think I'm happy with that interpretation. I wonder if we can get some sort of ruling or consensus on this. Preferably before I play next week and potentially lock in some important feat choices.
Core Rulebook Glossary wrote:
I'm pretty sure Underfoot Assault does make the foe adjacent to you. Grey Mage brings up a good point where the opponent might technically never leave your square, and thus never qualifies for the underfoot assault provoke.
Tiny Creatures provoke FAQ sort of negates the second part of that argument, too... but lends more evidence toward the idea "creatures leaving your square only provoke once, even with both underfoot assault and step-up-and-strike"
Rules question that may decide some of my feat choices... If I'm a mouser swashbuckler in an opponent's square and using Underfoot Assault, and have Step Up and Strike (and Combat Reflexes)... If the opponent takes a five foot step away from me, do I get two attacks of opportunity? (Once for Underfoot Assault, and once for Step Up and Strike) Or do I only get one? (Because the enemy only took a single action) |
