The Scribbler

M4sk's page

8 posts. Alias of Guillaume Branquart.


RSS


Sharka Kendarek.
Lots of 'k' sure, but very good name for a BBEG in a campaign of mine. 10 years after, my players still refer to warlocks as 'sharka-kendarek likes'.


190 it is.

One for me and another for my co-DM buddy. 2 more will probably be ordered by my group as the release gets closer...


Word-nerd ? Love that !
Anyway, thanks for the cancellation of the 'superfluous' subscription and for the info. Long live the Paizo crew ! :)


evilvolus wrote:
M4sk wrote:
(FR 4 ? Please, it's a rape no less !)

Obviously you're unhappy, but ease off on the histronics, please. That's an unbelievably ugly word being thrown around in a very cavalier manner, and I for one am offended.

Your favored gaming setting has been changed in ways you don't like. That's an unpleasant situation, but it is far, far less than a rape.

You're obviously right. My words have gone further than my thougts. I apologize for these harsh words.

I have to say though that I'm not a native english speaker. Please pardon this.

Nonetheless, I remain sad beacuase of the moves of WotC, and very pleased by Paizo's decision.


Not sure this is the right place for this but I realized that I subscribed twice for the Pathfinder Companion Series.

I really like you but I will only nedd one of those so if you could cancel one, it would be great. Thanks in advance !


barbican wrote:

Well, I still support WotC.

This decision is lame. Paizo does a great job of writing adventures, but they do not have the staff to develop and maintain an RPG from the ground up. This decision is just the newest incarnation of grognardism. I think we need to send Erik Mona and the rest to move their lead minis around the sand table.

All that stuff you like about 3.5, the guys who made it are becoming shrill with optimism over the change to 4E.

Pathfinder RPG? Why? How can you hope to regain the balance lost from all the late edition combinations of prestige classes and feats that make a new edition so necessary?

I greatly supported WoTC when 3.0 and the 'relaunch' of 3.5 happened. Fresh air and fresh moves around our tables.

But after that, their products became poorly imagined books full of uninteresting rules whereas third party publishers produced lines, books and settings more and more interesting.

And now, D&D 4 is announced, another way to have players (and RPG compagnies through their petty 5000$ fee) spit their money once again, destroying long loved settings (FR 4 ? Please, it's a rape no less !).

So when I read news for a new exciting setting like Pathfinder full of ideas, energy, adventure and moreover a shared passion, I say 'all aboard !'.

No offence meant but I think WotC really broke the dreams and the pleasure of many gamers around, that's why we can feel so much anger about D&D 4. A feeling that was never that great when the other editions arrived.


Lisa Stevens wrote:

We've talked about this in meetings and think it is a great idea. Josh and his team are going to work on these, but we've been a bit distracted and busy with just a few things lately. :) Watch paizo.com for more info about these in the coming weeks!

-Lisa

Very nice to hear that !


Very nice to hear that some people are not in the all D&D 4process, not taking the players just for consumers but for what they are, players who share the same passion.

Glad to hear that 3.5 will be supported and enhanced through the Pathfinder RPG.