Pontia Runario

Komoda's page

Goblin Squad Member. 1,886 posts. No reviews. No lists. No wishlists.




What happens when a 6th level Brawler has Improved Two-Weapon Fighting and Flurry. Does the Brawler now have the ability to make a second off-hand attack as part of the Flurry?

Does the Brawler have to use a second limb?

When concerning Unarmed Strikes, the Brawler version of Flurry only offers two things: The ability to use one limb, and the TWF tree of feats. (Full Strength on off-hand attacks is also granted under Brawler's Unarmed Strike).

The extra attack comes from the free feat. To exclude the use of the Improved Two-Weapon Fighting feat would be the same as excluding any "exterior" feat, such as weapon focus or power attack, from the attack, would it not?


Is the combination of Brawler/Monk - Shield Champion/Master of Many Styles a legal one?

I am not sure how much Brawler's Flurry and Flurry of Blows interact.

Master of Many Styles requires replacing:
Flurry of Blows
Bonus Feats

Brawler Gets:
Brawler's Flurry
Bonus Combat Feats

Shield Champion requires replacing:
Maneuver Training

Monk Gets:
Maneuver Training

I imagine that the Monk's Maneuver training would be lost due to Shield Champion. But is it legal to take Master of Many Style and keep Brawler's Flurry since they are not named the same thing?

The same goes for the Bonus Combat Feats. Can the character keep the Bonus Combat Feats from Brawler?

Brawler
Shield Champion
Monk
Master of Many Styles


Recently it appears that my Back Button on IE 10.

With multiple tabs open, this is the only site affected.

Any ideas?


In a recent game players were attack by a Glaberzu. It promptly tore them up and they ran.

Given three days down time, they were not able to find any information on the creature. They do not have Knowledge (Planes). Gather Information checks were not high enough to gain any information either.

DM maintains that it is cheesy that a player memorize Banishment as there is no way that player could know to banish it.

Player maintains that is illogical since the player (Cleric 12) can summon demons through the use of Summon Monster I - VI and can identify the spell used to summon the Glaberzu and can even summon a Glaberzu of his own with a scroll of Summon Monster IX.

Player further maintains that he does not need to know it is a Glaberzu, or a demon for that matter. Just that it can be summoned, and therefore that it can be Banished and that if he can summon it, he should clearly be able to know that it can be summoned.

Where do any and all RAW/RAI with regards to creature/spell knowledge (not just the knowledge skills but knowledge in general) and the ability to use spells fall into play in all of this?


In the Carrion Crown AP there is a creature:

Spoiler:
I am not the GM and I forget the name but basically it is an ooze that has a melee attack listed as:

Melee Disintegrating Touch +15 6d6

Does this count as a touch attack or is it required to state ...+15 touch?

Flavor text indicates it dissolves flesh and bone but make no mention of armor.

This is the only attack for the creature. The creature also has Vital Strike. If the above is a touch attack, can Vital Strike apply to a touch attack?

Thanks


I thought this might be useful to some people.

Jade Regent - Book 1 - Part 1 Plot Map.

The image was made using the free program Xmind.