| H |
So, several iterations of APs and such have things like ghouls and undead with barbarian levels, gaining at least the strength bonus from Barbarian rage. Barbarian rage is a Morale bonus, which undead are strictly immune to. I've searched through threads, and there are scant few where people go 'oh it's morale, but why do all these NPCs have undead that rage?' --
Why? Because Barbarian rage being a morale bonus is something that happened with the change to Pathfinder from 3.X. Barbarian rage used to be a flat 'bonus' not a 'morale bonus'. I suppose some people still think it's the case, because they played 3.5, and the Barbarian (and now Bloodrage) rage features read almost exactly the same as how they used to.. just with 'morale' neatly tucked in there.
Can there be an official ruling on this? How would I change NPCs who don't actually benefit from rage, such as several adversaries in the Mummy's Mask AP? I'm not looking at the book, but I even think they swapped over the Con score bonus to Cha!