GamerLocke's page

How would you rule Spellcrafting a spell cast by a druid with Natural Spell. Natural spell says:

"You substitute various noises and gestures for the normal verbal and somatic components of a spell."

My personal opinion is clouded by me not wanting a druid to get free spell-stealth but I also can understand non-druid spellcasters having difficulty in comprehending this type of spellcasting.

Now, without a debate of whether this feat is extremely broken or not, would you allow a fellow spellcaster, we'll say a wizard in this example, to be able to Spellcraft a spell cast by a druid through Natural Spell? And are there any rules stating one way or the other?

Ok, I have been searching the message boards for a good 1-2 hours now, attempting to discover if the age old question of "Is a natural weapon considered an unarmed strike?" I have been unable to locate a definitive answer and am curious if anyone knows anything definitive or has found statements saying so.

Now, I am about to play a Druid with natural weapons when I wild shift and I would like to take a style feat like Tiger Style or Boar Style. Now, putting aside whether you believe an animal could assume these styles when in combat, could I utilize the portions of each feat that include reference to an unarmed attack (ie. Would I be able to cause bleed damage from two successful natural attacks using boar style, wild-shaped as a Dire Tiger).

I fully understand portions of the book that state that an unarmed strike is not a natural attack (Not considering the countless arguments from anything related to monk). What I mainly need to know is, is a natural attack an unarmed attack even if an unarmed attack is not a natural attack?