| Dolomyte |
Three questions. I'll try to leave them short and sweet, although I know no thread on alignment ends up that way.
Chaotic Neutral Rogue was offered money to assassinate an imprisoned crime lords Lieutenant, a known demon supporter / collaborater before an impending war with a demon army. The rogue was unaware of this person, and asked around to determine that A. the person was evil and did deal with demons, and that B. he was a potential threat if left alive. Rogue killed crime lord lieutenant.
Was this act evil?
Same Chaotic Neutral Rogue is present with party when they assault a new city the crime lord has taken over. The party kills crime lords retinue and the mage dominates said crime lord. The party questions the crime lord (who has worked with demons, attempted to kill the party numerous times, murdered countless citizens, and murdered the person the party left in charge of this city after liberating it from a black dragon) and he answers all of their questions. The rogue executes the crime lord for his crimes.
Was this act evil?
The third and final question, EVEN if you consider the above two acts evil, are they enough to change the alignment of said rogue from Chaotic Neutral to Chaotic Evil considering the rogue also. Liberated a city from a black dragon, has worked tirelessly to recruit aid for a city about to be attacked by demons (not her own city), including spending time training the citizens within how to defend their churches. and spent money to res a cohort instead of just taking a new one (which with leveling would have actually been more powerful, though that is metagaming)