Cyhel Ikari's page

I'm not understanding the need for an initiative cap. I'll admit too - I didn't read every post here, just scanned over some of them.

But I would like to add a few things and I'm not sure if they've been brought up or not, so hopefully not repeating anyone.

One duty of a GM is to ensure that the game is fair. According to the rules, it's fair (or so it seems).

Another duty is to ensure the game is enjoyable for all players. This seems to not be the case due to some players monopolizing the game. One thing I can suggest is to split the players into two different tables. Put the monopolizers together and the other players on a different table.

If this is not an option due to table size issues, run a homebrew and a Society table. On the Society table, encourage the monopolizers to use a pre-generated character and remind them that they can use their own characters on the homebrew table. I was able to solve a power-gaming issue in this manner back when I ran D&D homebrew and Encounters.

I'm such a derp. I didn't even to think to look in either of those places... Thank you both for your help!

I'm running Pathfinder Society Adventure Paths now at our local gaming store. I read in the Organized Play Guide that I, as the GM, should distribute and log the characters' Chronicle Pages. However, I can't find the Chronicle Pages for the Reign of Winter Adventure Path. Is there someplace I can download the Chronicle Pages or am I missing something?

Okay, thanks. It's a homebrew game and we were just winging it for the most part. I was just curious on the actual ruling.

They were using four lights to cover the enemy's eyes. I have them one round of blind then -2 on attacks after that.

Okay. Thanks for the info.

So if not granting the blinded condition, would it grant some negatives of some sort? I have a player concentrating four dancing lights orbs around the eyes of an enemy so that the enemy couldn't see past them.

Not sure if it's possible but can you blind a creature with dancing lights?