Charlotte Halcyon's page

Sebastian Hirsch wrote:

jon dehning wrote:

LoPan666 wrote:

That sounds like a very reasonable policy and I heartily endorse it. Locally, we were first told that they would not be approved for conventions held in a retail location, then that they would not be approved unless it was a new event because the RVC wanted to get his VCs to expand out of their comfort zone, then that they would only be approved for events with 100-150 attendees for a new event and 250+ attendees for an established one.

O-O

Sweet Asmodeus! If that were the case here, we’d never be able to run ANY special, EVER.

Wow.

I am moderately certain, that the same would apply to any event in Europe and eastern Europe, potentially excluding 2 large events in the UK.

Assuming we are talking about PFS attendance and not total convention attendance, but to be honest it would be weird to allow something for mixed gaming convention with a 15 slot PFS convention held at the same time and prevent a PFS centric event with 50 tables from offering something.

I honestly have no idea, how many events worldwide would qualify, but I suspect they are in the tens rather than hundreds.

I'd wager there is only a handful of events in the entire world not named Paizo Con or Gen Con that could meet either of those criteria.

Of the conventions in the Southeast region, I believe the only ones that would qualify based on these parameters would be SCARAB, MegaCon, and possibly Dragon*Con.

Do you mean communicating as a retailer, or communicating about a retailer?

As a retailer / brick-and-mortar store.

When it comes to the RDU area of North Carolina, four stores are affected by the recent events unfolding.

While players and other organizers have been expressing their concerns here and elsewhere, I am just wondering what the best method / point of contact a retailer should employ to also express their concerns.

If you feel you have adequately pursued escalating with Tonya, you're always welcome to email community@paizo.com or escalate further to Paizo's executives.

With regards to retailers, should this contact information be used, or is there a more appropriate email for contact?