Maybe I am not telling it right. My scenario has nothing to do with an obstacle. Just 2 enemy creatures. No walls around at all. No obstacles. Say in an open field. One in front of the other. My barbarian knocks one into the other one. I dont follow at all. I stay in the space that I started in. What are the "rules" for what happens if I knock that first creature into the second enemies square? I dont try to push him any farther or I purposefully fail my roll for the second creature. I think 3.5 has rules for creatures ending up in other creatures squares. I think it says that they fall prone. I cant find any rules in Pathfinder that tell me what happens in this situation. If there are no rules in Pathfinder then we will just use 3.5 rules and move on.
Thank you for the responses. So there are no "rules" for failing to "knockbacking" a creature into a creatures space. Correct? Where does it say that a creature becomes an obstacle if you fail your roll on the second creature? Another question is Can any enemy end up in another enemies space or are they automatically shunted to an open square? Another question for your answer above. If a barbarian tries to knockback and creature with another creature behind it and the barbarian chooses to fail that roll, does that mean nothing happens to the first creature? That seems a rather odd result.
This question is not so much a rage power question as it is a bull rush question. If my barbarian knocks a creature back 5 feet into a square occupied by another enemy what is the effect?? I have scanned all over faqs and message boards and the rules and have found nothing. I think there is a rule that the creature pushed falls prone in the enemies square but I cant find anything on this. Please help. Can you reference the books where I can find the rule in question?
Karui Kage wrote: I wouldn't let make whole or greater make whole work on advanced technology. The major cap on abusing the power of tech comes from its limited use, allowing a PC to circumvent that with a relatively low level spell seems wrong. I was hoping James Jacobs would chime in with a unofficial response. Also I think Greater Make whole would be required. Not Make Whole. I think our DM will allow it. James Jacobs kind of by default at least implied that he is ok with it by quoting that exact statement that Greater Make Whole would fix broken disks. I keep a watch here for responses. |