Can someone with a printed copy of the book check to see if this error exists in it as well? If it does, I should probably post it in the errata thread for the Bestiary; if not, I'll post it in the errata thread for the PRD.
Thanx.
Search Posts
As Are points out, the PRD sayeth: Such creatures attack with their weapons normally but treat all of their natural attacks as secondary attacks during that attack, regardless of the attack's original type. But, as Viletta points out, it seems to be wrong one way or the other. I haven't posted in the errata thread yet, no ... just wanted to make sure I wasn't completely missing something. But it seems like we're all in agreement that something's awry, even if there's some disagreement on which thing's wrong. Where's the errata thread?
I've been picking apart the minotaur entry in the Bestiary, because I'm working on a PC race conversion. But there's one thing in the entry I can't seem to explain. Melee greataxe +9/+4 (3d6+6/×3) and gore +4 (1d6+4) Okay, so the greataxe stuff all makes sense, but the gore is a secondary attack, isn't it? That would be why it's +4 instead of +9. Thus: Secondary attacks are made using the creature's base attack bonus –5 and add only 1/2 the creature's Strength bonus on damage rolls. Except that means that the gore damage should be 1d6+2, not 1d6+4, right? What am I missing? TIA. |