|
It seems like this thread is breaking down. The OP and the others that agree with him are basically just ignoring what makes a wizard flexible. When told about the "empty slot" rule it was mostly ignored. That right there is one of the pillars of the wizard flexibility argument. The second thing that was mostly ignored was scribing scrolls. A lot of pro-sorcerer posters basically just said that was too hard or time consuming.
I can understand that you may feel that a sorcerer is simply better, but ignoring all the key reasons why a wizard is more flexible does not mean that the sorcerer is. As many people have already posted the wizard is more flexible because they can leave spell slots open to get just the spell they need, and can have many more spells known that are converted to scrolls for when necessary. I don't see how anyone could argue anything different?