Let's Be Clear

Monday, January 11, 2016

Happy New Year, everyone! As we return from our holiday vacations, John, Tonya, and I have been diving into some projects that have been sitting on the Pathfinder Society back burner for some time. We are happy to announce the release of the first of these projects—the Pathfinder Society Campaign Clarifications Document.

As anyone who has ever seen the official list of Additional Resources knows, Pathfinder Society characters have many options. As anyone who is a regular on our forums knows, some of these options can be interpreted in different ways. When these rules ambiguities crop up in a home campaign, where a player is likely to have only one GM, the GM and the player can work together to find a satisfying solution. In the organized play campaign, where players are likely to have many GMs over the course of each character’s adventures, these ambiguities can lead to substantially different rules interpretations from table to table. We created this document to help reach one of goals of organized play—to provide an equitable gaming experience to players all over the world. The Clarifications Document is a centralized place for us to offer official rulings for ambiguous rules.

Many of these interpretations are the suggestions of the developers who worked on the rules in the first place, which have until now been unofficial posts on the messageboards. Others come out of Additional Resources, which we will be trimming down a bit in the next update. The last source is a list of ambiguities I’ve been saving until we had a clear plan for how to address them. I’m sure some of you will notice a couple of rules elements mentioned in the Clarifications Document that are not currently legal in Pathfinder Society. These elements will appear in our next update of Additional Resources.

While GMs are free to use clarifications from this document in their home campaigns if they wish, these are not official errata. The Clarifications Document principally addresses rules material that appears in softcover sources such as the Pathfinder Campaign Setting and Pathfinder Player Companion lines, rather than the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game hardcover books. As part of our Additional Resources process, we plan to revisit this document each month and make changes if necessary. What rules ambiguities have you seen in your Pathfinder Society games that you would like to see resolved?

Download the Campaign Clarifications Document — (8.43mb zip/PDF)

Linda Zayas-Palmer
Assistant Developer

More Paizo Blog.
Tags: Pathfinder Campaign Setting Pathfinder Player Companion Pathfinder Society
351 to 400 of 810 << first < prev | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | next > last >>
4/5 **

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Thanks, TOZ, for making sure it gets into the new Guide. For myself, I will start allowing rerolls on nat 1's, based on John's comments on Facebook (which somebody showed me - I don't go to the PFS Facebook page any more... that way madness lies.) I picked up the habit at my first PaizoCon, when it was done at my table... back when I was young and impressionable, I guess!

Shadow Lodge 4/5

We're all mad out there.

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

BigNorseWolf wrote:
Steven Schopmeyer wrote:

The VO team responsible for Roleplaying Guild Guide...

Not a clarification but... is that name sticking at all?

No.

4/5 **

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I think it has stuck for the folks who play the card game, and for the Paizo folks who want to push the card game. I don't think it has changed in the minds of the vast number of PFS'ers, though.

But then, we changed the name of our museum here 20+ years ago, and still get referred to by the old name.

3/5 5/5

Can the grit from the Amateur Swashbuckler feat be used for deeds obtained from Gunslinger class levels?

Liberty's Edge 4/5 5/55/5 **

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Maps, Pathfinder Accessories Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Charter Superscriber; Starfinder Charter Superscriber
BigNorseWolf wrote:
Steven Schopmeyer wrote:

The VO team responsible for Roleplaying Guild Guide...

Not a clarification but... is that name sticking at all?

Hmmm, My File for the most recent guide I name Guide to Pathfinder Society Organized Play 7-0 not Pathfinder Society Roleplaying Guild Guide 7-0. That would cause all type of alphabetical order problems!

3/5 5/5

Can a rail gun be used with either dead shot, vital strike or both?

The Exchange 3/5

FiddlersGreen wrote:
Can a rail gun be used with either dead shot, vital strike or both?

Dead Shot says firearm and the rail gun is Heavy Weaponry. Vital Strike doesn't care about such things. This is more a rules forum thing I believe though.

3/5 5/5

Ragoz wrote:
FiddlersGreen wrote:
Can a rail gun be used with either dead shot, vital strike or both?
Dead Shot says firearm and the rail gun is Heavy Weaponry. Vital Strike doesn't care about such things. This is more a rules forum thing I believe though.

It's been asked before, but with varying opinions, hence why a ruling for PFS would be welcome. Hence why I asked it in this thread.

The Exchange 3/5

FiddlersGreen wrote:
Ragoz wrote:
FiddlersGreen wrote:
Can a rail gun be used with either dead shot, vital strike or both?
Dead Shot says firearm and the rail gun is Heavy Weaponry. Vital Strike doesn't care about such things. This is more a rules forum thing I believe though.
It's been asked before, but with varying opinions, hence why a ruling for PFS would be welcome. Hence why I asked it in this thread.

I'm surprised there would be another opinion considering if it wasn't the case than techslinger's 11th level ability would be useless.

Quote:
Heavy Weaponry Deeds (Ex) At 11th level, as long as the techslinger has at least 1 grit point, she can treat a heavy weapon as a firearm for the purpose of using deeds

Sovereign Court 2/5 RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.
FiddlersGreen wrote:
Can the grit from the Amateur Swashbuckler feat be used for deeds obtained from Gunslinger class levels?

For that matter, there's a number of corner cases like that. Can a Spirit Guide Oracle take Extra Hex? Can a skald take Extra Rage Power and share it via his raging song? Can an inquisitor or cleric take an animal domain? Can a ninja take rogue archetypes? Those can be fundamental parts of a build and they're all ETV, as far as I can tell.

Silver Crusade 4/5

Kurald Galain wrote:
FiddlersGreen wrote:
Can the grit from the Amateur Swashbuckler feat be used for deeds obtained from Gunslinger class levels?

For that matter, there's a number of corner cases like that. Can a Spirit Guide Oracle take Extra Hex? Can a skald take Extra Rage Power and share it via his raging song? Can an inquisitor or cleric take an animal domain? Can a ninja take rogue archetypes? Those can be fundamental parts of a build and they're all ETV, as far as I can tell.

I can't answer most of these, but the question about inquisitors and clerics is pretty straightforward. They can take any domain offered by their deity. To my knowledge, none of them offer the druid animal domains, so you won't see any clerics or inquisitors with those domains.

1/5

Consider that there is a feat for Clerics and an archetype for Inquisitors, I would imagine that animal and terrain domains are not normally legal options for them.

3/5 5/5

Ragoz wrote:
FiddlersGreen wrote:
Ragoz wrote:
FiddlersGreen wrote:
Can a rail gun be used with either dead shot, vital strike or both?
Dead Shot says firearm and the rail gun is Heavy Weaponry. Vital Strike doesn't care about such things. This is more a rules forum thing I believe though.
It's been asked before, but with varying opinions, hence why a ruling for PFS would be welcome. Hence why I asked it in this thread.

I'm surprised there would be another opinion considering if it wasn't the case than techslinger's 11th level ability would be useless.

Quote:
Heavy Weaponry Deeds (Ex) At 11th level, as long as the techslinger has at least 1 grit point, she can treat a heavy weapon as a firearm for the purpose of using deeds

Ragoz, I think the question revovles more around the fact that firing a rail gun is a full round action rather than a standard action, and whether this prevents it from being used with Dead Shot and/or Vital Strike.

Dead Shot says he "makes as many attack rolls as she can, based on her base attack bonus". Based on BAB, you should be able to take at least 2 attacks based on BAB on a full attack when you get this deed, but regardless of BAB you can only fire a rail gun once per round, so that can be read either way.

Vital strike might be a little less ambiguous, since it simply references taking an 'attack action'. In the case of a rail gun, an attack action is a full round, but this might just mean that you can take a full round action to make a vital strike attack with a rail gun.

Liberty's Edge 4/5 5/5

The Rondelero Swashbuckler archetype has an ability called 'Falcata Emphasis' that gives 'proficiency in falcatas'. Does this count as having the feat 'Exotic Weapon Proficiency (falcata)' for the purpose of things that have the latter as a prerequisite?

More context

EDIT: After further consideration, this isn't as ambiguous as I first thought, and the answer is firmly in the 'yes' camp (see evidence at link above). Consider the request for clarification withdrawn ;-)

Dark Archive 4/5 5/5 ****

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Kurald Galain wrote:
FiddlersGreen wrote:
Can the grit from the Amateur Swashbuckler feat be used for deeds obtained from Gunslinger class levels?

For that matter, there's a number of corner cases like that. Can a Spirit Guide Oracle take Extra Hex? Can a skald take Extra Rage Power and share it via his raging song? Can an inquisitor or cleric take an animal domain? Can a ninja take rogue archetypes? Those can be fundamental parts of a build and they're all ETV, as far as I can tell.

It would be good to clarify that Skalds cannot share rage powers gained from the Extra Rage Power feat.

1/5

Pathfinder PF Special Edition Subscriber
BigNorseWolf wrote:
TomG wrote:
Did a quick scan, and didn't see this one mentioned yet: Humans trying to take Racial Heritagae(kitsune) and Fox Shape feats.

That one is an absolute no for pfs. Fox shape is only available in the additional resources to kitsune, so whether you see it as a seperate ability or an add on to change shape is irrelevant, it doesn't work in PFS.

(see note above about racial heritage needing a BIG asterix)

I agree with you. But not everyone does.

The argument goes something like "Racial Heritage(Kitsune)" is written that a character counts as Kitsune for the purposes of taking feats, thus, they count as Kitsune for the purposes of Additional Resources restricting feats to Kitsune characters (because they "are" a Kitsune character for the purpose of feats). As I said, I disagree with the reasoning. Still, many threads have argued for pages (and even seen locks) on this issue.

But as the point of this thread is to bring up questions that clarity would assist, instead of offering your opinion on the answer, I'd appreciate support in convincing the powers that be to address the question. :-)

5/5 5/55/55/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
TomG wrote:
But as the point of this thread is to bring up questions that clarity would assist, instead of offering your opinion on the answer, I'd appreciate support in convincing the powers that be to address the question. :-)

At that level of rules lawyering shennanigans its not clarity they're looking for.

Silver Crusade 1/5 Contributor

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I'm not sure terms like that help the discourse stay productive. The point of this document is to clarify where there are differences of opinion. Something that has been so vigorously debated clearly needs to be addressed in some fashion.

The Exchange 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

re-posting the thread purpose (as I see it)

nosig wrote:

...

Reading thru the Blog post I notice the following point of interest...

... Pathfinder Society Campaign Clarifications Document...

...Pathfinder Society characters have many options....
...some of these options can be interpreted in different ways...
...these ambiguities can lead to substantially different rules interpretations from table to table...
...created this document to ...
...provide an equitable gaming experience to players all over the world. The Clarifications Document is a centralized place for us to offer official rulings for ambiguous rules....

...these are not official errata...
...principally addresses rules material that appears in softcover sources...rather than the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game hardcover books. ...

...What rules ambiguities have you seen in your Pathfinder Society games that you would like to see resolved?

SO, it looks like this post is mainly dealing with "rules ambiguities" when dealing with PFS Character options in softcover books. Is that correct?

4/5 5/5 **** Venture-Lieutenant, Massachusetts—Boston Metro

nosig wrote:

re-posting the thread purpose (as I see it)

nosig wrote:

...

Reading thru the Blog post I notice the following point of interest...

... Pathfinder Society Campaign Clarifications Document...

...Pathfinder Society characters have many options....
...some of these options can be interpreted in different ways...
...these ambiguities can lead to substantially different rules interpretations from table to table...
...created this document to ...
...provide an equitable gaming experience to players all over the world. The Clarifications Document is a centralized place for us to offer official rulings for ambiguous rules....

...these are not official errata...
...principally addresses rules material that appears in softcover sources...rather than the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game hardcover books. ...

...What rules ambiguities have you seen in your Pathfinder Society games that you would like to see resolved?

SO, it looks like this post is mainly dealing with "rules ambiguities" when dealing with PFS Character options in softcover books. Is that correct?

No. Its any material.

The Exchange 5/5

MadScientistWorking wrote:
nosig wrote:

re-posting the thread purpose (as I see it)

nosig wrote:

...

Reading thru the Blog post I notice the following point of interest...

... Pathfinder Society Campaign Clarifications Document...

...Pathfinder Society characters have many options....
...some of these options can be interpreted in different ways...
...these ambiguities can lead to substantially different rules interpretations from table to table...
...created this document to ...
...provide an equitable gaming experience to players all over the world. The Clarifications Document is a centralized place for us to offer official rulings for ambiguous rules....

...these are not official errata...
...principally addresses rules material that appears in softcover sources...rather than the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game hardcover books. ...

...What rules ambiguities have you seen in your Pathfinder Society games that you would like to see resolved?

SO, it looks like this post is mainly dealing with "rules ambiguities" when dealing with PFS Character options in softcover books. Is that correct?

No. Its any material.

Why do you think that?

Where does it say it deals with anything other than what it says it deals with?

Grand Lodge 4/5

nosig wrote:
MadScientistWorking wrote:
nosig wrote:

re-posting the thread purpose (as I see it)

nosig wrote:

...

Reading thru the Blog post I notice the following point of interest...

... Pathfinder Society Campaign Clarifications Document...

...Pathfinder Society characters have many options....
...some of these options can be interpreted in different ways...
...these ambiguities can lead to substantially different rules interpretations from table to table...
...created this document to ...
...provide an equitable gaming experience to players all over the world. The Clarifications Document is a centralized place for us to offer official rulings for ambiguous rules....

...these are not official errata...
...principally addresses rules material that appears in softcover sources...rather than the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game hardcover books. ...

...What rules ambiguities have you seen in your Pathfinder Society games that you would like to see resolved?

SO, it looks like this post is mainly dealing with "rules ambiguities" when dealing with PFS Character options in softcover books. Is that correct?

No. Its any material.

Why do you think that?

Where does it say it deals with anything other than what it says it deals with?

Quote:
The Clarifications Document principally addresses rules material that appears in softcover sources such as the Pathfinder Campaign Setting and Pathfinder Player Companion lines, rather than the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game hardcover books.

Note that this does not prohibit them from dealing (or having to deal) with rules ambiguities that crop up when using softcover books and rules interactions with material in hardcover sources.

Example: Wand Wielder arcana for the Magus. Explicitly allows the Magus to use Spell Combat with a wand. Does not cover the interactions with Spellstrike, if the spell would be one that could normally be used to Spellstrike with, like a wand of Shocking Grasp.

Do you have to track the source of a spell, on later rounds, to note if the Magus has to use a non-weapon touch attack with it, or a regular weapon Spellstrike with it, even if the spell is on their list, if it was cast from a wand, staff, scroll, or other class spell slot?

How about if the spell came from a spell storing item, that the Magus originally cast the spell into? How does that work with Spellstrike?

Shadow Lodge 4/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.
BigNorseWolf wrote:
At that level of rules lawyering shennanigans its not clarity they're looking for.

See, the thing is, based on the actual material, those that disagree with you see YOUR view as the one that jumping through all sorts of rules lawyering hoops and pulling shenanigans to push their own agenda.

There was already at least 1 massive thread about this subject, and while I appreciate you having made up your mind on what anyone that reads the same things you do and has a different view or ruling on what it says, some people would actually just like to not have table variation on this or similar things.

So, again, can we please stop trying to skew things with personal points of view and agenda and let it be decided upon based on it's own merits.

4/5 5/5 **** Venture-Lieutenant, Massachusetts—Boston Metro

1 person marked this as a favorite.
nosig wrote:
MadScientistWorking wrote:
nosig wrote:

re-posting the thread purpose (as I see it)

nosig wrote:

...

Reading thru the Blog post I notice the following point of interest...

... Pathfinder Society Campaign Clarifications Document...

...Pathfinder Society characters have many options....
...some of these options can be interpreted in different ways...
...these ambiguities can lead to substantially different rules interpretations from table to table...
...created this document to ...
...provide an equitable gaming experience to players all over the world. The Clarifications Document is a centralized place for us to offer official rulings for ambiguous rules....

...these are not official errata...
...principally addresses rules material that appears in softcover sources...rather than the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game hardcover books. ...

...What rules ambiguities have you seen in your Pathfinder Society games that you would like to see resolved?

SO, it looks like this post is mainly dealing with "rules ambiguities" when dealing with PFS Character options in softcover books. Is that correct?

No. Its any material.

Why do you think that?

Where does it say it deals with anything other than what it says it deals with?

Because I read the document and it deals with any confusing material present up and including stuff from Occult Adventures which is a hardcover book. Mind you Occult Adventures is probably a one off scenario but there is a lot of weirdly confusing stuff in there that would have pretty drastic table variation. For example, the Promethean Alchemist needs rules for bleeding yourself (Given somewhere in the forum simple enough), needs elaboration because of typography errors (The chart doesn't match text. Simple enough to go with text but still worth elaborating), and Im not sure if the homunculus damages the Alchemist upon its death like the monster entry says.

Shadow Lodge 4/5

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Don't know if it's been pointed out yet, but signifer (as in Hellknight Signifer) is misspelled as signifier. Personal pet peeve.

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.

^ there was clearly table variation regarding pronunciation...

...or at least there was, until this document was released...

...now it's "signifier", whether we agree with it or not.

Grand Lodge 4/5 5/5 *

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Is the clarification document the place to put a clarification on all the 3.5 items on the season 0 chronicles?

Grand Lodge 2/5 **

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

Not sure if this one has been/would be covered.

Extra Reservoir feat..

Are these three extra points there every morning when you prepare your spells? It's been FAQ requested, multiple times, but no response of any kind yet.

Silver Crusade 1/5 Contributor

Mystic Lemur wrote:
Don't know if it's been pointed out yet, but signifer (as in Hellknight Signifer) is misspelled as signifier. Personal pet peeve.

I've been pronouncing it "sig-ni-fi-er" this entire time.

Oops. ^_^

(Although, as I write this, I note that spellcheck flags signifer but is OK with signifier. Maybe that's the cause...)

Liberty's Edge 4/5 5/5

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Kalindlara wrote:

I've been pronouncing it "sig-ni-fi-er" this entire time.

Oops. ^_^

Same here; I didn't even know signifer was a word.

Silver Crusade 1/5 Contributor

Matt Lewis wrote:
Kalindlara wrote:

I've been pronouncing it "sig-ni-fi-er" this entire time.

Oops. ^_^

Same here; I didn't even know signifer was a word.

It makes more sense now that I look it up, especially in the context of the Hellknights and their links to Ancient Jistka. (I <3 Ancient Jistka.)

Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—San Francisco Bay Area North & East

Matt Lewis wrote:
Kalindlara wrote:

I've been pronouncing it "sig-ni-fi-er" this entire time.

Oops. ^_^

Same here; I didn't even know signifer was a word.

I'd missed it too. Hmm, it flows well with a redneck accent, but I normally use that for River Kingdoms or Andoran.

The Exchange 5/5 RPG Superstar 2014 Top 32

Maybe get a ruling on how harrow decks can be enchanted for use with the Deadly Dealer feat?

1. What special materials can decks be made out of? Standard decks of playing cards mention that they could be made of a variety of materials including thin sheets of metal, but harrow decks only mention parchment and paper.

2. Does the fact that the decks are enchanted as ranged weapons with 54 pieces of ammunition change the pricing at all? Since ammunition is usually enchanted in lots of 50.

Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—San Francisco Bay Area North & East

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'd like a clarification on how the Whirlwind monster ability works.

3/5 5/5

James Anderson wrote:
I'd like a clarification on how the Whirlwind monster ability works.

What about it seems unclear?

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Paladin of Baha-who? wrote:
James Anderson wrote:
I'd like a clarification on how the Whirlwind monster ability works.
What about it seems unclear?

For starters:

"Creatures one or more size categories smaller than the whirlwind "

it doesn't say one or more sizes smaller than the creature. It says one or more sizes smaller than the whirlwind. So how big is the whirlwind?

We can sort of back engineer the answer from the storm kindler prestige class which gets the ability to whirlwind at different sizes at different levels, and lists what size they can pick up at different levels.

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Oh yeah.

Is whirlwind a polymorph effect? Do you turn into a whirlwind (in which case your body type has changed and your armor goes away and your size goes up, and your AC tanks.) or does the whirlwind form around you?

What happens when you grapple a whirlwind?

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

1 person marked this as a favorite.

And the whole "I whirlwind the Barbarian 40ft towards the enemy, drop him, and he full attacks".

Grand Lodge 4/5 ****

Nefreet wrote:
And the whole "I whirlwind the Barbarian 40ft towards the enemy, drop him, and he full attacks".

90 feet. Air elementals have a 100 fly speed.

And you are forgetting "That's my move action, So for my standard I ready an action and if anyone trys to hit him I whirlwind him back out of danger"

:P

Lets be honest, is it really any worse than a pouncing natural attack barbarian?

Dark Archive

I'd like clarification on the Inspire Imitation Alternate Trait (from Heroes of the Streets.) As far as I can tell, it's PFS legal... Except it's not because it replaces a racial trait that Half-Elves don't have.

Here is my thread on the issue.

Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—San Francisco Bay Area North & East

I use a storm kindler, so these questions (and those above) have come up.

Also on what people are allowed to do while in a whirlwind? It says they can't move, not that they can't take a move action. Does this mean only purely mental actions, with the listed spellcasting penalty? Seems unlikely as they have penalties to attack rolls.

What limits (besides no "normal" attacks) are applied to the user's actions? What is their condition? (Incorporeal, elemental traits, what about their AC + wild armor, etc).

I've normally wild shaped into something Huge for the strength bonus - does my current size/shape impact anything? Per Storm Kindler: aside from the strength increase, none of it changes anything. I'm still a 5x15x30 frustrum. But for other things that somehow get it (could an air elemental be polymorphed into something and still have its ability? IDK)

Do people without flying get any sort of save to get out once captured?

It says you don't provoke attacks of opportunity - is that only for movement, or period?

Since it's moving through a square to hit someone, there's nothing preventing you from moving back and forward through their square multiple times until you successfully pick them up. Some GM's dislike this concept.

The volume of a 5'd x 15'd x 30'h frustrum is 2550 cubic feet. The volume of a medium creature is 5x5x5 = 125 cubic feet. So in theory I can carry just over 20 people. Or is the calculation different somehow?

5/5 5/55/55/5

Barding: how to pay for

special materials
Armor smaller than small or bigger than large

Shadow Lodge 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—San Francisco Bay Area North & East

When using armor with the Wild enchantment while Wild Shaped into something that flies, does the armor prevent you from flying per the barding rules? What about for shapes with magical flight like air elementals?

5/5 *****

James Anderson wrote:
When using armor with the Wild enchantment while Wild Shaped into something that flies, does the armor prevent you from flying per the barding rules? What about for shapes with magical flight like air elementals?

It shouldn't do. Armour on its own does not prevent flight. You would be taking the ACP to your fly skill. Medium or Heavy Barding would prevent a flying mount from flying but armour is not barding and widlshaped druids are not mounts.

3/5 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Psychic-bloodline sorcerer - is it still an "arcane spellcasting class"?

Is 'arcane spellcaster class' defined independently of the bloodline arcana? Is the psychic sorcerer a psychic-caster, arcane caster or both for the purposes of items and abilities that refer to one or the other?

Silver Crusade 4/5 5/55/55/5 RPG Superstar 2013 Top 8

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Does a tattooed mystic gain Inscribe Magical Tattoo and the ability to use it? See this thread.

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento

2 people marked this as a favorite.

How much does it cost to Lead line a container

Many detects and other effects are blocked by a thin lining of lead. Yet there are no rules for actually getting a box, sheath, or other container lined in lead, so only NPCs can use that tactic.

5/5 5/55/55/5

4 people marked this as a favorite.

Can a hunter just not take an animal and declare it dead or do they have to commit a Druids local 704 violation and get it killed to get the benefit?

Liberty's Edge 5/5 5/5 *** Venture-Lieutenant, Indiana—Martinsville

TomG wrote:
Did a quick scan, and didn't see this one mentioned yet: Humans trying to take Racial Heritagae(kitsune) and Fox Shape feats.

To be honest, I would like to be able to take other race feats as long as it is available in the Additional Resources, even for boon races. The Goblin feats in particular should be opened up for those taking Racial Heritage or Adopted for the Traits.

But for the specific, the character would still need a way to effect the change, shapeshifting is not given to the character by the feat alone. (only a new form for the Shapeshifting is). The clarification about Tail Slap and the interaction between Racial Heritage and unusual combonations should be clarified, but I am thinking it should be a regular FAQ, with an ongoing list of race feats/traits that have abilities not inferred to characters without abilities that the feat is based on and uses. (Not giving a tail to a human, for example)

Going into a different subject, I think a clarification that the race traits (Racial?) are no longer a part of the four basic categories since Ultimate Campaign needs to be addressed. (I currently have my second Tengu with Adopted(Gnome) with Etymologist gnome trait)

351 to 400 of 810 << first < prev | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / Paizo Blog: Let's Be Clear All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.