Anguish wrote:
Megistone wrote:
3-Body Problem wrote:
Sandal Fury wrote:
No sugar coating: a line has to be drawn somewhere. At a certain point, sensibilities need to be recognized as too delicate and, frankly, beneath consideration.
This topic is past that point.
Why must that be the case? Especially in terms of what a company puts into a game that has inclusivity as a cornerstone of its design ethos.
Would you be inclusive of people who despise violence by removing fights from the game? Would you be inclusive of people who don't like the letter 's' by removing that letter from the rules?
Come on. Your equivalence paints a picture I don't think you want painted.
People who despise violence are well-meaning but not the target demographic for this game. Accommodating them would be nice, but isn't practical.
Congratulations, you just drew a line demarking what kind of people is not worth striving to include.