| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
In general that should all work fine.
One thing to be aware of for the second character is the difference between a Wizard with Summoner archetype and a Summoner with Wizard archetype.
The Wizard with Summoner archetype will have a lot more spellcasting power - but the Eidolon will be mostly only usable out of combat. You don't ever get Act Together or any other Tandem feats that increase your action usage during combat. So having the Eidolon do anything is at a pretty steep cost.
The Summoner with Wizard archetype will have a lot more focus on the Eidolon. It will be easily at least half of what you spend your time in combat using. However, you won't have nearly as much spellcasting power. A couple or four combat spell slots, and a few utility slots from the Wizard archetype.
Either can work just fine - just be aware of the differences and pick the one appropriate for the character and your goals.
|
For your kobold, don't forget skills and skill feats. You get a skill feat every even level, plus lip reading from your background. It's unusual that your heritage is blue, but your dragon disciple is gold. It's perfectly legal, but you might ask your dm about it.
Summoner is one of the more complex classes in pf2e, but I really like your concept. I might suggest a summoner with sorcerer archetype would be more powerful. You would be charisma casting for both.
For skills/skill feats on your kobold, look into Intimidation and the related feats such as Intimidating Glare, Terrifying Resistance, Battle Cry, and Scare to Death. Your 18 CHA will make Demoralizing easier and Frightened is one of the better conditions to apply. Plus, it makes sense for a psuedo-Dragon to be terrifying, though it would be interesting to see what he thinks of a servant doing that.
It is a heavy investment though when you also want to be keeping up your Arcana skill, probably.
| 5 people marked this as a favorite. |
combat-optimal isn't the same thing as fun-optimal.