I guess the first thing that comes to mind would be just allocating each Part of a chapter to a different person to run. For example, Chapter Two is split (in the hardcover) into seven parts, so Bob could be assigned Parts 1 & 2, Jan could be assigned Parts 3 & 4, etc. It's not a perfect solution as some parts might be longer or shorter, and of course actual play doesn't always proceed in sequence, but it's the most natural division I can think of.
I guess if you're playing, all I can say without spoilers is that Chapter Two is a big mystery chapter, and it's going to be pretty hard to run chunks of it without getting spoiled on the whodunnit. Instead of splitting up chunks of each chapter, could you just have one person commit to Chapter 2, someone else commit to Chapter 3, etc.? That'd provide a much smoother experience.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
(There are no actual RotR spoilers in this post, it's just broad generalisations and made-up examples.)
Spoilers for whoever is GMing any part are going to inevitable.
The AP books tend to start with an overview in each book that says "In this book, PCs will discover that Lord Phileus is murdering children to offer their blood to the Sacred Circle (see Book 3). After finding a series of clues at the old lumbermill, the PCs will confront Lord Phileus in the haunted tower of Doom. Phileus is taking orders from Archmage Clarke, the main antagonist of the campaign."
And that's on a good one. If you're unlucky, it might read "Phileus is taking orders from Archmage Clarke, who seeks to use the children's blood to open a portal to the plane of Dis to retrieve his lost love's soul, which the PCs will discover in Book 5 when they enter Dis themselves".
If you had to do it, I'd do it book by book. You GM book 1, they GM book 2, player 3 GMs book 3, etc, etc. Even within each individual book, you'll find in Part 1 notes that read "The PCs find a note covered in blood. While they can't discover it now, they'll learn in Part 3 that it was written by Lord Phileus when they compare his handwriting", or "Lord Phileus casts Glitterdust. If reduced to half his hit points, he'll attempt to flee via Teleport to the secret Circle room, hidden in Room D14 of Part 7". The APs are just not designed to be read and run by multiple people. These sorts of spoilers are pretty routine.
I'd also change APs and use something where each part is very self-contained. Shattered Star's whole presume is "Get the six magical MacGuffins, which are in 6 largely unrelated dungeons", making each one a much more self contained module with links between them.
Well, you've presumably at this point read Book 1: Burnt Offerings. That Book already tells you several things that spoil both itself and the upcoming adventure.
- That Karzoug and Mokurian are the bad guys, a wizard and a stone giant.
- Sandpoint will be attacked by goblins.
- Aldern Foxglove will 'play an important role' in the second adventure, that he is obsessive and dangerous.
- Shayless Vinder leads to trouble and little reward for the PCs.
- There's a spare goblin hiding in the closet.
- There are five major goblin tribes who could be responsible for the attack... but of course, the book tells you exactly which one it is, right in the section before where you're investigating them.
- The goblins are secretly led by Nualia and a surprise barghest.
- The Sihedron medallion is not the nice treasure it appears to be, but a bad idea, something PCs likely won't discover on their own for several books.
All this in a Book that expressly calls out that it has little to do with the overarching metaplot, so this should be considered a relatively low level of spoilers for each book. That's assuming you deliberately don't read the Adventure Outlines and Upcomings, because those tell you who the bad guy is, what he's doing, why, and how he'll do it, where the PCs go, and what they'll need to do to foil him.
So it's not 'some event you have no context for', it's often (fake, made-up non spoilers) "Phileus spent his life secretly worshipping Norgobor as a cleric, but is now in the thrall of Karzoug, and will do everything in his power to stop the PCs reaching the Cap of Eternity hidden beneath Magnimar in Book 4". So I know who the bad guy is, why he's acting, what he'll do, and a bit about his class levels. The second my PC meets Phileus in Book 2, he already knows all these things.
I mean, if you don't care and that works for your group, it'll probably work fine. If you just skip through any mystery, discovery or investigations phases it'll work fine, although I think Shattered Star would work better as unrelated dungeon crawls.
I don't want to speak for Reverse, but I think the reason your plans seem hard to conceptualise is that spoilers are laced throughout the APs on the assumption that a single GM is running the whole thing and needs to be able to plan ahead. I completely understand that you deserve a break from GMing, and it's disappointing that someone else can't step up and give you that. I also understand you don't want a general "don't do it" response.
My only suggestion, and then I'll just let it lie, is that it might be better for everyone concerned in your group not to do an AP at all. Have everyone take turns, round-robin style, running a short module or PFS Scenario, with part of the fun and challenge being how a new GM ties together what's happened previously into an ongoing narrative--the "chain novel" idea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chain_novel
That way, no one's spoiled, everyone gets a chance to play and to GM, and you have a truly unique overall story that will be lots of fun to construct even if it doesn't hold together as perfectly as an AP. Just an idea!