| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
The Core Rule book says: "The GM determines whether you can use reactions before your first turn begins, depending on the situation in which the encounter happens."
But I can´t find any guidelines to make this decision. Is it a total GM Fiat, case by case? Or are there abilities and things that allow you to have or not have reactions before your first turn?
Can someone point me to some rule?
Thanks in advance
There are various monsters and traps which have reactions that occur before initiative is rolled. So those are explicit. I don't think players have any such abilities.
One commonly used rule of thumb is "would the character have been aware of the trigger?" Dodging a attack from someone who successfully rolled stealth for initiative who you are flatfooted against? Probably not gonna work.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Like Morgan and Andrew: I only forbid reactions during the first turn if the characters were absolutely not aware that combat could occur or that this enemy even exist. Otherwise, you can use your reactions as usual.
|
I've encountered many players and GMs online who erroneously believe there's a default rule of "no reactions before your turn", so I always ask a GM I've never played with before what their ruling is, and I lead my question with, "The Core Rulebook tells us it's up to the GM to...", then go from there.
I think it's important to point out that there's no default rule about being flatfooted before one's first turn (which there was in PF1).
So people begin at their full capacity unless there's an exceptional reason (as noted above).
Hopefully at your table it's not GM fiat (arbitrary choice), but rather GM interpretation/adjudication only taking away an ability your PC has for unusual circumstances (reasoned choice).
With so many creatures using Stealth saying "Yes" as the default might have been misleading; those exceptions are pretty common, especially in a thieves' guild where they also will make you flatfooted if they're Rogues.
it is clear that you are not flat footed before you have acted barring something like surprise attacks. Whether you have your reaction or not is an entirely different question as you normally only gain reactions in encounter mode at the start of your turn.
For some GMs, it is NOT clear. Especially for GMs who have spent years running PF1
If a GM erroneously believes that people are flat-footed before their turn, then they are likely to make a different ruling than a GM who believes that people aren't flat-footed.
It is quite relevant to bring that up with a GM when discussing how they make decisions about characters having a reaction before their first turn.
Since being flat-footed was also what prevented attacks of opportunity and immediate actions in 1st edition, it is an equivalent rule. And we know that assuming things from 1E is an easy way to make mistakes in 2E.
So while the 1E "flat-footed before your 1st turn" rule is not relevant to how 2E works, it can be relevant to a list of the rough spots people have in making the system transition. People made the same kind of faulty assumption that things were the same as 1E when going to Starfinder, where you can't take reactions before you act in combat, but aren't flat-footed and easier to hit.
I think it's important to point out that there's no default rule about being flatfooted before one's first turn (which there was in PF1).No-one is talking about being flat footed, it is clear that you are not flat footed before you have acted barring something like surprise attacks. Whether you have your reaction or not is an entirely different question as you normally only gain reactions in encounter mode at the start of your turn.
I was using flatfooted as an example of the carryover of PF1 thinking. There being flatfooted prevented somebody w/o Combat Reflexes from getting an AoO before acting. That's the closest approximation to a Reaction in PF1, and I've seen this in the forums used as reasoning to deny Reactions in PF2 (even if not in this thread).
It's that thinking that's led to such experiences as Nefreet's. Even after learning creatures aren't flatfooted by default, people think creatures aren't ready to React. Yet they are because there is no rule stating they aren't.So IMO not a completely different question given the roots of the issue.
Without that precedent, I don't think we'd be having issues in PF2.
While there is a phrasing of gaining Reactions at the beginning of one's turn, I see it more as refreshing/regaining one's Reaction(s). I don't see why somebody would start combat w/ their Reaction(s) pre-spent (not that I would object to such a rule, it's just there is no such rule). Which is to say, without a rule taking away one's Reactions or saying they haven't been activated yet, the default would be that creature's function normally, which includes having a Reaction to use.
If creatures did not have a Reaction to use then many of the Reactions that occur at or before rolling initiative would need to give them one first. There's no such language, implying they (and everybody else) do have a Reaction to use on those Reactions.
ETA: Double ninjaed. :)
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Our GM is allowing 'before your first turn' reactions according to the selected exploration activity. Usually those who are on active lookout duty (aka Scout) can react normally including AoO, and if anyone is wary enough to use Defend they can at least use Shield Block in addition to gaining the AC benefit. This may be house rule territory but we found it fits the narrative of the respective activity.
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I generally allow PCs first turn reactions for things like the following:
Someone is using the Defend activity
Both sides are having a heated discussion and it devolves into combat without the use of Stealth or Deception
The PCs are ambushing an enemy and the enemies just happened to roll better initiatives.
The reaction is some sort of automaticish ability, like a Sacred Tattoo, or the Tengu's Eat Fortune.
Something matches your Contingency spell trigger.
However, I would NOT allow on the following:
The PCs get ambushed
A social encounter devolves to combat by using Stealth or Deception.
If a single PC decides to start combat while all the others are surprised by their actions.
|
|
| 3 people marked this as a favorite. |
The rules are pretty clear on you gaining your reaction only at the start of your first turn.
This is not true.
The correct answer is, "It's up to the GM".
You "regain" your reactions at the start of each turn, which some people erroneously point to as meaning you don't have a reaction until your first turn comes around.
The two are not the same.
|
|
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
You conveniently left out the very next sentence there.The rules are pretty clear on you gaining your reaction only at the start of your first turn.This is not true.
The correct answer is, "It's up to the GM".
You "regain" your reactions at the start of each turn, which some people erroneously point to as meaning you don't have a reaction until your first turn comes around.
The two are not the same.
I don't know where you learned English writing and paragraph structure, but sentence placement matters. While that sentence is "the very next", it's also the opening sentence of a completely separate and unrelated paragraph, and the sentences that follow that support it.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
You conveniently left out the very next sentence there.
The rules say:
The GM determines whether you can use reactions before your first turn begins, depending on the situation in which the encounter happens.
Once your first turn begins, you gain your actions and reaction.So, if the GM doesn't give you your reaction before your first turn, you have none.
Yeaaaah, that's not how that works. The second statement in no way says that the default is you don't gain reactions until the start of your first turn. It's additional rules that supplement the previous rule and in no way contradict it.
The rule is that the GM determines. Not that the GM may override the default and give you one.
Then, separately and in another paragraph, it mentions that on your first turn you gain your actions and reaction. This means that, regardless of what the GM determined previously, you automatically gain your reaction at the start of your first turn rather than some other trigger, such as the end of the first round.
Now, personally I default to my players not getting a reaction before the start of their first turn unless they were expecting combat, but RAW is very clearly "GM decides", not "GM can choose to give you one, but otherwise you don't."
Either way the ultimate choice ends with the GM, though, so it's not like it really makes a difference mechanically.
There is a difference between:
a) The rules don't say whether you do or do not gain a particular feature, except "it's up to the GM".
b) The rules say you don't gain a particular feature, except "it's up to the GM".
Okay, but counter point: it doesn't say "you don't gain your reaction until the start of your first turn." It says "Once your first turn begins, you gain your actions and reaction." Those are very different statements, and the latter in no way rules out the possibility of you already having your reaction at that point.
The ONLY rule that mentions reactions BEFORE the start of your first turn is the one that gives that choice to the GM.