Poison and morality


Pathfinder Second Edition General Discussion

301 to 316 of 316 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | next > last >>

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
CrystalSeas wrote:
Malk_Content wrote:
think they are
What divination tool did you use to look inside people's brains?

None needed. Normally people offering advice (even poor advice) are doing so because they believe the advice to be good. I'd rather assume people are giving bad advice because they think it is good advice, rather than giving bad advice because they are trolls.


PossibleCabbage wrote:
I feel like this might just be an inherent issue with the alchemist- since the toxicologist and the mutagenist have a significant amount of their utility tied up in "other people in the party are willing to accept your help."

I agree with this, that the alchemist has a specific issue with this: other gifts are much less dubious and more universally useful and wanted.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
The Raven Black wrote:

Can you cast Light so that I can see? No

Can you provide me with flanking? No

Can you wait for me to cast a buff spell? No

Can you tell us what the ancient text says? No

Works wonders for cooperation.

As Zapp said, better play a character who does not depend on others. But then, why play a TTRPG?

Sounds to me like PFS is more of a "do everything yourself and tell everyone to suck it if they want anything from you, and if they try to press it they're the bad guy and not you" game than a "cooperative roleplaying game that everyone is treated as an equal in."

I mean, that's fine if that was really how Pathfinder (or PFS in particular) was meant to be played. I suspect it's not, for obvious reasons. As such, I find the entitlement of not having to tell or explain anything more toxic and harmful to the gaming environment than the entitlement of wanting an explanation from a response, especially in a case of apparent confusion behind the reasoning of the response.

Grand Lodge

4 people marked this as a favorite.
dirtypool wrote:
"Hey do want a Kit Kat?"

That’s not what is being suggested.

Can I poison your sword?
No, thank you
Can I ask why not?
No.
Okay

There is absolutely no rudeness nor entitlement by either party and that’s a calm, polite conversation.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook Subscriber
Darksol the Painbringer wrote:
Sounds to me like PFS is more of a "do everything yourself and tell everyone to suck it if they want anything from you, and if they try to press it they're the bad guy and not you" game than a "cooperative roleplaying game that everyone is treated as an equal in."

PFS is a lot of things, some contradictory to others. I recommend judging it based on your experience, not forum arguments.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
TriOmegaZero wrote:
Darksol the Painbringer wrote:
Sounds to me like PFS is more of a "do everything yourself and tell everyone to suck it if they want anything from you, and if they try to press it they're the bad guy and not you" game than a "cooperative roleplaying game that everyone is treated as an equal in."
PFS is a lot of things, some contradictory to others. I recommend judging it based on your experience, not forum arguments.

No.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook Subscriber

But I do.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Rulebook Subscriber
TriOmegaZero wrote:
But I do.

Stop being pushy, he said no.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
TriOmegaZero wrote:
But I do.

The answer remains unchanged and I don't need to tell you jack, Jack.

Grand Lodge

Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook Subscriber
Malk_Content wrote:
TriOmegaZero wrote:
But I do.
Stop being pushy, he said no.

I thought he said I didn’t recommend it. But I do..

Guess I should have recommended using poison.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
TriOmegaZero wrote:
I thought he said I didn’t recommend it. But I do..

The answer still remains unchanged, and I don't have to tell you jack, Jack.

Grand Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure, Rulebook Subscriber

I didn’t ask.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Malk_Content wrote:
TriOmegaZero wrote:
But I do.
Stop being pushy, he said no.

Explaining your own feelings and behavior is not being pushy.

Expecting other people to explain their feelings and behavior is being pushy.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
CrystalSeas wrote:
Malk_Content wrote:
TriOmegaZero wrote:
But I do.
Stop being pushy, he said no.

Repeating yourself is not being pushy.

Expecting other people to do something to to satisfy your own feelings is being pushy.

No.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
TriOmegaZero wrote:
I didn’t ask.

No.

Shadow Lodge

Intercourse the penguin!

301 to 316 of 316 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder Second Edition / General Discussion / Poison and morality All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.