PFS#1-13 Devil at the Crossroads


GM Discussion

5/5

I am prepping this at the moment and have a few questions/comments:

1. The sickened effect in the kitchen lacks a value. This seems to be trying to use the old 1E sickened rules. What is the DC to get rid of this (does it use the illusion DC?) and what should the value be? I assume 1.

2. No method is given to disable the kitchen hazard or even to ID it. It isnt likely to be that relevant but still if you are going to list it as a hazard it shuld probably use the hazard rules.

3. The combat with the plotergeist(s) has potential TPK written all over it. Means of overcoming invisibility are harder to come by in 2E and you get one round of visibility before it is pelting you to death from invisibility as only the frigten ability makes them visible.

4. It is good to see the issue of large groups of low level players being addressed in the scaling but this really deserves highlighting. If I calculate my group is high tier I may not even look at the low tier encounter.

5. Quite a lot of the treasure in this scenario requires you to actually rob the trading post. This includes quite literally stealing a dead mans boots. I can imagine a number of characters having a bit of an issue with this.

Dark Archive 3/5 Venture-Captain, Colorado—Denver aka masterslate

#1 -- I think it might mean they're sicked 1 for 1 hour, or they can just sit there are try to wretch for a few rolls til it goes away... *shrug*

#2:

Quote:
Linneus’s malevolent will haunts the kitchen and continues to cause any plate or piece of cutlery that a creature interacts with to attempt to injure that creature until the PCs either destroy or contain the artifact

#3 -- This makes use of the new rules for visibility conditions:

Quote:
While invisible, you can’t be seen. You’re undetected to everyone. Creatures can Seek to attempt to detect you; if a creature succeeds at its Perception check against your Stealth DC, you become hidden to that creature until you Sneak to become undetected again. If you become invisible while someone can already see you, you start out hidden to the observer (instead of undetected) until you successfully Sneak. You can’t become observed while invisible except via special abilities or magic.

#4 I think that is in error, 16-18 should be high tier, no exceptions as far as I know.

#5 They're not robbing, they're "recovering" items :)

I'll have my GM Cheat Sheet up on http://www.pfsprep.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewforum.php?541 soon


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
Zach Armstrong wrote:
#4 I think that is in error, 16-18 should be high tier, no exceptions as far as I know.

Nope, it wasn't communicated very well (nor was the guide adjusted in time), but they're looking into splitting up 16-18 into two seperate groups: small parties (of higher-level PCs) play high subtier, while large parties (of lower-level PCs) play low subtier with the same number of CP.

This appears to be the first try and, yes, it's hidden too well and might lead to GMs unaware of the issue to run high subtier for a group that should have played low subtier.

https://paizo.com/threads/rzs42xg7?What-is-the-level-range-of-play-for-PFS2 #21

The Concordance 4/5 5/5

2 people marked this as a favorite.
andreww wrote:


5. Quite a lot of the treasure in this scenario requires you to actually rob the trading post. This includes quite literally stealing a dead mans boots. I can imagine a number of characters having a bit of an issue with this.

Yeah, this thing bugged me too. Not to mention that looting small items while exploring the haunted murder house really breaks atmosphere of horror and paranoia this scenario is trying to create.

Luckily, as per Organised Play Guide, GM can adjust Treasure Bundles layout depending on player actions. So, if your party does not want to take those boots or rob a kitchen, award them elsewhere.

I rolled secret checks for each character exploring rooms with treasure to make sure they would`ve found it. Then, in the end, the survivors found hidden chest filled with old chelish gold coins in the ruins of trading post - containing all those missed Treasure Bundles.

5/5

OK, I ran this today. We started with six players (2 level 3, 4 level 4, 16CP). This does create an oddity between encounters. As per the Guide this would be high tier however, as per the CP notes, low tier for some encounters.

The issue is that there is only scaling for 16-18CP on some of the encounters. Are we supposed to run the low tier encounter where there is specific low tier scaling for 16CP and switch to high tier where there is no specific scaling?

This did not seem right so I ran low tier for the whole thing. We actually had a player drop out after the first encounter so it became 13CP which resolved the issue but if we are going to using specific 16-18CP scaling it should probably be present for all encounters or at least clear it is suposed to be for all of them.

Overall the scenario for fine until the final encounter which went the full duration. The barbarian crit failing against Paranoia did create a degree of hilarity. His dice also only woke up once he was beating on the other players.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

The guide just isn't up-to-date on the issue, I'm quite sure 16CP with 5+ players is supposed to be low subtier in general (for these newer adventures, i.e. 1-12 and 1-13), not just for those encounters that specifically list it in the scaling sidebars. Hopefully, future adventures make this more clear from the start, and the guide will eventually get some more updates.

5/5 Venture-Agent, California—San Francisco Bay Area North & East aka Pirate Rob

andreww wrote:

OK, I ran this today. We started with six players (2 level 3, 4 level 4, 16CP). This does create an oddity between encounters. As per the Guide this would be high tier however, as per the CP notes, low tier for some encounters.

The issue is that there is only scaling for 16-18CP on some of the encounters. Are we supposed to run the low tier encounter where there is specific low tier scaling for 16CP and switch to high tier where there is no specific scaling?

Isn't that 32 points?


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

It's a Tier 3-6 adventure, so level 3 is the lowest possible level, "worth" 2 CP and level 4 the second-lowest, "worth" 3 CP each.

5/5 Venture-Agent, California—San Francisco Bay Area North & East aka Pirate Rob

Thanks, missed the higher tier and things weren't making any sense.

3/5 5/5

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber
Zach Armstrong wrote:


#3 -- This makes use of the new rules for visibility conditions:

Quote:
While invisible, you can’t be seen. You’re undetected to everyone. Creatures can Seek to attempt to detect you; if a creature succeeds at its Perception check against your Stealth DC, you become hidden to that creature until you Sneak to become undetected again. If you become invisible while someone can already see you, you start out hidden to the observer (instead of undetected) until you successfully Sneak. You can’t become observed while invisible except via special abilities or magic.

This of course assumes your GM allows the use of Seek at all. Our GM ruled that since the Poltergeist was incorporeal it didn't make any sound when moving and therefore Seek was useless. The only way we could find it was to hit it by randomly striking squares and hoping to get lucky.

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Companion, Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber
Halgur wrote:
Zach Armstrong wrote:


#3 -- This makes use of the new rules for visibility conditions:

Quote:
While invisible, you can’t be seen. You’re undetected to everyone. Creatures can Seek to attempt to detect you; if a creature succeeds at its Perception check against your Stealth DC, you become hidden to that creature until you Sneak to become undetected again. If you become invisible while someone can already see you, you start out hidden to the observer (instead of undetected) until you successfully Sneak. You can’t become observed while invisible except via special abilities or magic.
This of course assumes your GM allows the use of Seek at all. Our GM ruled that since the Poltergeist was incorporeal it didn't make any sound when moving and therefore Seek was useless. The only way we could find it was to hit it by randomly striking squares and hoping to get lucky.

There's nothing in the Incorporeal Trait that says it is silent nor does it disallow Seek/ Perception options.

It being sneakier is already factored into its Stealth score.

1/5 5/55/5

Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber

Not allowing seek at all is just a completely wrong ruling. Running this scenario with a 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5 party, the paired poltergeist already brought things to the point of being a real TPK risk, by bringing the only character with See Invisibility to a dying condition more than once, without focusing on him. Instead, the encounter did draw out long enough to make the scenaro go WELL over the allotted time, even trying to summarize and hustle through a lot of exploration afterwards to make up lost time.

Making targeting a completely random chance, if characters without appropriate magic are not present or not conscious is an inexcusably bad call.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Battles Case Subscriber; Pathfinder Maps, Pawns Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Starfinder Superscriber

I believe that Halgur's GM might have been remembering a rule from the Universal Monster Rules of 1st Edition, which states:

1st Edition Bestiary, p. 301, "Incorporeal (Ex)" wrote:
An incorporeal creature moves silently and cannot be heard with Perception checks if it doesn’t wish to be.

However, this rule does not exist in 2nd Edition - as Rysky pointed out, this language is not present for the Incorporeal trait in 2E (2nd Edition Bestiary p.346).

1/5 5/55/5

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber

Sure, we all make rules mistakes, especially with an edition move. I am ABSOLUTELY no exception.

I'm just saying that something with effects like "you can't even attempt to find the location of the thing killing you" is a case where the effects of the rule would be so extreme that double checking your recollection of the rule is not optional.

Community / Forums / Organized Play / GM Discussion / PFS#1-13 Devil at the Crossroads All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in GM Discussion