Firebrands and Eagle Knights


Lost Omens Campaign Setting General Discussion


The Firebrands and Eagle Knights seem very similar - both of them are organisations devoted to fighting against evil, with ideals of freedom and equality, with strong ties to former Chelish colonies. Considering this, what is the difference between the two organisations? When Vidria was reaching out to other former Chelish colonies with similar values to form the Firebrands, why didn't they contact the Eagle Knights as well as the Silver Ravens? Why aren't the Eagle Knights listed among the allies of the Firebrands? And how does one determine whether to make a character an Eagle Knight or a Firebrand?


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Well, the Eagle Knights are a state-funded military organization in Andoran. The Firebrands are a lot less official, in that whatever materiel aid they receive from the governments of Ravounel or Vidrian has to be on the "plausible deniability" level.

There's a significant difference in how the relevant countries relate to Cheliax. Ravounel and Vidrian are protected from Chellish invasion via contractual shenanigans and remoteness, but are small and comparatively weak as new countries without stable governments and would get rolled if a war actually did break out. Andoran has been preparing to go to war with Cheliax for the last hundred plus years.

So Andoran probably does have contact via the Twilight Talons with high ranking Firebrands, as they share similar goals, but officially it's not in either's best interest to officially unite. For one thing, if Cheliax and Andoran do go to war, Ravounel is treaty-bound to come to the aid of Cheliax- something neither Eagle Knights nor Firebrands want.

In terms of "which to make your character" the big difference is that Eagle Knights are Andoran patriots, whereas Firebrands are freedom fighters and rabblerousers from everywhere else.


PossibleCabbage wrote:

Well, the Eagle Knights are a state-funded military organization in Andoran. The Firebrands are a lot less official, in that whatever materiel aid they receive from the governments of Ravounel or Vidrian has to be on the "plausible deniability" level.

There's a significant difference in how the relevant countries relate to Cheliax. Ravounel and Vidrian are protected from Chellish invasion via contractual shenanigans and remoteness, but are small and comparatively weak as new countries without stable governments and would get rolled if a war actually did break out. Andoran has been preparing to go to war with Cheliax for the last hundred plus years.

So Andoran probably does have contact via the Twilight Talons with high ranking Firebrands, as they share similar goals, but officially it's not in either's best interest to officially unite. For one thing, if Cheliax and Andoran do go to war, Ravounel is treaty-bound to come to the aid of Cheliax- something neither Eagle Knights nor Firebrands want.

In terms of "which to make your character" the big difference is that Eagle Knights are Andoran patriots, whereas Firebrands are freedom fighters and rabblerousers from everywhere else.

Thank you for your explanation.

Shadow Lodge

PossibleCabbage wrote:
In terms of "which to make your character" the big difference is that Eagle Knights are Andoran patriots, whereas Firebrands are freedom fighters and rabblerousers from everywhere else.

To expand on this point, the Firebrands are an international association with affiliates in many countries. The SRs of Ravounel and whatever organization the revolutionaries in Vidrian formed before they took power (it's not named, for some reason - maybe they are the original "Firebrands" and the whole association took their name?) are predominant for obvious reasons, but there should be both self-proclaimed and more-or-less official sections in any number of countries. The Children of Westcrown in Cheliax (assuming any survived the reconquest of the city at the end of Hell's Vengeance), the Heralds of Summer's Return in Irrisen, and the Scarlet Rose Gray Maidens might well have affiliated themselves with the Firebrands by 4720. So could, and this is important, people in Andoran.

Something that always bugged me about Andoran was that it was presented as a political near-monolith. Sure, there are some ineffectual schemers trying to restore the old order, and there's the Lumber Consortium with its own interests, but a democratic republic really should have political parties. And speaking of the Lumber Consortium, it should really be generating organized political discontent among its laborers and captive market/company towns. There should be some political defense at home of imperialist expansion, and political expression of anti-imperialism, especially given that colonial competition with Cheliax (and possibly a resurgent Taldor) is likely to lead to war. The Eagle Knights are committed to the defense of the status quo at home and imperialism abroad. A Firebrand might be just the ticket for one of Andoran's discontents.


I feel like a big cause of Andoran unity is that they have big nasty Cheliax next door ready to destroy the Andoran way of life and they are literally in league with the devil. Cheliax is the best "unite around opposing those guys" you could ever hope for in terms of creating artificial national unity- you don't even have to paint them as the baddies, since they come out and say it like it's a badge of honor.

But yeah, they definitely could drill down on some of the subtler schisms lurking in Andoran. It always seemed under-explored in the source material to date.

But I did assume that Andoran had political parties, it's just that no one at Paizo was interested in naming them or fleshing out what they were about. Perhaps to represent that "everyone outside of Andoran finds Andoran politics incomprehensible" but more likely because they had other things going on.

Shadow Lodge

PossibleCabbage wrote:
I feel like a big cause of Andoran unity is that they have big nasty Cheliax next door ready to destroy the Andoran way of life and they are literally in league with the devil. Cheliax is the best "unite around opposing those guys" you could ever hope for in terms of creating artificial national unity- you don't even have to paint them as the baddies, since they come out and say it like it's a badge of honor.

To which an Andoren Firebrand might reasonably respond that Cheliax is no monolith; it was just rocked by revolution, and today hosts at least two national-scale subversive and popular (that is, based in the popular classes) organizations that have proved impossible to root out despite the most fierce repression, whose struggle is ongoing. That militarism and war fever are self-fulfilling prophecies, and that just like the Andoren government profits from a rally-round-the-flag effect, so too does the Chelish government, and that artificial patriotism may be one of the only things keeping it alive. That for many Andorens just as for the Chelish masses, the main enemy is at home.

None of these are sentiments that an Eagle Knight, whose position demands that they uphold domestic order and Andoran's imperialist foreign policy which creates endless flash points with its rivals for world power, could ever express. And that is both 1) an element that helps shake up Andoran from what is frankly both a boring and unbelievable status quo, and 2) is a big part of the answer to the OP's question.

Also probably worth noting is that while Andoran's Supreme Elect in 1E was a worker (specifically a sailor), its current Supreme Elect was an Eagle Knight, specifically a Steel Falcon.

(FWIW, I think of Andoran's hegemonic political party as the "Populists," based on the naming of the People's Revolt.)


Yeah, there absolutely is a place for Firebrands to work in Andoran whose agenda would run contrary to the goals of the Andoran government (and hence the Eagle Knights). There would just probably be a reasonable bit of dissension among the Firebrands as to whether this is a valuable use of time and resources considering all significantly worse places they could probably do more good in.

There's probably a good "do not let perfect be the enemy of good" versus "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" story to be told here about Firebrands who are struggling with these questions.

Shadow Lodge

PossibleCabbage wrote:
Yeah, there absolutely is a place for Firebrands to work in Andoran whose agenda would run contrary to the goals of the Andoran government (and hence the Eagle Knights). There would just probably be a reasonable bit of dissension among the Firebrands as to whether this is a valuable use of time and resources considering all significantly worse places they could probably do more good in.

It's not really up to the center in Kintargo (presumably this is the relevant center; Anthusis is far away) whether local groups pop up or not, and what their activities are. Especially since they don't disavow groups that claim affiliation. What is up to them, at most, is whether to support these groups with their own resources and personnel. And they might well decide not to. The center has its own state backers to advance the interests of, and it could well prioritize friendly relations with the Andoren government over its own affiliates a la the way the Comintern prioritized relations with the KMT over its own affiliate in China.

But consider the position of a local Firebrand-affiliated group in Andoran. The center has no authority or ability to stamp them out or curtail their activities, whatever they decide those to be. And as an affiliated group they can work to change the politics of the center, albeit from a position of relative weakness in the overall association.


PossibleCabbage wrote:

For one thing, if Cheliax and Andoran do go to war, Ravounel is treaty-bound to come to the aid of Cheliax- something neither Eagle Knights nor Firebrands want.

This is not necessarily true, we don't know what detail is peace agreement. It was possible that some countries were exempt, meaning Cheliax would need to fight them alone. In fact I think Andoran and Taldor was used as examples of such exceptions.

Shadow Lodge

Erk Ander wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:

For one thing, if Cheliax and Andoran do go to war, Ravounel is treaty-bound to come to the aid of Cheliax- something neither Eagle Knights nor Firebrands want.

This is not necessarily true, we don't know what detail is peace agreement. It was possible that some countries were exempt, meaning Cheliax would need to fight them alone. In fact I think Andoran and Taldor was used as examples of such exceptions.

Nope. Most Ravounel can get is a time limit when they can't be called to war. Eventually, if the war goes on long enough, they will be a co-belligerent with Cheliax.


zimmerwald1915 wrote:
Erk Ander wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:

For one thing, if Cheliax and Andoran do go to war, Ravounel is treaty-bound to come to the aid of Cheliax- something neither Eagle Knights nor Firebrands want.

This is not necessarily true, we don't know what detail is peace agreement. It was possible that some countries were exempt, meaning Cheliax would need to fight them alone. In fact I think Andoran and Taldor was used as examples of such exceptions.
Nope. Most Ravounel can get is a time limit when they can't be called to war. Eventually, if the war goes on long enough, they will be a co-belligerent with Cheliax.

You can also negotiate "Ravounel can withdraw from the conflict after a certain amount of time elapses" but even though Cheliax understands that Ravounel is not going to be an enthusiastic, or especially helpful ally in event of war, they also understand that it is very much not in Ravounel's best interest to violate their treaty with Cheliax.

Shadow Lodge

PossibleCabbage wrote:
zimmerwald1915 wrote:
Erk Ander wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:

For one thing, if Cheliax and Andoran do go to war, Ravounel is treaty-bound to come to the aid of Cheliax- something neither Eagle Knights nor Firebrands want.

This is not necessarily true, we don't know what detail is peace agreement. It was possible that some countries were exempt, meaning Cheliax would need to fight them alone. In fact I think Andoran and Taldor was used as examples of such exceptions.
Nope. Most Ravounel can get is a time limit when they can't be called to war. Eventually, if the war goes on long enough, they will be a co-belligerent with Cheliax.
You can also negotiate "Ravounel can withdraw from the conflict after a certain amount of time elapses" but even though Cheliax understands that Ravounel is not going to be an enthusiastic, or especially helpful ally in event of war, they also understand that it is very much not in Ravounel's best interest to violate their treaty with Cheliax.

There is, of course a practical question here. Ravounel has a low population, is ocean-facing, and is highly likely to leak sensitive material with which it is entrusted. Given all that, what can Cheliax realistically ask of them in a war with Andoran and get more than they lose? Ground troops are right out. They would be few in number, unreliable, and difficult to transport. Ravounel's best use might be for commerce and colony raiding, but that just risks strengthening Ravounel itself. Captured prizes would join the Ravounel Navy or merchant marine, and captured colonies would be occupied by Ravounel. This can be ameliorated somewhat by requiring the Ravounel Navy to sortie only as part of a combined Chelish-Ravounel fleet, but commerce raiders operate alone and are hard to police. Maybe require a Chelish political officer on any commerce raider?


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
zimmerwald1915 wrote:
There is, of course a practical question here. Ravounel has a low population, is ocean-facing, and is highly likely to leak sensitive material with which it is entrusted. Given all that, what can Cheliax realistically ask of them in a war with Andoran and get more than they lose? Ground troops are right out. They would be few in number, unreliable, and difficult to transport. Ravounel's best use might be for commerce and colony raiding, but that just risks strengthening Ravounel itself. Captured prizes would join the Ravounel Navy or merchant marine, and captured colonies would be occupied by Ravounel. This can be ameliorated somewhat by requiring the Ravounel Navy to sortie only as part of a combined Chelish-Ravounel fleet, but commerce raiders operate alone and are hard to police. Maybe require a Chelish political officer on any commerce raider?

Or just as many ground troops as they can argue for via the terms of the treaty out of spite. Efficient or not, Ravounel is the one bearing the expense.

The best case scenario for Ravounel is actually Only land troops no navy, with exemptions in the alliance for Andoran and/or Taldor (or whoever the Silver Ravens of a particular world thought to negotiate for exclusion) with a X month delay before hostilities begin and a pull out clause of Y months.

And the nonaggression pact can twist it up even more.

Unfortunately, we don't know what the default Oakrib Accord actually is going forward, just that it has to be there because the AP was considered successfully completed.

Shadow Lodge

Kasoh wrote:
Or just as many ground troops as they can argue for via the terms of the treaty out of spite. Efficient or not, Ravounel is the one bearing the expense.

The trouble with ground troops, even if Ravounel can be made to pay for and arrange their supply, is that they are highly likely to fraternize with or desert to the enemy if they get to the front, or surrender at the drop of a hat and allow themselves to be taken prisoner. Either way you lose valuable intelligence and may lose a fighting unit. To stop that, you'd need to invest so much effort into countermeasures (devil MPs and such) that you might as well just form another unit with the men and resources you'd use keeping the Ravounels in line and save yourself the trouble.

Quote:

The best case scenario for Ravounel is actually Only land troops no navy, with exemptions in the alliance for Andoran and/or Taldor (or whoever the Silver Ravens of a particular world thought to negotiate for exclusion) with a X month delay before hostilities begin and a pull out clause of Y months.

And the nonaggression pact can twist it up even more.

Unfortunately, we don't know what the default Oakrib Accord actually is going forward, just that it has to be there because the AP was considered successfully completed.

There is no non-aggression pact with third powers in the Oakrib Accord. It would be such a blatant shot across the bow that Cheliax would abandon the negotiations right there. And the Oakrib Accord, forming part of the basic law of Ravounel, surely supercedes any other agreement (if it didn't, Ravounel could do things like sell off its entire annual salt production to a third party and avoid paying the remittances). But yes, the best solution for Ravounel is a contribution of ground troops and nothing more, precisely for the reasons I identified; Ravounel contributing ground troops helps Cheliax's enemies more than Cheliax. Which is surely why Cheliax will demand, and get, because it is the stronger party with more leverage, something else.


If Ravounel really does get the ball rolling it does seem more likely they'd end up as a naval power than anything else. Since they're primarily a mercantile state and they have pretty direct access to a lot of presumably friendly ports on the northern part of the Arcadian Ocean (including notably Azir, Magnimar, and emerging markets in New Thassilon.)

Their terrestrial borders are protected by mountains, a treaty, and Nidalese apathy. So it seems that they'd commit more resources to building a navy (or at least a merchant marine which would double as one in a pinch) than to a ground based military.

Shadow Lodge

PossibleCabbage wrote:
If Ravounel really does get the ball rolling it does seem more likely they'd end up as a naval power than anything else.

I mean, geopolitically Ravounel is basically Portugal. Geographically too - the North Plains are volcanically active. Here's hoping that Xin's eruption in Magnimar was the equivalent of the Lisbon earthquake, and that the Big One isn't coming for Kintargo O.o

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Companion, Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber
zimmerwald1915 wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:
If Ravounel really does get the ball rolling it does seem more likely they'd end up as a naval power than anything else.
I mean, geopolitically Ravounel is basically Portugal. Geographically too - the North Plains are volcanically active. Here's hoping that Xin's eruption in Magnimar was the equivalent of the Lisbon earthquake, and that the Big One isn't coming for Kintargo O.o

Seeing as how Golarion isn't Earth that's a good bet.

Shadow Lodge

Rysky wrote:
zimmerwald1915 wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:
If Ravounel really does get the ball rolling it does seem more likely they'd end up as a naval power than anything else.
I mean, geopolitically Ravounel is basically Portugal. Geographically too - the North Plains are volcanically active. Here's hoping that Xin's eruption in Magnimar was the equivalent of the Lisbon earthquake, and that the Big One isn't coming for Kintargo O.o
Seeing as how Golarion isn't Earth that's a good bet.

Close enough. It's got dead-on analogues for each of Earth's continents and oceans - with the addition of a northern polar continent and an ocean dividing central from east "Asia." But neither of those is relevant to Ravounel's geography.

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Adventure, Adventure Path, Companion, Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber
zimmerwald1915 wrote:
Rysky wrote:
zimmerwald1915 wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:
If Ravounel really does get the ball rolling it does seem more likely they'd end up as a naval power than anything else.
I mean, geopolitically Ravounel is basically Portugal. Geographically too - the North Plains are volcanically active. Here's hoping that Xin's eruption in Magnimar was the equivalent of the Lisbon earthquake, and that the Big One isn't coming for Kintargo O.o
Seeing as how Golarion isn't Earth that's a good bet.
Close enough. It's got dead-on analogues for each of Earth's continents and oceans - with the addition of a northern polar continent and an ocean dividing central from east "Asia." But neither of those is relevant to Ravounel's geography.

Especially the "Ravounel is not on Earth" part.


Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
zimmerwald1915 wrote:
There is no non-aggression pact with third powers in the Oakrib Accord. It would be such a blatant shot across the bow that Cheliax would abandon the negotiations right there. And the Oakrib Accord, forming part of the basic law of Ravounel, surely supercedes any other agreement (if it didn't, Ravounel could do things like sell off its entire annual salt production to a third party and avoid paying the remittances). But yes, the best solution for Ravounel is a contribution of ground troops and nothing more, precisely for the reasons I identified; Ravounel contributing ground troops helps Cheliax's enemies more than Cheliax. Which is surely why Cheliax will demand, and get, because it is the stronger party with more...

Part of the concessions of the Nonagression pact is that Ravounel can sell arms and magic to outside parties, and even allow open borders to foreign armies. I don't have my book with me, but I think that's the gist. The terms of it are actually ridiculous considering how relatively low the DCs are for the PC's level.

Now, it might not be how these sort of things work historically, but I imagine that Cheliax would request as many troops as they could, then put them in the front and push Ravounelians through the meat grinder just to be jerks about it. I see the military alliance as a form of Ravounel's human sacrifice.

It depends a lot on how antagonistic you imagine the two nations to be. Pretty much all of Cheliax relies on every military commander stationed near Ravounel to not pull a "Fangwood Keep." So, Cheliax has some incentive to play nice and Ravounel is surrounded by danger, so being able to play nice with Cheliax could be a politically relevant goal.

Shadow Lodge

Kasoh wrote:
Part of the concessions of the Nonagression pact is that Ravounel can sell arms and magic to outside parties, and even allow open borders to foreign armies. I don't have my book with me, but I think that's the gist. The terms of it are actually ridiculous considering how relatively low the DCs are for the PC's level.

These are basic aspects of sovereignty, and the default is that Ravounel does not get them. Writing a nonaggression pact into the treaty would be a bridge yet farther.

Quote:
Now, it might not be how these sort of things work historically, but I imagine that Cheliax would request as many troops as they could, then put them in the front and push Ravounelians through the meat grinder just to be jerks about it. I see the military alliance as a form of Ravounel's human sacrifice.

Trouble is, again, they'd have to force the Ravounels on the ground to play along with that plan. Without a line of Chelish NKVD at their back and among their ranks, they'd just desert or surrender. And if you have NKVD to spare, you have the makings of a good fighting unit that should be used for that purpose rather than keeping an unreliable unit in line for the sake of spite.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
zimmerwald1915 wrote:
Erk Ander wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:

For one thing, if Cheliax and Andoran do go to war, Ravounel is treaty-bound to come to the aid of Cheliax- something neither Eagle Knights nor Firebrands want.

This is not necessarily true, we don't know what detail is peace agreement. It was possible that some countries were exempt, meaning Cheliax would need to fight them alone. In fact I think Andoran and Taldor was used as examples of such exceptions.
Nope. Most Ravounel can get is a time limit when they can't be called to war. Eventually, if the war goes on long enough, they will be a co-belligerent with Cheliax.

I am simply going to the quote the part from the Adventure path and the arguement with that

"Nereza agrees to place limits on the nations against
which Ravounel will assist Cheliax. For example, the
PCs may ask for an exemption on warring against
Andoran or Taldor."

Do you see now ? Depending on the success of the negotiations there might be exceptions. Just like I said. We don't know how well it went only that they succeded to negotiate. To what extent is unknown.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Erk Ander wrote:
zimmerwald1915 wrote:
Erk Ander wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:

For one thing, if Cheliax and Andoran do go to war, Ravounel is treaty-bound to come to the aid of Cheliax- something neither Eagle Knights nor Firebrands want.

This is not necessarily true, we don't know what detail is peace agreement. It was possible that some countries were exempt, meaning Cheliax would need to fight them alone. In fact I think Andoran and Taldor was used as examples of such exceptions.
Nope. Most Ravounel can get is a time limit when they can't be called to war. Eventually, if the war goes on long enough, they will be a co-belligerent with Cheliax.

I am simply going to the quote the part from the Adventure path and the arguement with that

"Nereza agrees to place limits on the nations against
which Ravounel will assist Cheliax. For example, the
PCs may ask for an exemption on warring against
Andoran or Taldor."

Do you see now ? Depending on the success of the negotiations there might be exceptions. Just like I said. We don't know how well it went only that they succeded to negotiate. To what extent is unknown.

Ah, you're new to Zimmerwald's "Golarion is Earth with changed names and some irrelevant fantasy stuff sprinkled on the top".


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Card Game Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber
Gorbacz wrote:
Ah, you're new to Zimmerwald's "Golarion is Earth with changed names and some irrelevant fantasy stuff sprinkled on the top".

If you're familiar with history, using the activities and behaviors of historical governments and industries can provide a great deal of guidance on what might happen in another similar setting without having to spend a lot of time making stuff up or deciding something off the cuff that ends up having repercussions you have to clean up later. (This depends on how simulationist your fantasy geo-politics goes.)

I find Zimmerwald's extrapolation useful. Some of it is usable in my games, some of it isn't but its almost always entertaining.

Shadow Lodge

Erk Ander wrote:
zimmerwald1915 wrote:
Erk Ander wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:

For one thing, if Cheliax and Andoran do go to war, Ravounel is treaty-bound to come to the aid of Cheliax- something neither Eagle Knights nor Firebrands want.

This is not necessarily true, we don't know what detail is peace agreement. It was possible that some countries were exempt, meaning Cheliax would need to fight them alone. In fact I think Andoran and Taldor was used as examples of such exceptions.
Nope. Most Ravounel can get is a time limit when they can't be called to war. Eventually, if the war goes on long enough, they will be a co-belligerent with Cheliax.

I am simply going to the quote the part from the Adventure path and the arguement with that

"Nereza agrees to place limits on the nations against
which Ravounel will assist Cheliax. For example, the
PCs may ask for an exemption on warring against
Andoran or Taldor."

Do you see now ? Depending on the success of the negotiations there might be exceptions. Just like I said. We don't know how well it went only that they succeded to negotiate. To what extent is unknown.

Thanks for the correction. Still a boneheaded move on Cheliax's part, but there it is.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I think a significant theme in the Hell's [Foo] Adventure Path duology is that Cheliax is making significant mistakes because they have two crises pop up simultaneously and only really have the resources/political capital to address one of them.

They sensibly chose Westcrown over Kintargo.

Ravounel is just tremendously lucky because they had the Glorious Reclamation running interference during their secession (not to mention that Barzillai was a loon the other Thrunes didn't like much), and shortly thereafter the Whispering Tyrant woke up putting an end to pretty much all military adventurism by the inner sea powers, who find themselves having to be nominal allies until the Lich gets put back in the box.

Cheliax probably benefits from the "rally around the flag to oppose the armies of the dead" too, come to think of it.

Shadow Lodge

PossibleCabbage wrote:
Cheliax probably benefits from the "rally around the flag to oppose the armies of the dead" too, come to think of it.

"The toilers in Egorian's dark, satanic mills, and the slaves in the cotton or jute plantation that feed them, have more in common with a vampiric or wightish thrall, or the minion of a necromancer, than with the Paraduke over their heads or his master, Mammon. And must someday make common cause against all masters."


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
zimmerwald1915 wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:
Cheliax probably benefits from the "rally around the flag to oppose the armies of the dead" too, come to think of it.
"The toilers in Egorian's dark, satanic mills, and the slaves in the cotton or jute plantation that feed them, have more in common with a vampiric or wightish thrall, or the minion of a necromancer, than with the Paraduke over their heads or his master, Mammon. And must someday make common cause against all masters."

That could make for an interesting story. Though I think that'd be a pretty hard sell to convince people of that. You'd probably have better luck making them hate the idea of mindless undead taking their jobs.

Shadow Lodge

Squeakmaan wrote:
zimmerwald1915 wrote:
PossibleCabbage wrote:
Cheliax probably benefits from the "rally around the flag to oppose the armies of the dead" too, come to think of it.
"The toilers in Egorian's dark, satanic mills, and the slaves in the cotton or jute plantation that feed them, have more in common with a vampiric or wightish thrall, or the minion of a necromancer, than with the Paraduke over their heads or his master, Mammon. And must someday make common cause against all masters."
That could make for an interesting story. Though I think that'd be a pretty hard sell to convince people of that. You'd probably have better luck making them hate the idea of mindless undead taking their jobs.

It's a hard enough sell when the undead in this analogy are actual human beings. It's only really ever been successful once. But convincing people to hate the undead (in this analogy) is not only immoral, but counterproductive. Why exclude the thralls of the world from the international brotherhood of labor, and thereby render their masters invulnerable to challenge except from the outside?

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Lost Omens Campaign Setting / General Discussion / Firebrands and Eagle Knights All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.