
FWCain |
Can a PC who is multi-classed, and whose respective classes allow him access to both a companion as well as a familiar, have his companion also be his familiar? (The specific example I'm envisioning is a Ranger/Magus having an owl that is both his companion and his familiar.)
Thanks in advance.
Franklin

VoodistMonk |

Would it honestly change anything to combine the two into a single entity?
It would have the Familiar archetype, and abilities to share spells and speak with its master.
It would also get feats, size adjustment, and the tricks of the Animal Companion.
Obviously you could get into some shenanigans with the Mauler archetype and the size increase from the AC leveling up, but really it's not that big of a deal... you don't want to risk losing both of them at the same time, so your Mauler Owl Fampanion is probably not going to be divebombing touch spells in combat.

Scott Wilhelm |
I don't think it's kosher to have a Familiar that is also a Companion. But you can have 1 of each.
Would it honestly change anything to combine the two into a single entity?
If I were the GM, I'd allow it, but per RAW, I don't think it's allowed.
Obviously you could get into some shenanigans with the Mauler archetype and the size increase from the AC leveling up,
I don't think the Size will result in shennanigans.
the mauler’s size becomes Medium
If you were a Mammoth Rider with a Huge Triceratops Animal Companion that was also your Mauler Familiar, well then in his Battle Form, it shrinks to Size Medium!

VoodistMonk |

The OP mentioned Owls...
Mauler Owl becomes medium at level one...
Animal Companion size adjustment due to level, it becomes large...
Large Mauler Owl Fampanion divebombing touch spells might lead to shenanigans...
I don't really mind, regardless.
Putting BOTH your Familiar AND your AC into combat is a fool's gamble.
But I can see how it would be awesome flavor-wise for a character to combine the two into one entity.

DarkPhoenixx |

Don't think it is supported by rules RAW, but I don't see a problem.
Its HP would be compromised, since its a familiar (but at -3 ranger progression maybe its not that big of a difference). GM will have to adjudicate cases where Companion and Familiar rules clash, but if companion is used as base creature for familiar rules seems like it gonna work.

Mysterious Stranger |

The answer is no.
A familiar is an animal chosen by a spellcaster to aid him in his study of magic. It retains the appearance, Hit Dice, base attack bonus, base save bonuses, skills, and feats of the normal animal it once was, but is now a magical beast for the purpose of effects that depend on its type. Only a normal, unmodified animal may become a familiar. An animal companion cannot also function as a familiar.

blahpers |

It would definitely change things. An animal companion would eventually be a much more reliable means of delivering touch spells, and the familiar's empathic link is a powerful (if underrated) ability that would only get better on a tankier animal companion.
The question is, would it break things? Nah. You're giving up having two companions worth of action economy for those benefits. It's a decent enough house rule if you can figure out how to calculate things like hit points and skills.

zza ni |

for any gm who want to home-brew this (not following the pathfinder rules) there was a prc at 3.5 of combination of druid and arcane caster (Arcane Hierophant) that had an animal companion which also serve as familiar.
hack if the gm allow this then taking the prc might be a good way not to be behind on both druid\ranger\etc and arcane class abilities (casting animals etc)

David knott 242 |

Importing that prestige class from D&D 3.5 and using various 3rd party features are the only methods that I am aware of for combining an animal companion and a familiar into a single creature. I would recommend the Arcane Hierophant prestige class since it is more easily vetted.