Pathfinder Second Edition Demo Adventure: Torment and Legacy Sanctioning


Pathfinder Society

Sovereign Court 4/5 ⦵⦵⦵⦵ Venture-Agent, Georgia—Atlanta aka The Masked Ferret

4 people marked this as a favorite.

Could we please get Pathfinder Second Edition Demo Adventure: Torment and Legacy sanctioned as a quest for Pathfinder Society, please?

Grand Lodge 4/5

I will second that!

Grand Lodge 3/5 Venture-Agent, Australia—QLD—Gold Coast aka DanielB

Thirded

Dark Archive 5/5

Against

This is a perfect opportunity to introduce new players to the mechanics. It runs well as a demo. Adding it for society credit adds needless levels of complexity to a demo.

5/5 Venture-Lieutenant, California—San Diego aka RAdeMorris

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Paul Crotteau wrote:
. . . Adding it for society credit adds needless levels of complexity to a demo.

I disagree, partially. I would say adding Society credit should be seen as an option to add to, not make a requirement of, running the demo.

A sanctioning document doesn't mean that those organizers using this a demo game for their events need to change anything, but would allow those that are seeking to add to their characters' stories options.

Sanctioning should be no more difficult to coordinate than running sanctioned Adventures or Adventure Paths.

Grand Lodge 4/5 Venture-Agent, Colorado—Denver aka roll4initiative

Please do sanction it. It would be nice to get credit for spending the time GMing it.

Scarab Sages 5/5 Venture-Lieutenant, Australia—NSW—Sydney aka sanwah68

Could we please get some indication from the team as to the possibility of this being sanctioned...just to manage expectations.

Grand Lodge 4/5 Venture-Agent, Colorado—Denver aka roll4initiative

Paul Crotteau wrote:

Against

This is a perfect opportunity to introduce new players to the mechanics. It runs well as a demo. Adding it for society credit adds needless levels of complexity to a demo.

Don't print out or distribute any chronicles if they do decide to sanction it. Run for fun!

Dark Archive 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I will run for fun, not credit.

Asking for the development team to sanction every piece of paper that comes across the desk will slow down the process of getting the pieces that NEED sanctioning (Plaguestone, Age of Ashes, Lost Omens) getting pushed further back. Not to mention the Roleplay Guild Guide.

I would prefer to have those adventures and content sanctioned first.

Scarab Sages 5/5 Venture-Lieutenant, Australia—NSW—Sydney aka sanwah68

1 person marked this as a favorite.

It has been stated in the Product thread that this will not be sanctioned for PFS.

Sovereign Court 4/5 ⦵⦵⦵⦵ Venture-Agent, Georgia—Atlanta aka The Masked Ferret

Thanks!

Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / Pathfinder Second Edition Demo Adventure: Torment and Legacy Sanctioning All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.