Shirren pronouns?


General Discussion


What do shirren use for hosts (the third sex besides males and females)?


2 people marked this as a favorite.

From the first adventure path:

"[redacted] is neither
male nor female, but host, the
third shirren sex, and as such
is referred to with the pronouns
“they,” “them,” and “themself.”
"

There's a shirren host npc.


I believe they're also referred to as Queens.


Kind of disappointing. I think it would be better if they had some words from their own language, like say, "Xev" for singular and "Xov" for plural. Would make them seem more, you know, alien.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Yqatuba wrote:
Kind of disappointing. I think it would be better if they had some words from their own language, like say, "Xev" for singular and "Xov" for plural. Would make them seem more, you know, alien.

That might be the case in their native language. But the words translate to "They", "Them", and "Themself" in 'common'(english) as those are the 'common' language pronouns that are not male or female.


Pathfinder Maps, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Maps, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

Note that gender even in purely human languages does not necessarily match biology. For example, I recall reading somewhere that Chinese has only a single 3rd person pronoun that can be used for either males or females -- far more practical when you are talking about an unknown person whose gender is unknown and/or of no interest to the speaker.

I wouldn't be surprised if the Shirren language uses a similar system.

Scarab Sages

1 person marked this as a favorite.

In English, there’s also the non-binary “Xe” which could be an option if “They” doesn’t work for you.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Would a female sex even be identifiable as such if the reproduction bottleneck was instead with the host? *mumbles off into semi coherent biology...*


He,She,Xe.

Shirren pronouns solved.


BigNorseWolf wrote:

Would a female sex even be identifiable as such if the reproduction bottleneck was instead with the host? *mumbles off into semi coherent biology...*

To other Shirren definitely, to other races debatable, it's going to come down to GM's fiat.


I sorta understood it as Shirren pronouns are words in the Shirren language and so are whirrs or clicks or whatever noises their mouthparts and if you don't speak the Shirren language then you aren't yourself Shirren so "what role this individual plays in Shirren reproduction" isn't any of your business.

So we're using the Spivak pronoun (e/em) for all Shirren.


Starfinder Superscriber
BigNorseWolf wrote:
Would a female sex even be identifiable as such if the reproduction bottleneck was instead with the host? *mumbles off into semi coherent biology...*

Sure, the female is the one that provides the larger gamete, the male is the one that provides the smaller gamete. What's a little unclear is whether the host has a gamete or some other way of providing genetic information, since the host does contribute genetic information.


Berggen wrote:
BigNorseWolf wrote:
Would a female sex even be identifiable as such if the reproduction bottleneck was instead with the host? *mumbles off into semi coherent biology...*
Sure, the female is the one that provides the larger gamete, the male is the one that provides the smaller gamete. What's a little unclear is whether the host has a gamete or some other way of providing genetic information, since the host does contribute genetic information.

I believe one of the books said that the host provides epigenetic influences. Which makes more than enough scientific sense for space opera.


Yqatuba wrote:
What do shirren use for hosts (the third sex besides males and females)?

The human language shouldn't encompass a 3rd sex. So in Common it should be up to the GM what people are referring to them. Maybe a new one like

He Him His
She Her Hers
Te Ter Tris

Or maybe some word play with "host"


Berggen wrote:
BigNorseWolf wrote:
Would a female sex even be identifiable as such if the reproduction bottleneck was instead with the host? *mumbles off into semi coherent biology...*
Sure, the female is the one that provides the larger gamete, the male is the one that provides the smaller gamete. What's a little unclear is whether the host has a gamete or some other way of providing genetic information, since the host does contribute genetic information.

What I mean is that the traits that define female are the product of the larger energy contribution in growing and maintaining the young, the level of sexual dimorphism tending towards proportional to the difference of energy contribution. The host is apparently the one that would apply to rather than the larger gamete.

*thinks they managed semi coherent...*


BigNorseWolf wrote:
Berggen wrote:
BigNorseWolf wrote:
Would a female sex even be identifiable as such if the reproduction bottleneck was instead with the host? *mumbles off into semi coherent biology...*
Sure, the female is the one that provides the larger gamete, the male is the one that provides the smaller gamete. What's a little unclear is whether the host has a gamete or some other way of providing genetic information, since the host does contribute genetic information.

What I mean is that the traits that define female are the product of the larger energy contribution in growing and maintaining the young, the level of sexual dimorphism tending towards proportional to the difference of energy contribution. The host is apparently the one that would apply to rather than the larger gamete.

I would propose to think of the host like a living nest whose body influences the way that the lifeform within grows. Without getting too graphic, the sexual interaction between a male and female would be mostly the same for an egg laying species. Then we could imagine an extra step in which the egg is laid within the host to continue incubation, much like many insect species who use other creatures to lay there eggs in, it just so happens that this species has a dedicated sex(who won't die) for this particular step of the process.

-Beta


Greydoch wrote:
BigNorseWolf wrote:
Berggen wrote:
BigNorseWolf wrote:
Would a female sex even be identifiable as such if the reproduction bottleneck was instead with the host? *mumbles off into semi coherent biology...*
Sure, the female is the one that provides the larger gamete, the male is the one that provides the smaller gamete. What's a little unclear is whether the host has a gamete or some other way of providing genetic information, since the host does contribute genetic information.

What I mean is that the traits that define female are the product of the larger energy contribution in growing and maintaining the young, the level of sexual dimorphism tending towards proportional to the difference of energy contribution. The host is apparently the one that would apply to rather than the larger gamete.

I would propose to think of the host like a living nest whose body influences the way that the lifeform within grows. Without getting too graphic, the sexual interaction between a male and female would be mostly the same for an egg laying species. Then we could imagine an extra step in which the egg is laid within the host to continue incubation, much like many insect species who use other creatures to lay there eggs in, it just so happens that this species has a dedicated sex(who won't die) for this particular step of the process.

-Beta

Random theory/idea: the Shirren, when they originally came into being, did not have three sexes, they had two. However, this was a problem, because their reproductive cycle was predatory-parasitic: have sex, implant eggs in immobilized prey creatures, young eat their way out while victim is still alive and screaming. Since for a species that is neither a nonsentient hive mind nor a complete monstrousity, this method of propagation was abominable, they engineered up a third gender pretty dang quick to provide an alternative, nondestructive method of hosting their young.

Community / Forums / Starfinder / Starfinder General Discussion / Shirren pronouns? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Starfinder General Discussion