Should GMs focus on running the playtest rulebook RAW, or should they integrate direct developer word on how mechanics are supposed to work?

[Colette Brunel]

Should GMs focus on running the playtest rulebook RAW, or should they integrate direct developer word on how mechanics are supposed to work?

For example, there seems to be a kerfluffle over Lay on Hands. Apparently, Mark Seifter and possibly other Paizo people claim that with Warded Touch (a mandatory feat tax), Lay on Hands does not need a free hand. However, nowhere does this appear in the rulebook RAW.

As another example, sorcerers and wizards are untrained in unarmored defense by RAW, yet the pregenerated Ezren seems to suggest otherwise.

The above are merely examples, howeveer. What should GMs prioritize for the purpose of a consistent playtest, the rulebook RAW, or direct developer word?

[DM Livgin]

I doubt any single interpretation is enough to skew the survey results. So... try it both ways and them let the forum know what way makes a better game?

[Sebastian Hirsch]

I plan to include any developer clarifications.