River of Sticks |
Hopefully this is the right place. Wanted to check that I am understanding the rules elements correctly on the Wildblooded Sorcerer. To me it seems mechanically the same as domains vs sub-domains, and if I understand the ruling correctly, it would logically extend that clerics cannot select both an archetype that modifies the domain class feature and a sub-domain (yes, I know that’s not the rules).
Anyhow. Actual question. Am I correct that the FAQ from 2013 means that a Tattooed Wildblooded (Empyreal) is illegal because Tattooed Sorcerer replaces the 9th level power, and per the FAQ Wildblooded is interpreted as altering the 9th level power? Similarly, a Tattooed Wildblooded (Sage) is illegal because the Tattooed Sorcerer replaces the 1st level power and Wildblooded is interpreted as altering the 1st level power?
Would either a Wildblooded Empyreal with Bloodline Familiar (celestial) or Wildblooded Sage with Bloodline Familiar (Arcane) fall afoul of this FAQ, or any other rules elements?