Spellscribed Armor: Ironic illegality


Pathfinder Society

Grand Lodge 4/5

4 people marked this as a favorite.

I was rereading Armor Masters Handbook (weighing the Tower Shield feats vs Tower Shield Specialist, which this PC is) when I notice something ironic about Spell scribed Armor.

It's illegal in PFS play, which I thought was a shame given tattooed spells is legal, but according to the book it was a Society member that rediscovered the lost art!

Ironic yes? ;)

Scarab Sages 4/5 5/55/5 *

1 person marked this as a favorite.

They should have an addendum to the Additional Resources that states that any feature described as invented or commonly used by the Pathfinder Society should be legal for organized play.

Grand Lodge 4/5

Rereading the section, I think they should have limited the slots for each armor to something than armor bonus

I mean a war priest with an Armor of +8 armor bonus (or higher) rocking aces to 8 Spell levels of 'scrolls' is a bit much. Tattooed spells have a restriction to slot and reasonable access (you can't read the tat on your back slot...)

Sovereign Court 5/5

the 8 spell levels never seemed that bad to me. at most ur looking at 8 1st lvl spells on the full plate armor. i think the biggest issue is the crafting rules that apply.

Grand Lodge 4/5

Sarvei taeno wrote:
the 8 spell levels never seemed that bad to me. at most ur looking at 8 1st lvl spells on the full plate armor. i think the biggest issue is the crafting rules that apply.

No more impactful than buying a scroll or spell tattoo I'd say. We are allowed to figure base cost for buying scrolls, potions, spell tattoos and wands..

I think it's the potential to 'load out' your armor that got the ban

Dark Archive 4/5 5/5 ** Venture-Agent, Australia—QLD—Brisbane

Quote:
Ironic yes? ;)

Kind of, but not really. There are also likely in-universe Pathfinder Society members who can craft magic items, but no Player Character can. That's all the PFS-legal thing means - whether or not a PC can have the option, not whether or not it exists at all in the setting.

Grand Lodge 4/5

I still don't get why the ban, if you're worried about players doubling up make it an either or..tattooed or spellscribe but not both.

Cause I got armored casters who aren't into ink...


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Pathfinder Maps, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Maps, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber; Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber

To complete the flavor of the ban, they really need to mention putting a price on the head of the Pathfinder society member who created it. ;)

Grand Lodge 4/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Should make a cameo in a scenario,, lying dead in a ditch with Osprey sending to look for his friend....;)

1/5 5/5

Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

Better yet, dead in a ditch NEXT to Osprey's corpse.

Grand Lodge 4/5

Wei Ji the Learner wrote:


Better yet, dead in a ditch NEXT to Osprey's corpse.

While being Osprey's peer, friend, ally, contact and/or lover is a recipe for a bad life (and the aforementioned final end in the ditch) the guy himself seems to be thriving...

Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / Spellscribed Armor: Ironic illegality All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.