"That's not the rule in Pathfinder, that's a Starfinder rule!"


Pathfinder Society

Sovereign Court 5/5

I haven't seen this yet, but has anyone else encountered the problem of rules from one game being used in the other yet?

Kind of like all the 3.5 to PF rule changes and how for years we would have to explain that "Spot" and "Search" and "Listen" were all part of "Perception" now and they weren't rolled as different skills... or that sleep has a full round casting time...

I know I will (in time) encounter someone doing XXX and when I ask about it, they are going to explain that that's the rule. But then when we look it up they'll say "Oh, that's the rule in (the other game system)" - even if it isn't.

Scarab Sages 5/5 5/5 *** Venture-Captain, Netherlands

When I'm tired I will call it dangerous terrain instead of difficult terrain.


Pathfinder Lost Omens, Rulebook Subscriber

i play alot of 5e and pathfinder and I think the issue I often have the most is what provokes an "attack of opportunity" in each system. And yes I know 5e doesn't call it that but it's just easier to use the term for both.

Liberty's Edge 2/5 5/5 **

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I literally just had someone complaining to me about how unfair it is to have a gunslinger with a bigger hit die than a ranger.

Rangers, of course, haven't been a d8 class since 3.5...

Sczarni 5/5 5/55/5 ***

I do still get 3.5 mixed up with PF. I'm sure my Starfinder rulings will become an amalgam of the three.

4/5 5/5 Venture-Lieutenant, Finland—Tampere

1 person marked this as a favorite.

NiTessine will forever think the paladin's casting stat is Wisdom and I will never stop making fun of him for it. (We've been in a PFRPG campaign together for literally years, I've been playing a paladin the whole time.)

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Minna Hiltula wrote:
NiTessine will forever think the paladin's casting stat is Wisdom and I will never stop making fun of him for it. (We've been in a PFRPG campaign together for literally years, I've been playing a paladin the whole time.)

Tortured Crusader FTW!

2/5

5 people marked this as a favorite.

I still get old-school people who think that plants, undead, and constructs are blanket immune to crits and sneak attack, because that's how it worked in 3.5.

Silver Crusade 5/5 5/55/5 **** Venture-Captain, Germany—Bavaria

A couple of weeks ago I was pretty certain that material based DR still allowed you to overcome that DR... I was wrong, but it shows to never trust yourself.

Considering the things that were already mentioned in the blog... 5ft. steps will really trip me up^^

Silver Crusade 3/5

Muse. wrote:
or that sleep has a full round casting time...

Did not know that until just now (and I am not a 3.5 Veteran). I have been playing over a year and never caught that.

Shadow Lodge 4/5

ThePuppyTurtle wrote:
Muse. wrote:
or that sleep has a full round casting time...
Did not know that until just now (and I am not a 3.5 Veteran). I have been playing over a year and never caught that.

Sleep has a 1-round casting time in both systems (which is different than a full round).

Sovereign Court 5/5

Sammy T wrote:
ThePuppyTurtle wrote:
Muse. wrote:
or that sleep has a full round casting time...
Did not know that until just now (and I am not a 3.5 Veteran). I have been playing over a year and never caught that.
Sleep has a 1-round casting time in both systems (which is different than a full round).

It actually was a 3.5 change from 3.0. And at some point in there it went from 2d4 dice effected to a fixed 4 HD....

And don't get me started on Darkness effects (in 3.5 Darkness shed "shadowy illumination" so you could light up a dark cave with a Darkness spell).

Grand Lodge 2/5

Sebastian Hirsch wrote:

A couple of weeks ago I was pretty certain that material based DR still allowed you to overcome that DR... I was wrong, but it shows to never trust yourself.

Considering the things that were already mentioned in the blog... 5ft. steps will really trip me up^^

I'm not sure I follow, you mean you thought that an adamantine golem that has DR 10/adamantine could get through the DR of his twin?

Sovereign Court 4/5 5/5 ** Venture-Lieutenant, Netherlands—Leiden

claudekennilol wrote:
Sebastian Hirsch wrote:

A couple of weeks ago I was pretty certain that material based DR still allowed you to overcome that DR... I was wrong, but it shows to never trust yourself.

Considering the things that were already mentioned in the blog... 5ft. steps will really trip me up^^

I'm not sure I follow, you mean you thought that an adamantine golem that has DR 10/adamantine could get through the DR of his twin?

Or werewolves fighting each other.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Lau Bannenberg wrote:
claudekennilol wrote:
Sebastian Hirsch wrote:

A couple of weeks ago I was pretty certain that material based DR still allowed you to overcome that DR... I was wrong, but it shows to never trust yourself.

Considering the things that were already mentioned in the blog... 5ft. steps will really trip me up^^

I'm not sure I follow, you mean you thought that an adamantine golem that has DR 10/adamantine could get through the DR of his twin?
Or werewolves fighting each other.

*nods*

I always thought it was a rule too.

Grand Lodge 5/5

Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Society Subscriber

It's simply not reading the universal monster rule on damage reduction well enough.

Creatures with DR/Magic count as hitting magical with their natural weapons for overcoming damage reduction (same goes for DR/Epic creatuers)
Creatures with an alignment subtype count as hitting with that alignment on their natural & manufactured weapons.

I'd say it's not that unusual to also apply it to material damage reduction if that bit hasn't been read carefully :)

Silver Crusade 4/5 5/55/55/5 RPG Superstar 2013 Top 8

Rysky wrote:
Lau Bannenberg wrote:
claudekennilol wrote:
Sebastian Hirsch wrote:

A couple of weeks ago I was pretty certain that material based DR still allowed you to overcome that DR... I was wrong, but it shows to never trust yourself.

Considering the things that were already mentioned in the blog... 5ft. steps will really trip me up^^

I'm not sure I follow, you mean you thought that an adamantine golem that has DR 10/adamantine could get through the DR of his twin?
Or werewolves fighting each other.

*nods*

I always thought it was a rule too.

It is a rule for alignment subtypes and alignment-based DR, but not material-based DR.

PRD Damage Reduction wrote:
Some monsters are vulnerable to good-, evil-, chaotically, or lawfully aligned weapons... A creature with an alignment subtype (chaotic, evil, good, or lawful) can overcome this type of damage reduction with its natural weapons and weapons it wields as if the weapons or natural weapons had an alignment (or alignments) that matched the subtype(s) of the creature.

Silver Crusade

*nods*

Yep, it was pointed out to me that it didn't include Material DR awhile ago, I still run it that it does as a houserule though.

Grand Lodge 4/5 5/55/5 ** Venture-Lieutenant, Florida—Melbourne

8 people marked this as a favorite.

What do you mean you have an Elf Paladin? Elves can't take levels in Paladin and you don't even have the requisite 17 or higher Charisma.

Silver Crusade

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Bill Baldwin wrote:
What do you mean you have an Elf Paladin? Elves can't take levels in Paladin and you don't even have the requisite 17 or higher Charisma.

*eye twitch*

*eye twitch*

Sovereign Court 5/5

I seem to recall that Material DR was the rule in 3.5 as well, as were creatures could hit and injure each other (were-wolf could hit were-rat could hit were-bear etc. thru the DR Silver).

Or maybe it was a 3.0 rule?

Grand Lodge 5/5

Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Society Subscriber
Muse. wrote:

I seem to recall that Material DR was the rule in 3.5 as well, as were creatures could hit and injure each other (were-wolf could hit were-rat could hit were-bear etc. thru the DR Silver).

Or maybe it was a 3.0 rule?

That may be 3.0.

The rules from 3.5 are exactly the same as those of pathfinder in terms of damage reduction and overcoming them (as far as I can find)

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2011 Top 32

I just found out a week ago that claws are bludgeoning/slashing weapons in Pathfinder, when they were piercing/slashing in 3.5.

Scarab Sages

I know that as I become more familiar with the starfinder rules, I'm going to want to use them in pathfinfer. All of the previews seem make the rules more streamlined and balanced.

Liberty's Edge 5/5

5 people marked this as a favorite.
Starfinder Superscriber
Bill Baldwin wrote:
What do you mean you have an Elf Paladin? Elves can't take levels in Paladin and you don't even have the requisite 17 or higher Charisma.

...and there's no way you can be a bard, because you have to have all those fighter and thief levels first!

Dark Archive 4/5 5/5 *

Acrobatics or Athletics - let me see your character sheet a minute!

2/5

technarken wrote:
I still get old-school people who think that plants, undead, and constructs are blanket immune to crits and sneak attack, because that's how it worked in 3.5.

Even some of the multi-star GMs at our local PFS games have to take a sec to remind themselves of that one from time to time.

Sovereign Court 5/5

Tim Emrick wrote:
technarken wrote:
I still get old-school people who think that plants, undead, and constructs are blanket immune to crits and sneak attack, because that's how it worked in 3.5.
Even some of the multi-star GMs at our local PFS games have to take a sec to remind themselves of that one from time to time.

Last time I encountered it, it was from someone who hadn't been playing many years... so not sure where they picked it up. Some older player most likely, passing on little tidbits of rules knowledge - but from a different rules set.

Lantern Lodge 5/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Always trust a GM, never trust a DM.

4/5 Designer

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Muse. wrote:

I haven't seen this yet, but has anyone else encountered the problem of rules from one game being used in the other yet?

Kind of like all the 3.5 to PF rule changes and how for years we would have to explain that "Spot" and "Search" and "Listen" were all part of "Perception" now and they weren't rolled as different skills... or that sleep has a full round casting time...

I know I will (in time) encounter someone doing XXX and when I ask about it, they are going to explain that that's the rule. But then when we look it up they'll say "Oh, that's the rule in (the other game system)" - even if it isn't.

Yes, I've definitely seen that when running Starfinder, though I don't expect many other people have yet.

Sovereign Court 5/5

Mark Seifter wrote:
Muse. wrote:

I haven't seen this yet, but has anyone else encountered the problem of rules from one game being used in the other yet?

Kind of like all the 3.5 to PF rule changes and how for years we would have to explain that "Spot" and "Search" and "Listen" were all part of "Perception" now and they weren't rolled as different skills... or that sleep has a full round casting time...

I know I will (in time) encounter someone doing XXX and when I ask about it, they are going to explain that that's the rule. But then when we look it up they'll say "Oh, that's the rule in (the other game system)" - even if it isn't.

Yes, I've definitely seen that when running Starfinder, though I don't expect many other people have yet.

and I fully expect to see it running the other way...

4/5

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Sometimes I'm so glad that I had a 17 year break between the D&D Basic red box and picking up Pathfinder.

Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / "That's not the rule in Pathfinder, that's a Starfinder rule!" All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.