Why the resistance to limiting spellcasters?


Pathfinder First Edition General Discussion

1,051 to 1,100 of 1,237 << first < prev | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | next > last >>

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Does everyone realize we're just telling stories. Take a step back and remember that it's all just made up. The designers certainly don't care, half this stuff is just the things they made up in their living room.

Golarion isn't Pathfinder

Your Pathfinder isn't mine.

We get to pick whatever we want from whatever sources and use it to entertain ourselves and fellow players.

There is no heresy. Only new life

I love you all.


_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:

So a Demon Lord beat a god. Like I said. And level 20 full casters can beat demon lords. Seriously, what part do you not get?

The part where you think the word 'was' == 'is'.

Seriously, I don't understand that. Can you explain, grammatically speaking, how words that mean two different things somehow mean the same thing?

I think once you explain that, all will become clear.

You do know that when Lamashtu beat Curchanus she was a demon lord.

Therefore, in lore demon lords can beat gods.

Level 20 full casters can beat demon lords.

Therefore, in lore level 20 full casters can beat gods.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:

So a Demon Lord beat a god. Like I said. And level 20 full casters can beat demon lords. Seriously, what part do you not get?

The part where you think the word 'was' == 'is'.

Seriously, I don't understand that. Can you explain, grammatically speaking, how words that mean two different things somehow mean the same thing?

I think once you explain that, all will become clear.

You do know that when Lamashtu beat Curchanus she was a demon lord.

Therefore, in lore demon lords can beat gods.

Level 20 full casters can beat demon lords.

Therefore, in lore level 20 full casters can beat gods.

Do you have the play-by-play of the fight? Mechanically speaking...

How many hitpoints did he have at the time?


_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:

[

Without a stat block a god is incapable of doing anything.

Wrong, they are capable of everything.
*Citation needed.
Sure: Rule 0.
Rule 0 says nothing about it.
On the contrary, it says everything about it.

From on GM to another let me assure you, on this subject Rule 0 is silent.


Anzyr wrote:


From on GM to another let me assure you, on this subject Rule 0 is silent.

Let me assure you that it is not.


_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:

So a Demon Lord beat a god. Like I said. And level 20 full casters can beat demon lords. Seriously, what part do you not get?

The part where you think the word 'was' == 'is'.

Seriously, I don't understand that. Can you explain, grammatically speaking, how words that mean two different things somehow mean the same thing?

I think once you explain that, all will become clear.

You do know that when Lamashtu beat Curchanus she was a demon lord.

Therefore, in lore demon lords can beat gods.

Level 20 full casters can beat demon lords.

Therefore, in lore level 20 full casters can beat gods.

Do you have the play-by-play of the fight? Mechanically speaking...

I have provided more evidence supporting my argument than you have presented for yours. Show me any indication in lore that a god can one shot a level 20 full caster (not that would do anything but inconvenience them, but it's a start).


_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:

[

Without a stat block a god is incapable of doing anything.

Wrong, they are capable of everything.
*Citation needed.
Sure: Rule 0.

Which means your interpretation of the gods is as valid as mine and we're back to square one


From one GM to another, Rule 0 talks to me all the time. Sometimes very loudly.

As far as Lamashtu beating Curchanus, there's not a lot of information on how, on exactly what happened and why it happened. Maybe someone will enlighten us, or it will be a mystery like the death of Aroden. Regardless, it's not a benchmark of what someone can do without a lot more data. It's a plot point.


Plot can slay anything and it's the only thing that can slay a god.


_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:


From on GM to another let me assure you, on this subject Rule 0 is silent.
Let me assure you that it is not.

*Popo voice*

Oh look a GM that doesn't know any better.

*Popo voice off*

Rule 0 only works if everyone agrees and clearly I do not agree.


Anzyr wrote:
I have provided more evidence supporting my argument than you have presented for yours. Show me any indication in lore that a god can one shot a level 20 full caster (not that would do anything but inconvenience them, but it's a start).

Very well, let's have a contest. I'll be the DM playing a god, you can be any 20th level character you choose, with any amount of magic items.

I predict I will be able to kill you, permanently, in one hit. And you won't be able to point to any rule that contradicts me.

Do you disagree?


_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
I have provided more evidence supporting my argument than you have presented for yours. Show me any indication in lore that a god can one shot a level 20 full caster (not that would do anything but inconvenience them, but it's a start).

Very well, let's have a contest. I'll be the DM playing a god, you can be any 20th level character you choose, with any amount of magic items.

I predict I will be able to kill you, permanently, in one hit. And you won't be able to point to any rule that contradicts me.

Do you disagree?

Yes, I deny rule 0 and it fails to work. Rule 0 only works if all the players agree.


Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:


From on GM to another let me assure you, on this subject Rule 0 is silent.
Let me assure you that it is not.

*Popo voice*

Oh look a GM that doesn't know any better.

*Popo voice off*

Rule 0 only works if everyone agrees and clearly I do not agree.

Pecking order.


Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
I have provided more evidence supporting my argument than you have presented for yours. Show me any indication in lore that a god can one shot a level 20 full caster (not that would do anything but inconvenience them, but it's a start).

Very well, let's have a contest. I'll be the DM playing a god, you can be any 20th level character you choose, with any amount of magic items.

I predict I will be able to kill you, permanently, in one hit. And you won't be able to point to any rule that contradicts me.

Do you disagree?

Yes, I deny rule 0 and it fails to work. Rule 0 only works if all the players agree.

Who's talking about rule 0? I'm setting up a scenario. I'm playing a god, you're playing a 20th level character.


Unfortunately Ozy, I also will be playing a god and I will protect Anzyr's 20th level caster, because when the gods want to make us suffer they answer our prayers.


And you get to leave the game. So that's not exactly denying it or playing.

Regardless, as pointed out above Iomedae barely tries in AP #77 and can deafen/blind/knock out PCs. If she actually wanted to kill them, it appears that it wouldn't matter about their level.


The Sword wrote:
Unfortunately Ozy, I also will be playing a god and I will protect Anzyr's 20th level caster, because when the gods want to make us suffer they answer our prayers.

Ah, well 1 god vs 1 god + a 20th level character is certainly another matter.

I have no problem conceding that 1 god is equivalent in power to 1 god + 20th level character.


Anzyr wrote:
thejeff wrote:
kyrt-ryder wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
kyrt-ryder wrote:
see timestop and Gate and Shapechange
Your obtuse comment doesn't change the fact that in Pathfinder, Gods are to 20th level characters as 20th level characters are to 1st level.

Prove it.

Quote:
There is simply no comparison, power-wise, ability-wise, immortality-wise, the ability to grant spells, and about a dozen other metrics.

Except all the level 17+ characters in my games match all those criterion.

Oh, one slight hoiserule though. I don't do 'god granted spells.' Divine magic is powered by faith, not the whim of some a@$+##@ in another plain.

Right. Because you're not playing PF. Straight PF rules 17+ characters don't match those criteria.
Divine Source disagrees with you.

Divine Source is a Mythic ability and thus not available to most PF characters. Mythic does change the rules a bit and 17+ level, 8+ tier characters are getting up into that range.


_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
I have provided more evidence supporting my argument than you have presented for yours. Show me any indication in lore that a god can one shot a level 20 full caster (not that would do anything but inconvenience them, but it's a start).

Very well, let's have a contest. I'll be the DM playing a god, you can be any 20th level character you choose, with any amount of magic items.

I predict I will be able to kill you, permanently, in one hit. And you won't be able to point to any rule that contradicts me.

Do you disagree?

Yes, I deny rule 0 and it fails to work. Rule 0 only works if all the players agree.
Who's talking about rule 0? I'm setting up a scenario. I'm playing a god, you're playing a 20th level character.

Ok, please cite the page of the ability the god is using to kill my character. If you cannot you are using rule 0, which will be denied.

[Popo]Enjoy the climb back up![/Popo]


Is a character without a universe dead? In which case does the DM leaving the table kill the character. If it doesn't, do all our characters - past, present and future -
still exist, silently screaming?


4 people marked this as a favorite.

I'm pretty sure rule 0 works even if the players don't agree.

I mean, one player's desire to play a Musket Master in my game doesn't overrule my decision that there are no guns around anywhere.


thejeff wrote:
kyrt-ryder wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
kyrt-ryder wrote:
That consistency comes to me by way of level. A character who evolves all the way to level 20 without becoming a god [such as erastil or abadar or Cayden Calean] breaks my sense of verisimilitude.

I don't really understand this. Gods are a hell of a lot more powerful than 20th level characters, and they are also casters.

Are you suggesting that once a character hits 20th level, they should ascend to divinity automatically?

Level 17 is the mark of divinity in my games.

Erastil, Asmodeus, Pharasma... Level 17-20.

Also I have Cayden Calean, Torag and Rovagug as pure martial. [Erastil is a Ranger style light casting martial.]

Yeah, I agree with Ozy, you're playing a pretty different game. You're buffing even the casters at least for the last tier, if I understand you.

If raising Evocation up to on par with the other schools is a true buff [rather than keeping everything roughly on par] then yes I am slightly buffing them but that is all.

Quote:
And pulling the gods way down.

My interpretation of the gods is WAY DOWN from what Paizo says they are, yes. Still makes the majority of mythological deities wet themselves.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
kyrt-ryder wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
kyrt-ryder wrote:
see timestop and Gate and Shapechange
Your obtuse comment doesn't change the fact that in Pathfinder, Gods are to 20th level characters as 20th level characters are to 1st level.
Prove it.

OK. A 20th level character can kill a 1st level character with one hit. A god can kill a 20th level character with one hit.

Citation needed. Error 707 Statblock not found.
Yeah, exactly.
Without a stat block a god is incapable of doing anything.

Oh right. You're that guy.

Never mind the whole damn argument.

Takes off, burns the thread from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.


knightnday wrote:

And you get to leave the game. So that's not exactly denying it or playing.

Regardless, as pointed out above Iomedae barely tries in AP #77 and can deafen/blind/knock out PCs. If she actually wanted to kill them, it appears that it wouldn't matter about their level.

You know most full casters can cure those ailments and ignore the damage being dealt casually right?


Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
I have provided more evidence supporting my argument than you have presented for yours. Show me any indication in lore that a god can one shot a level 20 full caster (not that would do anything but inconvenience them, but it's a start).

Very well, let's have a contest. I'll be the DM playing a god, you can be any 20th level character you choose, with any amount of magic items.

I predict I will be able to kill you, permanently, in one hit. And you won't be able to point to any rule that contradicts me.

Do you disagree?

Yes, I deny rule 0 and it fails to work. Rule 0 only works if all the players agree.
Who's talking about rule 0? I'm setting up a scenario. I'm playing a god, you're playing a 20th level character.

Ok, please cite the page of the ability the god is using to kill my character. If you cannot you are using rule 0, which will be denied.

[Popo]Enjoy the climb back up![/Popo]

? Obviously the statblock has to come from the GM since it doesn't exist. There are no rules limiting how I generate the statblock, so clearly anything in that statblock is de facto not in violation of the Pathfinder ruleset.

If my god has an (Ex) ability called 'Destroy Soul', well heck, that's just too bad for your character.


Anzyr. Jeff pushed the Zen-oh button.


What is popo?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
I have provided more evidence supporting my argument than you have presented for yours. Show me any indication in lore that a god can one shot a level 20 full caster (not that would do anything but inconvenience them, but it's a start).

Very well, let's have a contest. I'll be the DM playing a god, you can be any 20th level character you choose, with any amount of magic items.

I predict I will be able to kill you, permanently, in one hit. And you won't be able to point to any rule that contradicts me.

Do you disagree?

Yes, I deny rule 0 and it fails to work. Rule 0 only works if all the players agree.
Who's talking about rule 0? I'm setting up a scenario. I'm playing a god, you're playing a 20th level character.

Ok, please cite the page of the ability the god is using to kill my character. If you cannot you are using rule 0, which will be denied.

[Popo]Enjoy the climb back up![/Popo]

? Obviously the statblock has to come from the GM since it doesn't exist. There are no rules limiting how I generate the statblock, so clearly anything in that statblock is de facto not in violation of the Pathfinder ruleset.

If my god has an (Ex) ability called 'Destroy Soul', well heck, that's just too bad for your character.

If the statblock comes from the GM, then why the heck am I getting so much grief from people over how the gods are stated in my games?

I don't LIKE the freakishly ridiculously powerful 'these are unapproachable entities that still possess personalities that cannot be killed nor can they be surpassed' narrative Paizo provides.


_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
I have provided more evidence supporting my argument than you have presented for yours. Show me any indication in lore that a god can one shot a level 20 full caster (not that would do anything but inconvenience them, but it's a start).

Very well, let's have a contest. I'll be the DM playing a god, you can be any 20th level character you choose, with any amount of magic items.

I predict I will be able to kill you, permanently, in one hit. And you won't be able to point to any rule that contradicts me.

Do you disagree?

Yes, I deny rule 0 and it fails to work. Rule 0 only works if all the players agree.
Who's talking about rule 0? I'm setting up a scenario. I'm playing a god, you're playing a 20th level character.

Ok, please cite the page of the ability the god is using to kill my character. If you cannot you are using rule 0, which will be denied.

[Popo]Enjoy the climb back up![/Popo]

? Obviously the statblock has to come from the GM since it doesn't exist. There are no rules limiting how I generate the statblock, so clearly anything in that statblock is de facto not in violation of the Pathfinder ruleset.

If my god has an (Ex) ability called 'Destroy Soul', well heck, that's just too bad for your character.

That is rule 0 and therefore I just deny it. I have a better idea, we'll pick a neutral GM to decide the contest. All Pathfinder sources are allowed, we'll both submit our sheets and than have a good old fashioned duel. I nominate kyrt-ryder as the GM. Just send him the gods sheet and we'll see if what you say is correct.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Anzyr wrote:
knightnday wrote:

And you get to leave the game. So that's not exactly denying it or playing.

Regardless, as pointed out above Iomedae barely tries in AP #77 and can deafen/blind/knock out PCs. If she actually wanted to kill them, it appears that it wouldn't matter about their level.

You know most full casters can cure those ailments and ignore the damage being dealt casually right?

Well, the book says a that the conditions aren't curable save by a deity's will. I know you believe full casters are all powerful, but they aren't deities. Maybe they have one in their pocket?


The Sword wrote:
What is popo?

We have passed the meme event horizon. It's all down hill from here


Johnnycat93 wrote:
The Sword wrote:
What is popo?
We have passed the meme event horizon. It's all down hill from here

Popo


knightnday wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
knightnday wrote:

And you get to leave the game. So that's not exactly denying it or playing.

Regardless, as pointed out above Iomedae barely tries in AP #77 and can deafen/blind/knock out PCs. If she actually wanted to kill them, it appears that it wouldn't matter about their level.

You know most full casters can cure those ailments and ignore the damage being dealt casually right?
Well, the book says a that the conditions aren't curable save by a deity's will. I know you believe full casters are all powerful, but they aren't deities. Maybe they have one in their pocket?

Miracle.


3 people marked this as a favorite.

Denying Rule 0 isn't a thing. Well, unless you are packing your things to leave, at least at my table.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

If a level 20 character takes down a Demon Lord, the GM is phoning it in.


knightnday wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
knightnday wrote:

And you get to leave the game. So that's not exactly denying it or playing.

Regardless, as pointed out above Iomedae barely tries in AP #77 and can deafen/blind/knock out PCs. If she actually wanted to kill them, it appears that it wouldn't matter about their level.

You know most full casters can cure those ailments and ignore the damage being dealt casually right?
Well, the book says a that the conditions aren't curable save by a deity's will. I know you believe full casters are all powerful, but they aren't deities. Maybe they have one in their pocket?

Unless rule zero is being used to say that the characters ARE deities.


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Anzyr wrote:
knightnday wrote:

And you get to leave the game. So that's not exactly denying it or playing.

Regardless, as pointed out above Iomedae barely tries in AP #77 and can deafen/blind/knock out PCs. If she actually wanted to kill them, it appears that it wouldn't matter about their level.

You know most full casters can cure those ailments and ignore the damage being dealt casually right?

You really ARE being that guy, you know? If a god decides to kill a mortal.. it really is "Rocks Fall, You Die" type of scenario. They don't have to roll to hit, they don't have to roll SR, and they can pretty much ignore any kind of protection you think you have.

The reason Gods don't do this on a regular basis, is because mortals live on the material plane, and the Gods of Golarion have an unspoken level of a "hands off" mutual agreement regarding it, instead opting to act through proxies instead. Iomedae comes close to crossing that line, she might even do so, when she aids the heroes in Wrath of the Righteous, and she might be paying for it in Hell's Vengeance.


Ahh, YouTube illumined me.

I'm worried, very worried that that could be future of Pathfinder...


kyrt-ryder wrote:
I don't LIKE the freakishly ridiculously powerful 'these are unapproachable entities that still possess personalities that cannot be killed nor can they be surpassed' narrative Paizo provides.

I mean, that's why rule 0 is important. If you want to run "let's beat up Pharasma" as a campaign premise, nobody at Paizo is going to come to your house and make you stop.

The only person who can make these "how can the PCs beat up Pharasma" calls is the GM, however.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Anzyr wrote:
knightnday wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
knightnday wrote:

And you get to leave the game. So that's not exactly denying it or playing.

Regardless, as pointed out above Iomedae barely tries in AP #77 and can deafen/blind/knock out PCs. If she actually wanted to kill them, it appears that it wouldn't matter about their level.

You know most full casters can cure those ailments and ignore the damage being dealt casually right?
Well, the book says a that the conditions aren't curable save by a deity's will. I know you believe full casters are all powerful, but they aren't deities. Maybe they have one in their pocket?
Miracle.

Miracle is a request from a deity. Which is leaving it the GM's hands that whatever power providing this energy wants to intervene on your behalf for being a prat to another god. i wouldn't give it good odds, given that is dragging them into a pissing contest with another major power.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
knightnday wrote:
Denying Rule 0 isn't a thing. Well, unless youI are I am packing your my things to leave, at least at my table and you are now the groups GM.

I replace such GMs.


Are gods and DMs the only ones who can create artifacts?

Kyrt? What's your view on major Artefacts?


4 people marked this as a favorite.
Anzyr wrote:
knightnday wrote:
Denying Rule 0 isn't a thing. Well, unless youI are I am packing your my things to leave, at least at my table and you are now the groups GM.

I replace such GMs.

And I'm sure GMs replace 'such players' more often.


knightnday wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
knightnday wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
knightnday wrote:

And you get to leave the game. So that's not exactly denying it or playing.

Regardless, as pointed out above Iomedae barely tries in AP #77 and can deafen/blind/knock out PCs. If she actually wanted to kill them, it appears that it wouldn't matter about their level.

You know most full casters can cure those ailments and ignore the damage being dealt casually right?
Well, the book says a that the conditions aren't curable save by a deity's will. I know you believe full casters are all powerful, but they aren't deities. Maybe they have one in their pocket?
Miracle.
Miracle is a request from a deity. Which is leaving it the GM's hands that whatever power providing this energy wants to intervene on your behalf for being a prat to another god. i wouldn't give it good odds, given that is dragging them into a pissing contest with another major power.

Alternatively, the caster could just dismiss their Astral Projection and recast it.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Anzyr wrote:
knightnday wrote:
Denying Rule 0 isn't a thing. Well, unless youI are I am packing your my things to leave, at least at my table and you are now the groups GM.

I replace such GMs.

That would be interesting to see. Also, disagreeing isn't being a bad GM. But you would be welcome to take over if you wish .. well, and if the rest of the table agrees.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

And I personally could not give less of a s%*% about this, the world's most pointless dick measuring contest.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
knightnday wrote:
Denying Rule 0 isn't a thing. Well, unless youI are I am packing your my things to leave, at least at my table and you are now the groups GM.

I replace such GMs.

And I'm sure GMs replace 'such players' more often.

You would be surprised I think how many GMs players will replace when someone else is willing to do it.


Anzyr wrote:
knightnday wrote:
Denying Rule 0 isn't a thing. Well, unless youI are I am packing your my things to leave, at least at my table and you are now the groups GM.

I replace such GMs.

Seriously though, on what basis would you contest a writeup of a God?

What pathfinder rules would you point to, to say the GM was being 'bad' or 'unfair'?


Anzyr wrote:
knightnday wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
knightnday wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
knightnday wrote:

And you get to leave the game. So that's not exactly denying it or playing.

Regardless, as pointed out above Iomedae barely tries in AP #77 and can deafen/blind/knock out PCs. If she actually wanted to kill them, it appears that it wouldn't matter about their level.

You know most full casters can cure those ailments and ignore the damage being dealt casually right?
Well, the book says a that the conditions aren't curable save by a deity's will. I know you believe full casters are all powerful, but they aren't deities. Maybe they have one in their pocket?
Miracle.
Miracle is a request from a deity. Which is leaving it the GM's hands that whatever power providing this energy wants to intervene on your behalf for being a prat to another god. i wouldn't give it good odds, given that is dragging them into a pissing contest with another major power.
Alternatively, the caster could just dismiss their Astral Projection and recast it.

Because Iomedae couldn't strike your real body if she wanted? Or dismiss you from Her presence. Or destroy all your clones? I mean, if Gods are really just uber casters -- and uber casters are so uber -- you are well and truly screwed.


Anzyr wrote:
_Ozy_ wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
knightnday wrote:
Denying Rule 0 isn't a thing. Well, unless youI are I am packing your my things to leave, at least at my table and you are now the groups GM.

I replace such GMs.

And I'm sure GMs replace 'such players' more often.
You would be surprised I think how many GMs players will replace when someone else is willing to do it.

At level 20 I'm not surprised, probably just for the chance to start at level 1 again blessedly.

1,051 to 1,100 of 1,237 << first < prev | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / General Discussion / Why the resistance to limiting spellcasters? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.