Diego Rossi |
As an aside however, when you strike someone in melee, you are targeting that person. you can swing a melee weapon while blinded with a miss-chance to hit, therefor have you targeted something you cannot see. I'msure if given enough time, i could find severalmore obvious interactions that show the statement to be false, but again, thatwas not the intent of this post. If you want to argue it more with me, i can make another one.
You can attack someone that you have pinpointed. And only with melee attack. Nether was applicable against the demon.In any other situation you attack a square, not a creature.
You have a problem with the GM ruling, but it was perfectly legal
The LoS question was not the question for this post, but, can a creature that has been Antagonized be able to target a different person, rather then do it's best to "get to/attack" the target of the demoralize.
The feat require the target affected to attack. Teleporting is a standard action, so that would have been against the effect of the feat, an action that certainly negate the ability to attack.
The demon tried to reach the person that antagonized him, but he had no idea of who he was you (you acted from behind a wall and door). Found someone, someone had antagonized him. He attacked someone.
That is why using antagonize require LOS. If the target don't know who antagonized him he is entitled to attack anyone.
Lynceus |
Whew-